- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where the link to the illegal eating pets
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:35 am to TakingStock
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:35 am to TakingStock
The media found one person to say what they wanted to hear and the “journalism” stopped right there.
Vance is right.
Vance is right.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:36 am to The Egg
quote:
i mean if we're being honest, the whole pet eating angle is so ridiculously stupid to even bring up as a political talking point.
you have literally everything else at your disposal to attack the dems on ie crime, immigration, border control, inflation, national debt, rising costs of everything, covid lockdowns, kamala's lack of political stance about anything etc etc etc.
Well the pet things stems from unfettered immigration and dumping 20k ppl in a town of 60k within 4 years
If you only heard him talking about Pets then you have selective hearing because brushing that with border control and immigration
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:37 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
How much did you know about Springfield Ohio and the crisis they are having 3 days ago?
I get your point and if no harm is done, then that's great, but this is a practice that if you repeat eventually goes to ugly places.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:38 am to VOR
quote:
Whatever. The eating pets thing came across as crazy talk to viewers…
We know. The actual truth doesn’t matter to yall. Just what you can dupe the useful idiots into believing. You are all disgusting.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:38 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
What an odd retort.
Not for him. Most of his responses on this topic have been a straw man/appeal to ridicule.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:41 am to LB84
Cutting heads off of ducks and eating them @ 2 mins in
looting grocery stores and gutting road kill, stealing animals from farmers @4 mins
looting grocery stores and gutting road kill, stealing animals from farmers @4 mins
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:41 am to TigerDoc
quote:
I think JD shouldn't be asking people to spread these rumors without any credible reports.
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 9:42 am
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:41 am to Flats
The immigrants should be subject to the law and afforded due process just like everybody else. If there's proof of them committing crimes, they should be prosecuted. People should be able to share their experiences, but politicians shouldn't selectively encourage the sharing of rumors of crime that law enforcement agencies haven't even verified. Right?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:43 am to TigerDoc
quote:
but politicians shouldn't selectively encourage the sharing of rumors of crime that law enforcement agencies haven't even verified. Right?

Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:45 am to TigerDoc
quote:
but politicians shouldn't selectively encourage the sharing of rumors of crime that law enforcement agencies haven't even verified.
They do it literally every day with Trump.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:45 am to TigerDoc
quote:
The immigrants should be subject to the law and afforded due process just like everybody else. If there's proof of them committing crimes, they should be prosecuted. People should be able to share their experiences, but politicians shouldn't selectively encourage the sharing of rumors of crime that law enforcement agencies haven't even verified. Right?
I was polite, I answered your question. One more try:
quote:
FFS, just answer the question. Do you think no Haitian migrants have snatched a duck or goose from the local park? These citizens, black & white, old & young, are just making all this shite up?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:46 am to TigerDoc
You’ve proven yourself to be a complete idiot the last 9 years, so I wouldn’t expect you to understand the irony of anything you’re posting.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:47 am to TigerDoc
quote:
but politicians shouldn't selectively encourage the sharing of rumors of crime that law enforcement agencies haven't even verified. Right?
Please call your advisor, Adam Schiff, and tell him this.
Good for the goose, good for the gander.... Well if there are geese left, that is.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:47 am to TigerDoc
quote:
politicians shouldn't selectively encourage the sharing of rumors of crime that law enforcement agencies haven't even verified. Right?
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:48 am to lsuguy84
The MFer is literally wrong about everything. He’s batting zero on this site yet he still shows up to lecture everyone on how infallible his favorite leftist media narratives are.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:50 am to TigerDoc
quote:
this is a practice that if you repeat eventually goes to ugly places.
Yes, if they keep dumping 20k “migrants” on small towns in middle America, things could get ugly.
Though I think you’re talking about the practice of complaining about them doing so.
This post was edited on 9/11/24 at 9:50 am
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:51 am to Flats
They may be right, Flats. Of course. The way pols typically handle this is to encourage people to work with local LEO's and not poast.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:51 am to Dawgfanman
Let’s not gloss over the fact that the Springfield case is an example of the administration flying in migrants on our dime so they can get the border encounter numbers down.
Posted on 9/11/24 at 9:52 am to TigerDoc
You don’t do that. Ever. You lap up every rumor about Trump without fail.
So why should we?
So why should we?
Popular
Back to top



0






