- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why didn't the Hard Rock building collapse like WTC building 7?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:47 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:47 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Once the planes hit the building there is enough heat to ignite the preplaced thermite.
So, your contention is that George Bush and his band of ninja's disguised themselves as insulation contractors to place "nano" thermite all over every world trade center building, and then fly a plane in it to ignite the nanothermite, and not a single human being saw them, nor has any whistleblower come out? How long, exactly, do you think it would take to coat the WTC twin towers with thermite? You would need an army of people working years to do this. And, where do they place it in the twin towers? Twin towers structural elements was the exoskeleton of the building. It had no internal columns.
1
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:48 pm to ShortyRob
I'm willing to consider a lot of theories such as people within our government knowing about or being in on the ACT as it happened
But the absurd s*** I have to believe in order to buy the hogwash in this thread is just hilarious.
These conspiracy theories are nothing more than the Rube Goldberg machine of how to get into war.
It's like these people never consider all of the extra ramifications of their theories being true.
I don't believe the explanations for the building's coming down because I trust the government. I believe them because the alternatives are just stupid and make no logical sense even if I assumed absolute corruption from the government
But the absurd s*** I have to believe in order to buy the hogwash in this thread is just hilarious.
These conspiracy theories are nothing more than the Rube Goldberg machine of how to get into war.
It's like these people never consider all of the extra ramifications of their theories being true.
I don't believe the explanations for the building's coming down because I trust the government. I believe them because the alternatives are just stupid and make no logical sense even if I assumed absolute corruption from the government
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:48 pm to SSpaniel
quote:Yeah, unfortunately, a BB18 fuse holder power feed lug has nothing to do with explosives
Why, to wire together the charges used to bring down the buildings, of course.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:49 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Why are you so triggered?
Because i'm arguing with a "person" who legitimately believes George Bush and his band of ninja's rigged multiple buildings to implode just so they could "war". You are a few cards short of a full deck. Good luck with that, chief.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:49 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
if for some reason you believe that the buildings had to come down to hide something you could have placed charges and then use the truck bomb to take the b**** down and still gotten away with it
But a truck bomb couldn't get close enough to the structural members. I don't like that theory.
And that was already tried to no avail in '93.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:50 pm to BugAC
quote:
nor has any whistleblower come out? How long, exactly, do you think it wou
That's one of the funny parts.
In a town full of people that hate conservatives not a single whistleblower who was privy to the plan
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:50 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But a truck bomb couldn't get close enough to the structural members. I don't like that theory
LOL
Now you're just trolling
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:51 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But a truck bomb couldn't get close enough to the structural members. I don't like that theory.
And that was already tried to no avail in '93.
By the way the fact that it was already tried is what would have made it even more believable if they did it again!
and so what if it really would have explained the buildings coming down
We have already established that we are operating under the assumption that they would lie about how it happened
My point is if they would lie about how it happened there were about a billion simpler ways to do it
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:52 pm to BugAC
quote:
Because i'm arguing with a "person" who legitimately believes George Bush and his band of ninja's rigged multiple buildings to implode just so they could "war".
You are jumping to conclusions.
The "war" part I was asked to speculate.
In the OP, I still have lingering questions about the nature of WTC 7 building collapse. It looks like a controlled demolition. Sorry, but that's what it looks like.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:53 pm to GumboPot
quote:
In the OP, I still have lingering questions about the nature of WTC 7 building collapse. It looks like a controlled demolition. Sorry, but that's what it looks like.
says the guy who isn't a structural engineer and knows nothing about controlled demolitions by his own admission
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:54 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I still have lingering questions about the nature of WTC 7 building collapse. It looks like a controlled demolition. Sorry, but that's what it looks like.
How many building collapses have you seen that aren't controlled demos?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:56 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
In a town full of people that hate conservatives not a single whistleblower who was privy to the plan
quote:
Mr. Howard confesses that once the building went down he and his co-workers celebrated with whiskey and cigars. However after reviewing the tapes the quickly became worried. After seeing how smoothly the Trade Center collapsed they feared the public would become suspicious. He says, "We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid. It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought shite, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did… At that point we really thought the gig was up.”
LINK
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:57 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
In a town full of people that hate conservatives not a single whistleblower who was privy to the plan
And to think.. Trump's had 3 or 4 come forward just over a single phone call with Ukraine. You KNOW at least one would have come forward in the last 18 years over taking down the World Trade Center and attacking the Pentagon, right? I mean... at least 1?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:58 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
How many building collapses have you seen that aren't controlled demos?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:59 pm to GumboPot
Well, according to that website, the Vatican can also time travel
Posted on 10/17/19 at 3:00 pm to GumboPot
That doesn't answer the question at all.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 3:05 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But a truck bomb couldn't get close enough to the structural members. I don't like that theory.
And that was already tried to no avail in '93.
What about addressing my questions.
In 2001 the tallest building to have a CD was 30 stories tall and took a team of 12 experts 24 days to rig..in full view and driving forklifts around.
So you think that someone could just smear some thermite and fuses around and drop the building??
Paint a picture showing how you believe this was done.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 3:05 pm to upgrayedd
quote:They also have footage of real life superhumans, but admittedly it's buried behind the breaking news of the time traveling Vatican
Well, according to that website, the Vatican can also time travel
Posted on 10/17/19 at 3:07 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It looks like a controlled demolition. Sorry, but that's what it looks like.
It doesn't look anything like a CD.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 3:08 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Mr. Howard confesses that once the building went down he and his co-workers celebrated with whiskey and cigars. However after reviewing the tapes the quickly became worried. After seeing how smoothly the Trade Center collapsed they feared the public would become suspicious. He says, "We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid. It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought shite, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did… At that point we really thought the gig was up.”
Page 11 of 12
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News