Started By
Message

re: Who Will Protect Us From The Government's Standing Army?

Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:39 am to
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14430 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:39 am to
Ulvade has a police force.....
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17444 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:40 am to
That’s not what I said you clown lol. My argument is that this isn’t some military wing, or law enforcement group, that’s gonna come after everyone with guns drawn, and tactically try and take us down.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
10974 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:43 am to
quote:

That’s not what I said you clown lol.

I quoted you verbatim. It’s exactly what you said.

You are somehow dumber than I originally thought.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
10043 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Do you even understand how dumb you sound?


He's from St Amant, cut him some slack.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17444 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:55 am to
No you’re just simple minded
Posted by TideHater
Orange Beach AL
Member since May 2007
19808 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 11:58 am to
Scared????

Like Rudy from Notre Dame said...I have been waiting for this my whole life.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126656 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Our actual military couldn't defeat some sandal wearing cave men in 10 years with unlimited resources...
I would be careful in that assessment. In my opinion, there was little to no incentive to successfully conclude the conflict. A lot of the senior DoD leadership was quite content with the state of affairs.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18961 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:08 pm to
Answer: The People. With far more guns and bullets than the government has. Also, most full-power rifle cartridges defeat riot helmets, shields, soft body armor. Hard armor can stop it to a degree but the kinetic impact can put someone out of the fight.
Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
4592 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:10 pm to
It’s called “RULES OF ENGAGEMENT”

The hijacked USA military plays by social Justice rules, while the countries we fight have zero rules.

We don’t fight these wars to wipe anyone off the face of the earth.

We use it to “launder money” and finance new regimes that have later grown up to hate us.

You’d better believe that if it ever turns out where the Fed Gov turns against what they call the “Christian Nationalist” movement, the rules of engagement will play by the Marxist/Communist rules that were used in the Bolshevik Revolution.

That’s what is scary about weaponizing every single enforcement entity in the Fed Gov.

So all of you guys/gals beating your chest and not afraid due to comparison on how they handle other countries or enemies, you’d better realize this is a game that they will not fight fairly, and if you enjoy freedom, you may want to pay attention to what’s going on & not take it so lightly.
Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
4592 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:14 pm to
The only reason people think they “need weapons” to do their job, is because they are overreaching their authority and they know their will be a boiling point down the road.

Why can’t you people realize this?
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53953 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:23 pm to
Yeah because Texas citizens have purchased 1.6 million firearms in 2021 alone…
This post was edited on 8/22/22 at 12:28 pm
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
8627 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

They’re not some military branch, or law enforcement branch.


Right, because they can't take your land and house like the IRS can. Plus you cars, motorcycles and guns.
This post was edited on 8/22/22 at 12:30 pm
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16729 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Yeah because Texas citizens have purchased 1.6 million firearms in 2021 alone…



All active military, reserves and law enforcement in the US totals less than 5 million people.

vs

more than 100 million armed citizens.

Yes the military and LE would have better weapons but against that many people it would be almost impossible for them to outright win a conflict.

It would turn into a long lasting, bloody, nasty event where millions die. Many of those 100 million civilians are the people that the the country depends on to run refineries, railroads, power plants, and truckers. The loss of them would drastically degrade the ability of the government to use those superior weapons. The government only has so much stuff in a particular location. When fuel runs out and there is no resupply or when food runs scarce and truckers dont deliver more the government would cease to function.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17444 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:40 pm to
So they’re doing the same shite they’ve always been doing then? Why the sudden mass panic over the IRS, when they’re doing the same things they’ve always done?
Posted by Swamp Angel
West Georgia Chicken Farm Territory
Member since Jul 2004
9736 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

As far as the military, I believe many of the active army would not bear arms against their average countrymen in a civil war.


I don't mean to sound like Debby Downer, but I have a feeling you'd be mighty disappointed if it came down to it. It's a lot easier (and more appealing for your personal safety) to just follow the orders of your superiors and not rock the boat. I don't see that many jumping ship to defend their countrymen against the federal government these days.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19233 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

They’re not some military branch, or law enforcement branch.

IRS has the Criminal Investigations Division with arrest powers. Yes, they are a law enforcement agency.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

You’d better believe that if it ever turns out where the Fed Gov turns against what they call the “Christian Nationalist” movement, the rules of engagement will play by the Marxist/Communist rules that were used in the Bolshevik Revolution.


Bears repeating.

Overall, a sobering and sharp post.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I have a feeling you'd be mighty disappointed if it came down to it. It's a lot easier (and more appealing for your personal safety) to just follow the orders of your superiors and not rock the boat.

I don't see that many jumping ship to defend their countrymen against the federal government these days.


I concur.

Who sees local or regional LE / muscle risking losing their $100k-$150+k salaries & bennies (and mortgage, toys, life-style etc)?

Sadly for the vast majority, the motivation to "Just following orders" and "Just doing my job" will easily supersede Principles, Oath and God's Law at decision-time.

Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
4592 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:57 pm to
Sorry, my fat thumbs accidentally down-voted you vs. and the correct upvote, I downvoted a compliment to my own post. lol ??

But you 1000% get the end game scenario, it’s unfolding right before our eyes.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Many of those 100 million civilians are the people that the the country depends on to run refineries, railroads, power plants, and truckers.


Might one main reason for the unfettered, enabled invasion of over 50 million foreign "migrants" be considered Exhibit "A" of a "Who-will-run-the-ship?" solution?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram