Started By
Message

re: White House proposes eliminating Head Start funding as part of sweeping budget cuts

Posted on 4/23/25 at 9:10 pm to
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
24868 posts
Posted on 4/23/25 at 9:10 pm to
More hysterics I see.
Posted by JacieNY
Member since Jul 2024
1917 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 11:04 am to
It is as the title says, gives kids a head start in school during a time of life when they absorb so much.

Which do you think leads to better education, a child sitting at home watching television all day or spending a few hours with other children and getting introduced to the basics of learning, such as the alphabet, numbers or even how to write their own name.

Children from low income families in particular benefit from this program and it is sad to see a government that devalues it's children when the return on the investment is so great.

One of my daughters is an elementary school teacher. Her first two jobs before that were working as a teacher with Head Start.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135804 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Children from low income families in particular benefit from this program and it is sad to see a government that devalues it's children when the return on the investment is so great.
Intuition would support your conclusion, but where is the evidence?
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20704 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 11:42 am to
Them poor peoples cannot afford Moms' day out at the Beau Chene Country Club. Tell the bums to go a job at minimum wage so they can spend more money than they earn to send the childrens to daycare.
Yeah - early childhood education attempts are really bad stuff for our country. Maybe should be like the Chinese and put every one of our Kids in front of computers 50 hours a week from the day they are born.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37832 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Intuition would support your conclusion, but where is the evidence?


The evidence shows that by 3rd grade head start kids are already behind again.

The evidence shows head start kids have more learning disabilities, worse grades, higher dropout rates, more discipline issues, and more likely to be unemployed if/when they graduate.

Because the key to growing up to be a successful and productive part of the community comes from having a stable home life with 2 parents, not from government incentivized programs that incentivize single motherhood
This post was edited on 4/24/25 at 11:53 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135804 posts
Posted on 4/24/25 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

The evidence shows that by 3rd grade head start kids are already behind again.
Right.
That's what I've seen as well.

But why?

ETA:
quote:

Because the key to growing up to be a successful and productive part of the community comes from having a stable home life with 2 parents
I get that.
But given two single parent groups, why would there not be a differential?
This post was edited on 4/24/25 at 4:05 pm
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 17Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram