Started By
Message

re: Who was the most dangerous Dem VP selection for Trump?

Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:24 pm to
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54207 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Who was the most dangerous Dem VP selection for Trump?


Any of the women of African American lineage. The ones who are actually black. Why? Because the media could basically twist anything Trump says and twist it into a racial pretzel. With Harris, not so much. MOF, what racist comments I've seen so far are coming from the left. -4D chess by Biden for picking her.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79025 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

Julian Castro


Didn’t that little troll use a step stool at the debates? Serious question
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27531 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:43 pm to
Tulsi or Reek.
Posted by Northwestern tiger
Long Island NY
Member since Oct 2005
23483 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:46 pm to
None
VP doesn’t matter
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10456 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:47 pm to
Their campaign may be stupid enough to think Harris will get them not the black vote and Indian vote.

I mean many of my Indian friends voted for Jindal just because they wanted one of their own in power despite warnings and then realized their stupidity. Hope they don’t pull that crap again.

Otherwise, I’d say M Obama likely is the one that was most dangerous.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108146 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:47 pm to
Tulsi for sure. She was a pit bull in a debate, an undeniable patriot, a rare non-liar in Washington, and hot as shite. She’d be hard for the Right to take down. Kamala is like shooting fish in a barrel, as Tulsi herself proved.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108146 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

Otherwise, I’d say M Obama likely is the one that was most dangerous.


She has no interest being President though, and I don’t blame her in the slightest for that.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
7168 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:21 pm to
Buttigieg would’ve been problematic. He doesn’t come across as an extremist, is young and personable and could bridge a gap to independents that Harris won’t. He’s also gay so they get to play up the historic nature of his selection too.

With that being said, Biden is the top of the ticket and I believe independents and the still semi-sane dems are going to have a problem voting for Biden due to his mental faculties faltering.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:22 pm to
Someone not a politician.

McRaven or Mattis could have helped turn Industrial Midwest and even Southern states.

Sotomoyar would be have been effective and dangerous on the debate stage and would have been an all in move by the Democrats and appealed to Women and Hispanics.

If a black women had to be the choice - Oprah- I can't think of anyone else with much popularity.



Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80206 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:23 pm to
Blacks hate homos. No amount of Obama soothsaying was going to make up for Mayor Pete with a dick in his a-hole. That dog don’t hunt
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131359 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:24 pm to
Val Demings with her law enforcement back ground was probably the bigger threat to Trump.

But the same law enforcement back ground was a liability within her own party.
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 10:27 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140087 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:25 pm to
Who did you hope would run for VP of your party if not Kamala?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80206 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Mattis


That’s a curveball. Trump couldn’t out- tough him and depending on his performance, could may have even flipped some voters.

Still wouldn’t have turned out the purple haired trannies, but it’s a good wild card selection
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80206 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:26 pm to
Ms garrison
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79634 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

Val Demings with her law enforcement back ground was probably the bigger thread to Trump.

But the same law enforcement back ground was a liability within her own party.


She would’ve at least come across as more genuine.

Kamala is an ambitious fraud. And everybody knows it.
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Blacks hate homos. No amount of Obama soothsaying was going to make up for Mayor Pete with a dick in his a-hole. That dog don’t hunt

Obama was as gay as Mayor Pete, just not courageous enough to come out.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140087 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:27 pm to
Just because you two are doing it doesn’t mean she’d make a great VP. Cmon mayne.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79634 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:28 pm to
Mattis

quote:

That’s a curveball. Trump couldn’t out- tough him and depending on his performance, could may have even flipped some voters.


Would’ve had the perfect campaign slogan: Mad Dog 2020.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131359 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:28 pm to
yea, of the list of most likely candidates, Demings didn't seem to have the baggage of the other prospects.

Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
24973 posts
Posted on 8/11/20 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Tulsi would have terrified me.


This. She doesn't have the name recognition Harris does, but that would be a good thing in this instance bc Harris just isn't liked.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram