- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are "they" so obsessed with mentions of 'FLAT EARTH'? Just a silly "CT", right?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:23 am to Liberator
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:23 am to Liberator
quote:
Shoot.
Ok. Why is the burden of proof sooo small for “believers”.. but the burden of proof is sooo large for “non believers”
You dispute photos.. and claim a lens manipulation. But then you post a photo.. and say “see!!!”.
BTW I’m still waiting on the coherent answer as to why Polaris is not visible from New Zealand if the earth is a flat plane.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 11:25 am
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:23 am to Liberator
quote:Because their target audience is unfamiliar with the term "Luddite."
Why are "they" so obsessed with mentions of 'FLAT EARTH'?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:26 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
We've now said this word enough times for me to do this:
Apollo 8 astronauts reading from Genesis, Christmas Eve, 1968
But...Does it "prove" anything?
Did you know those guys also conducted a live phone with President Nixon IN REAL TIME? (what happened to the usual "time-delay"?)
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:29 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Hahaha, no shite, you don’t even understand density.
Explain it to me really slowly then, Einstein.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:31 am to Liberator
quote:The time delay averages about 2.5 seconds in each direction. If you watch the videos of the call, there is always a delay of about 5 seconds between Nixon and the crew. No delay between Nixon and Houston. Imagine that.
Did you know those guys (Apollo crew) also conducted a live phone with President Nixon IN REAL TIME? (what happened to the usual "time-delay"?)
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:31 am to SOSFAN
quote:
Exactly how high does one must get to believe in this?
Start getting high now.
Mark the time.
Report back.
DoItFoRsCiEnCe
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:32 am to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
Start getting high now.
Mark the time.
Report back.
DoItFoRsCiEnCe
I've been very proactive today so way ahead of the game lol
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:34 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Why is the burden of proof sooo small for “believers”.. but the burden of proof is sooo large for “non believers”
Context?
quote:
You dispute photos.. and claim a lens manipulation. But then you post a photo.. and say “see!!!”.
Which specific photo?
Btw, IF you notice, ALL NASA's supposed "photos" aren't; they are "IMAGES" -- "composite" at that. If you need proof o my claim, check it out yourself.
quote:
BTW I’m still waiting on the coherent answer as to why Polaris is not visible from New Zealand if the earth is a flat plane.
Simply because Polaris is beyond the sight line / horizon of those in NZ (same of N. Hemisphere who cannot see the Southern Cross.
A visual:
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:37 am to guedeaux
quote:
Perspective.
Sky diving from space
Are you familiar with the FISH EYE LENS?
(beyond obvious in that link to the bogus Red Bull Jump.)
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:37 am to Liberator
Is the moon flat too? Are the other planets flat discs? Was the lunar landing staged? Just trying to get all the crazy shite in the right baskets.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:38 am to CleverUserName
quote:
why Polaris is not visible from New Zealand if the earth is a flat plane.
For the same reason that the horizon is only about 3 miles away. Your eyesight isn't unlimited. There comes a point at distance when you can cease to see based on your vantage point. The theory is that Polaris is closer to the vantage point in the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern. And There is still the atmosphere through which light dissipates as well.
Now a question for you.
Is the earth a sphere or pear-shaped?
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:38 am to Liberator
I can see the moon and sun in the same daytime sky somewhat frequently. Fairly close together
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:40 am to LakeCharles
quote:
("FWIW, I have thousand of hours of research in this subject.")
It would have been so much more beneficial to have stayed awake in high school science class.
Because the Matrix's HS "Science" (and "History") teach all you need to know about both?
MEMO: Everyone is going to have to learn about reality & truth independent from The Narrative. If we don't know this by now all is lost.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:40 am to Houstiger
The idea is that the moon is not Terra firma, but merely a night light. It isn't reflected light, but emits its on light that just so happens to be vastly different than sunlight as it were.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:42 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
I can see the moon and sun in the same daytime sky somewhat frequently. Fairly close together
And that alone blows some people's minds.
(And so does the reality that the Moon's "Light" is NOT "reflected" from the Sun, but it is it's own source. As you likely know / suspect, "Plasma" is that theory.)
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:43 am to Gideon Swashbuckler
quote:
The idea is that the moon is not Terra firma, but merely a night light. It isn't reflected light, but emits its on light that just so happens to be vastly different than sunlight as it were.
You're all over the truth on this.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:45 am to Liberator
Okay, I gotta watch this video now...
Made it 12 seconds in.. all that is too stupid to even give time to.
Made it 12 seconds in.. all that is too stupid to even give time to.
This post was edited on 5/26/22 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:45 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Like the Q-Tard crap. The method is obvious.
Don't lump Q in with this ridiculous shite. Q is about exposing government corruption. Q has Hillary Clinton's lawyer sitting in a court room right now.
This thread is fricking ridiculous. I'm convinced this flat Earth bullshite was pumped by nefarious actors with the purpose of making all "conspiracy theorists" look like fools.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:47 am to Houstiger
quote:
Is the moon flat too? Are the other planets flat discs?
The evidence suggests...YES and YES. (we NEVER "see" the "other side" of the moon. Ask yourself: Why are there NO NASA "photos"?)
quote:
Was the lunar landing staged?
Just like any other Stanley Kubrick film
quote:
Just trying to get all the crazy shite in the right baskets.
It is crazy; Crazy that The Deception has worked for this long when the Truth is easily exposed when researched.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:48 am to Liberator
quote:
Simply because Polaris is beyond the sight line / horizon of those in NZ (same of N. Hemisphere who cannot see the Southern Cross.
How does a star drop below the sight line across a flat plane???? You can use a telescope. Polaris is right above the North Pole.. which would be center of your flat earth.
Soo if it’s center of the flat earth. Why can you not observe it from one side of the flat earth.. and not the other? It’s a flat plane. The line of sight is the same.
quote:
Context?
I told you. One example is you downplaying a photo… but using a photo to try to prove a point.
Also. Can you explain the science behind a concave atmosphere over a flat earth?
Popular
Back to top


2




