re: Why do liberals get so mad when someone exposes child sex trafficking?

quote:

---

Yeah, it’s odd that their first reaction to child sex trafficking being exposed is “well some people believe in conspiracy theories”.

---

the media and white chicks have convinced men without balls that everything that CNN doesnt praise is a conspiracy theory.

If fricking worked. All you have to do is say "conspiracy theory" and they assume its bunk.

quote:

---

Exposing sex trafficking is great but let's not pretend that people haven't stretched it into conspiracies

---

We didn't stretch it. The fact that Epstein's client list is still a secret even though there's a woman sitting in prison for trafficking tells you everything you need to know.

quote:

---

and claim it’s a “conspiracy theory”.

---

Like they said about election fraud, and CRT, and tranny dances for children, and coming for your guns.......

quote:

---

Do people who already know child sex trafficking exists typically spend extraordinary amounts of time trying to discredit exposes of child sex trafficking?

---

That entirely depends on the type of sex trafficking being discussed.

quote:

---

Globalists trafficking children and using them as sacrifices in Satanic rituals is all a "conspiracy theory" according to the resident board Satan experts.

---

Do you agree that what I quoted above does not exist and is only a conspiracy theory?

I think those claims should be discredited and are worth my time doing so. Do you?

quote:

---

Why did you insert that letter into this discussion Rog?

---

Its the dog whistle that brings you to the defense of all things "trafficked."

That author has you pegged. it worked.

quote:

---

Or perhaps, the people who harp on “conspiracy theories” do so in order to obfuscate the fact that they support child sex trafficking and pedophilia.

---

There is certainly some of that no doubt

quote:

---

You’re doing here exactly what we’re talking about.

---

No I already admitted it exists, and is bad. My purity test is over.

Then we were discussing things.

quote:

---

and your first response is to bring up conspiracy theories.

---

Not my first response.

I answered your question and gave you an example.

I said

I think you ignore their initial reaction, which is "No shite. I don't need to be told child sex trafficking exists like a simpleton."

To which you replied:

Do people who already know child sex trafficking exists typically spend extraordinary amounts of time trying to discredit exposes of child sex trafficking?

And I told you, directly, for some allegations, they do.

Then I gave you an example of those allegations.

quote:

---

What you’re doing is trying to obfuscate the fact that children are being sexually exploited.

---

Nope. Nobody is disagreeing with this or disputing it.

That's already been admitted by all.

I am saying that children are not being exploited in this specific manner:

quote:

---

Globalists trafficking children and using them as sacrifices in Satanic rituals is all a "conspiracy theory" according to the resident board Satan experts.

---

Do you agree with me or disagree?

quote:

---

Nobody other than every single media critic.

---

Every media critic was posting in this thread? How is it only on page 2?

quote:

---

If they thought Republicans were doing it, they would be mobilizing a worldwide campaign of terror against it.

Their moralizing against the idea of trafficking is based solely on the idea that it would give air to a right wing idea.

---

Except all the grandstanding around Dennis Hastert

Or when they linked Trump to Epstein during his entire Presidency

And anytime a Republican is busted for child porn or molestation.

OTHER THAN THOSE TIMES, it's a one-way street.