Once again, I am suggesting that an individual/politician can hypothetically be charged with conspiracy and a reasonable person would interpret that as "collusion." The underlying crime could be illegal campaign contributions for all I know.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by roadGator

Member since Feb 2009

154220 posts

Posted on 8/1/18 at 3:08 pm to cahoots

hypothetically
could be
maybe
may
perhaps

Ugh

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerDoc

Texas

Member since Apr 2004

11387 posts

Posted on 8/1/18 at 3:09 pm to BBONDS25

quote:
Have you come to the realization that I have been right all along yet Doc? I believe in you!!

I appreciate it, man. You've gotta feel proud that Trump has taken up the "collusion ain't a crime" argument that you baws started last summer. And Podesta referred to SDNY. It's a red-letter week, my friend.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by BBONDS25

Member since Mar 2008

55927 posts

Posted on 8/1/18 at 3:11 pm to TigerDoc

Proud, no. Knowing so much is a burden sometimes. You know that.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bjorn Cyborg

Member since Sep 2016

33781 posts

Posted on 8/1/18 at 3:17 pm to SDVTiger

Did anyone read that Washington Post story supposedly debunking Hillary colluding with Russia on the dossier.

Good lord, that writer likely broke his back with such a reach.

"That may seem like a lot of smoke to some people, buuuut ....."

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Vecchio Cane

Ivory Tower

Member since Jul 2016

18343 posts

Posted on 8/1/18 at 3:20 pm to Bjorn Cyborg

quote:
Did anyone read that Washington Post story supposedly debunking Hillary colluding with Russia on the dossier. Good lord, that writer likely broke his back with such a reach.

Yep. I kept asking myself "are they really trying to make that point?" And yes, they really tried to make that point