Started By
Message

re: White liberal women are ruining America

Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21684 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:57 pm to
I don’t necessarily disagree with much you have to say, wacka… but, again, I will point out that in almost all arenas that crazy women have taken over, and you’ve listed quite a few, are areas that men have abdicated their leadership and responsibility. That goes all the way back to the garden of Eden.

What is feminism? Its origins? Subversive and perverse men.

I’m ready for strong, moral, decisive men to take the reins… I truly am. I don’t know how that happens though.

If we’re going to pick on white liberal women… why not black ones too? Or squishy men like Walz or Bootygig?

quote:

It's what liberal white women culturally normalize.


Can’t argue with that. Toxic empathy Olympics is real. I WILL say that putting the onus of Drag Queens on women is interesting though, lol. Although I kinda get why you would- but still, that’s a man issue and yall need to start kicking some sissy arse.

Your bottom line I agree with- as a bloc, AWFULS definitely punch above their weight class. Men need to start leading again.. believe it or not, many women crave that dynamic.

Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196538 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

almost all arenas that crazy women have taken over, and you’ve listed quite a few, are areas that men have abdicated their leadership and responsibility
Amen
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13429 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

are areas that men have abdicated their leadership and responsibility. That goes all the way back to the garden of Eden.


Yeah, again, I have posted the same thing many times.

quote:

If we’re going to pick on white liberal women… why not black ones too?


I thought I answered that. The size of the demographic. (BTW, the OP never said that ONLY white liberal women were ruining America. But black women usually don't go in for the sexual perversions embraced by white liberal women, for one thing.)

This seems to be all about blame to you. I don't think that was the OPs point. There is a large demographic of women who have ingested and inculcated full blown feminism with all of the marxist underpinnings that come with it and their actions are deleterious to the welfare of society. Regardless of how we got here.

quote:

I WILL say that putting the onus of Drag Queens on women is interesting though, lol. Although I kinda get why you would- but still, that’s a man issue


Not at all. You think it's mainly dads who are taking 3 year olds to the library at 10:00 on a Tuesday to see that nonsense?

I don't. I think those things only happen because AWFULs support it.

quote:

I’m ready for strong, moral, decisive men to take the reins… I truly am. I don’t know how that happens though.


I would ask one thing about that...men taking the reins of what, exactly?

Because that's the thing...IMO both men and women need to be strong, moral, and decisive.

Being anti-feminist doesn't mean I think women are incompetent. What I think is that the family unit is supposed to be the basic unit of society that makes society possible, and men and women are inherently designed to be complimentary in their support of the family unit. Meaning that we tend toward being suited for equal but different roles in the family.

I think women should be educated. I think women can work outside the home if they want to with certain caveats*. I think that men are generally much better suited for working outside the home—both physically and emotionally—and I think women are inherently better suited to working inside the home.

And somebody has to do each of those things. Someone has to leave home and make money and someone has to take care of the kids and the house.

The modern solution is for both parents to leave home, for both to half-arse take care of the home, and not always equitably, and to pay strangers to raise the children.

It should be obvious to anyone that this is not ideal. What happened is that feminism convinced women that there is no value in the roles that they are suited for. The only value is in attempting to play the role of men. Again, I don't know why it isn't obvious to anyone that that is a silly lie. A woman who runs an efficient household and raises healthy and moral children does at least as much for society as a man who, say, trades stocks on Wall Street—and I would argue that her contribution is greater.

Which is why women should be as strong, moral, and decisive at their role as men should be in theirs.

Voting? Here's the thing about that...most women did not want the right to vote. The Anti-Suffragettes argued that giving women the vote robbed them of the moral high ground they previously occupied, as they would become just another voting bloc to be manipulated and bought by politicians. Women exerted significant influence as the moral conscience of the household before suffrage. They pretty much single-handedly pushed through the temperance movement and prohibition, for example. And the argument is that they would lose that influence and just start to cancel out their husband's votes, and they also predicted that giving women the vote would cause division on the family.

I can't really argue with what the Anti-Suffragettes predicted.

I think the government has got to stop rewarding behavior that leads to the destruction of the nuclear family (welfare benefits for brood mares, no fault divorces, etc.) and start rewarding behavior that leads to stable nuclear families. So I would structure the vote around married households, not individuals. Not saying no single people would get to vote, but I would prioritize the married households in some way.

*I think there are two times in a woman's lifecycle in which working outside the home makes sense. Before children, and after children become largely independent.
This post was edited on 3/7/26 at 12:01 am
Posted by superwolf
Member since Dec 2006
1164 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 11:54 pm to
Exactly!! I lived in Atlanta & you talk about hitting the nail on the head.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21684 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:06 am to
quote:

I thought I answered that. The size of the demographic.


You did.

quote:

Not at all. You think it's mainly dads who are taking 3 year olds to the library at 10:00 on a Tuesday to see that nonsense?


No... but men ARE the queens and the dads are allowing this to happen.

quote:

I would ask one thing about that...men taking the reins of what, exactly?


Leadership. In government, society, church, home. Leadership.

quote:

What I think is that the family unit is supposed to be the basic unit of society that makes society possible, and men and women are inherently designed to be complimentary in their support of the family unit. Meaning that we tend toward being suited for equal but different roles in the family.


Family really should be the building block. I think it's become a revenue source for government and cohesiveness and development be damned. We're all cogs. It is unnatural.
quote:

And somebody has to do each of those things. Someone has to leave home and make money and someone has to take care of the kids and the house. The modern solution is for both parents to leave home, for both to half-arse take care of the home, and not always equitably, and to pay strangers to raise the children.


This has always bothered me. On many different levels. I'm on wine #3 so I won't go into it all, but yes, someone needs to mind the home and the children within. Farming that out to day laborers devalues the family unit and shortchanges society.

quote:

Which is why women should be as strong, moral, and decisive at their role as men should be in theirs.


Yes, but... a family needs a "head". I am strong, decisive and wonderful- but I work with my husband, not against him.

quote:

What happened is that feminism convinced women that there is no value in the roles that they are suited for. The only value is in attempting to play the role of men. Again, I don't know why it isn't obvious to anyone that that is a silly lie. A woman who runs an efficient household and raises healthy and moral children does at least as much for society as a man who, say, trades stocks on Wall Street—and I would argue that her contribution is greater.


From your fingertips to society's ears.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20077 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 12:15 am to
quote:

Blame anyone other than the men who have been leading our country literally since its inception.


Are you going to sit here and actually say nothing that women have been pushing are causing problems? Are you really this blind or is this simply you being mad and wanting to hit back?

I’m genuinely curious. I’m hoping this is a faze.

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13429 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 7:39 am to
quote:

Yes, but... a family needs a "head".


Yes, someone needs to be in charge, agreed.

And the Biblical prescription is that should be the husband.

And that working depends on everyone playing their role. If the husband comes home one day and says, "I've taken a new job that I have determined will be better for the family; it's in Houston, 1500 miles away. Start packing, we leave in a week," then the wife should start packing and getting ready to leave. No argument, no questioning. Absolutely. Agree 100%.

But in order to earn that kind of authority, the husband should demonstrate that he is literally willing to lay down his life for the wife and the family. Work three jobs if he has to, even if he knows it will damage his health. Fight a grizzy bear in the woods knowing he's going to die, but hoping to buy an extra 45 seconds to give his wife and children time to escape. Sacrifice whatever he has to personally in order to provide for and protect the family.

And for that, he should get the kind of obedience from his wife that I described above (and the biggest piece of chicken at dinner time.)

The one bit of this that usually goes without discussion is that the husband is not at the top of this hierarchy.

The church is above him, and Christ above the church.

If the wife is not fulfilling her role in the family, she is answerable to the husband. If the husband is not fulfilling his role in the family, he's supposed to be answerable to the church. So that in a godly, Biblical household, the wife has recourse too. If the husband is being lazy or self-indulgent/selfish or foolish or whatever, she is supposed to be able to go to her pastor or priest and they are supposed to be able to call the husband in for a discussion.

That's how it is supposed to work and if it did, society would be absolutely transformed.



Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13550 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Blame anyone other than the men who have been leading our country literally since its inception.


Right on cue, one of those unhinged AWFLs sprints to this thread to demonstrate how unhinged and moronic she is.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33593 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:13 pm to
Posted by FoTownBam
Foley Al
Member since Oct 2023
4588 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Blame anyone other than the men who have been leading our country literally since its inception.

You liberal white womens keep voting for Democrat Beta male cucks that keep rewarding laziness and punishing hard working people and families. The same people keep sending money to places like Ukraine so they can protect their borders and meanwhile ours are wide open. You white liberal womens keep voting for supposed feminists, meanwhile they support dudes wearing dresses playing in women’s sports and sharing bathrooms with little girls. Liberal white womens vote for racist race baiters that claim to be for the black and Latino Americans, meanwhile they allow illegals in the country taking good paying jobs and causing rent shortages, therefore making housing nearly unaffordable for many blue collar type families. Liberal white womens vote for clowns that act like they care about low income minority families, but they reward women with kids if they divorce their husbands with free healthcare, assisted living, free groceries and many other prizes. These prizes increase with each sex trophy. You lib womens claim to care about the environment so you shove these stupid electric cars down our throats, meanwhile there’s a 7 year old Tanzanian boy digging in a mine barefoot, tired, and filthy so you can have your precious lithium battery for your fancy electric car and your upgraded phone. Your politicians do everything they can to destroy our nations oil industry. This does nothing but strengthen your favorite countries like Iran, Russia, and Venezuela. You liberal womens keep voting straight blue, then you wonder what happened to your favorite leftist utopian city when you wake up one morning and realize your city has turned into a shithole. Then you move to the south and bring your stupid vote here, complain about lack of street lights and lack of charging stations for your piece of crap electric car. So no, it’s not the same men leading our country as it was during inception. Those men were tough God fearing men with common sense. The men/women/trans that are running for blue haired vagina hat wearing feminazi womens are the people that are crapping all over our constitution, our traditions, and liberties.
Posted by LSUbacchus81
Hendersonville, TN
Member since Aug 2007
5888 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Blame anyone other than the men who have been leading our country literally since its inception.


White liberal women are a malignancy to society. You are an excellent example of this.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram