- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are the poli board's leftards so upset over drug runners being blown up?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:42 pm to Decatur
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:42 pm to Decatur
It's even worse because it's a fake war to begin with. It's just state murder of another country's civilians. I don't know what you call that.
2
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:43 pm to SaintsReportExile
WGAF about such people known as leftards? They have been ridiculed all of their lives and are soulless.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:45 pm to Decatur
quote:
It’s the obvious option, yes?
far from it. Yikes. Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:46 pm to Decatur
quote:
The scenario is literally a textbook case of a war crime.
an allegation with no source? Good luck. Remember when you fell for the Steele dossier? You’ll never learn. Oh…and define war crime. Give the statute. So we can all be on the same page. You said it was textbook…provide it.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:46 pm to Bunk Moreland
In waters not in any proximity to ours. They don't meet the definition of pirates.....and for"terrorists" they haven't been all that.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:47 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
It's even worse because it's a fake war to begin with. It's just state murder of another country's civilians. I don't know what you call that.
Without any Congressional authority, no *actual* armed conflict, no actual self-defense, etc., it' just sparkling felony murder.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:48 pm to Decatur
quote:
Without any Congressional authority, no *actual* armed conflict, no actual self-defense, etc., it' just sparkling felony murder.
oh my. You are going to be very disappointed. By the way. Did Obama commit felony murder when he droned US citizens? This should be good.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:49 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
It was like Tom Homan: did you take the 50k? "The DOJ concluded that I did nothing illegal." That's not a denial of the facts.
I wonder what happened to that 50k in taxpayer cash?
The ease with which a story like that disappeared makes me think this one will go nowhere too.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:49 pm to SaintsReportExile
Dead people’s votes count in elections, you have to fight for their rights too!!! DUH!
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:49 pm to SaintsReportExile
Because the Orange Man is bad.
If Kamala was doing this, it would be the greatest thing ever. Same as if she was pursuing Trump's immigration/deportation efforts.
This is pure anti-Trump agitprop.
If Kamala was doing this, it would be the greatest thing ever. Same as if she was pursuing Trump's immigration/deportation efforts.
This is pure anti-Trump agitprop.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
an allegation with no source? Good luck.
Your luck, I happen to be in a giving mood today.
quote:
18.3.2.1 Clearly Illegal Orders to Commit Law of War Violations. The
requirement to refuse to comply with orders to commit law of war violations applies to orders to perform conduct that is clearly illegal or orders that the subordinate knows, in fact, are illegal. For example, orders to fire upon the shipwrecked would be clearly illegal.27
Department of Defense Law of War Manual
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:53 pm to SaintsReportExile
Drug money fuels pedophilia. Pedophilia to a democrat is what abortion used to be. Protect it at all costs.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:56 pm to Decatur
Yeah, well......but nobody actually reads the manual. Reading is for nerds.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:01 pm to Decatur
You link a manual that specifically says these are guidelines and the opinion for the DOD as law? The manual that on page one says the DOD can revise its stance at any time?
I asked you to cite the law that was being broken. You saying that it was just internal manual procedures from 2006 that allegedly violated?
I asked you to cite the law that was being broken. You saying that it was just internal manual procedures from 2006 that allegedly violated?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Made by whom?
"Persons familiar with the situation." Which is certainly not good enough...particularly against Trump.
But...now, I have read Hegseth's response. It too is like Leavitt's: there's no dispute of the factual allegations. He just says "we're following the law."
If he had said "Of course, I gave no such 'no quarter' order...everyone in the military knows that's illegal" I would think it didn't happen. Instead, he just said, we follow the law. My guess is that they have some legal opinion drafted that says "It's OK to kill survivors because...you know...."
Anyhow, I hope it didn't happen, but there's certainly enough smoke to investigate. There isn't an officer in our military who would say it's lawful to kill survivors. Maybe we will find out if it happened.
" A top Republican senator, Roger Wicker, has joined his Democratic counterpart in calling for "vigorous oversight to determine the facts" of allegations that the military intentionally killed survivors of a boat strike.
"The Committee has directed inquiries to the Department, and we will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances," said Sen. Wicker, R-Miss., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee."
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:02 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Yeah, well......but nobody actually reads the manual.
Neither did Decatur. Neither did you. Page one destroys his entire “argument.” He is also assuming the source less allegation is a fact. Par for the course. When will you gullible dummies stop falling for fake news?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:04 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Persons familiar with the situation.
There it is. Yet you fall for it again!
quote:
there's no dispute of the factual allegations.
Who said this? Certainly not Leavitt. Or is this you regurgitating a reporter misreporting what was said and taking allegations from nameless sources as fact? Even someone as dumb as you has to recognize this pattern by now. Right? Right?
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:04 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I doubted the story because I thought it was too sensational to be true. But the refusal to deny is a bit strange.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
but there's certainly enough smoke to investigate
Remember this standard. All it takes is an allegation and that’s enough smoke. You won’t enjoy that standard.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:14 pm to Big Scrub TX
What's so hard to understand about this. Why Venezuela first? Why not Mexico or Colombia if the drug angle is true?
Maybe there is both happening but we do not know about it. Hmmmmm…things that make you think.
Maybe there is both happening but we do not know about it. Hmmmmm…things that make you think.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News