Started By
Message

re: Who the cuck is "Louisiana First Republicans PAC" and why are they against St George?

Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:43 pm to
Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:43 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 8:59 pm
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28892 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

Me. The dirty tricks pulled by the better togethers are reason alone to support it.


I am only following Saint George from afar but everything I have read from the better together group is “they’re racist” and “we can’t pay for everything else we want to do with SG’s money.”

I’m sure that there is some very real racism to how everything went down 50+ years ago but it’s very obvious that the objectors just want money from a certain portion of the town and don’t care about the people there.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79677 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

it’s very obvious that the objectors just want money from a certain portion of the town and don’t care about the people there.


That’s exactly what it is.

The leadership in Baton Rouge wants the unincorporated areas to just keep on forking over and shut up about where that money goes. Well, the people in those areas have had enough of that mess.

Now the leadership in BR is faced with losing all that StG money. They’re faced with making some radical changes in how things are done, or BR dies on the vine. In short, the gravy train is over. Therefore, to keep BR alive without having to make the hard choices, it’s easier to just pull out all the stops to either keep the measure off the ballot (they did that 4 years ago, but failed in that endeavor this time around) or make sure it’s defeated at the polls. But the support for it is just too strong this time. It’s gonna pass.
This post was edited on 9/15/19 at 9:38 pm
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 9:59 pm to
You have an area that services have been underfunded while the area keeps growing.

The metro council is funding wants instead of needs. When you hear the council debate and find money to supplement a private industry aka grocery stores while there no enthusiasm other issues something wrong.
This parish has flooding problems with no plan or enthusiasm. Where is the enthusiasm to fix roads in neighborhoods, smaller parish roads, and maintain sides of these roads?

A lot of people in this area flooded while assistance to help people get permits or direction on how to rebuild was poor throughout this parish.
Other towns that flooded supported their community a lot better where unincorporated were left in the dark.
EBRP metro council along with the mayor president did the bare minimum which is unacceptable.

Sheriff dept has only 7 officers on duty in this area which most deputy’s are pulling duty in Gardere. It is a shame that a lot of smaller towns have more officers on duty per shift than this area does.

Garbage has been spotty while nothing has been done. There is a contract which if followed would solve a lot of the missed service issues. The metro council has refused to follow the contract instead choosing to have pixy and fairy dust meetings which nothing changes.

80,000 or more people deserve better than what they are paying for. They had four years to show this area they would make improvements while nothing has been done.

My vote will reflect it is time for a change.
In my opinion the City of BR and Parish governments need to spilt to serve the people of this parish and The City of BR residents better.
This post was edited on 9/15/19 at 10:08 pm
Posted by LSULaw2009
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
1695 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 10:09 pm to
Doesn't appear to be registered on Ethic's PAC list. LINK

There is a "Louisiana First PAC" based out of Shreveport, but none listed with "Louisiana First Republicans PAC."
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27356 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Wrong. I do care about paying more taxes..


I (not sure where you live) am going to get taxed from either side. The point is I would rather pick a side that I have SOME trust versus zero trust to spend my hard earned money in this proposed area.

I do agree with the other things you are saying but TEA Party activities but the incorporation does NOT have to be mutually exclusive. In fact, they are kind of unrelated in this instance.

Constituents in this area are being bled dry to fund shite mostly in other parts of town.

NOLA article on why ONE BR wants to keep SG from incorporating
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 10:13 pm to
Nothing will happen to the person or persons doing this. No one will investigate this. If you are on the side the power to be want you on then laws mean nothing.

Why worry about it?
Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 11:10 pm to

This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 8:58 pm
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9958 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 1:39 am to
Bogus. EBRP Republican Party announced they haven’t shite to do with these hacks

And Johnny I meant to upvote not down
This post was edited on 9/16/19 at 1:43 am
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28892 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 7:10 am to
quote:

. That said, I think it will pass because I think citizens have been misinformed


You sound like a Hillary supporter or Brexit opposer the day after the election.
Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:41 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 8:53 pm
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9958 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 12:00 pm to
State board of ethics has no registry of these people. Wow
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37091 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 3:09 pm to
It stands to reason that creating another level of government will come at additional cost.

However, two things.

1) It's been widely reported that St. George pays more in taxes to EBR than services received. And that some of that tax money would stay in St George due to the goofy tax structures in place. It may be that the money that stays home is enough to cover the added expense.

2) Being a conservative republican doesn't mean being against all taxes. It means wanting a fair value of return on your taxes. If St. George is run properly, it might be worth a few extra bucks.

Pretty ironic that this flyer is bashing a deal with Jindal, the ultimate "no tax Republican"
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 5:08 pm to
Probably the same "conservatives" for JBE cocksmokers.
Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:09 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 8:52 pm
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6772 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:32 am to
quote:

However, the PPP model of government does nothing to quell those concerns and that is what the city will be modeled after. PPPs offer no financial benefit to taxpayers( they are expensive!!!) and connected businesses, by partnering with Govt. will profit and gain more power over elected officials.


Independent firm confirms they will run a $24.5M surplus in their first year.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram