Started By
Message

When will whites start using the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to sue the government

Posted on 4/4/21 at 12:57 pm
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57835 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 12:57 pm
quote:

Civil Rights Act of 1964

No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.



With the Feds giving money selectively to black farmers and some states hading out monthly payments only to blacks, when will the lawsuits start?
It’s clearly illegal.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
17915 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 12:58 pm to
When they start arresting Democrats for their crimes.
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:00 pm to
While I manage my expectations, I refuse to give up hope. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would be a logical avenue.

Will AggieHank be will be along shortly to extinguish that flame?
Posted by ChuckO1975
Member since Feb 2021
1292 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

When will whites start using the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to sue the government




Bruh, that was written specifically to frick us. It will never, ever be allowed to protect Whites. Ever.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57835 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Bruh, that was written specifically to frick us. It will never, ever be allowed to protect Whites. Ever.


The wording is explicitly plain. No person shall be discriminated on the bases of skin color
This post was edited on 4/4/21 at 1:04 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

While I manage my expectations, I refuse to give up hope. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would be a logical avenue.

Will AggieHank be will be along shortly to extinguish that flame?
Not at all. It would be an interesting test case
Posted by MJforPrez
Member since Dec 2020
445 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

The wording is explicitly plain. No person shall be discriminated on the bases of skin color


The conversation is playing out in my head and goes something like this:

White person: “hey wait, according to the CRA of 1964, it says no one should be discriminated against based on skin color...”
Democrat of any color: “that’s right.”
White person: “so how come you’re giving POC precedence over white people?”
Dem: “because you’re white and we want revenge.”

And no one will say anything.
Posted by azcatiger
somewhere
Member since Mar 2011
4471 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:11 pm to
I think we see a case this year. Not sure if media will cover it but it should happen. For example, The Covid Vaccine prioritization is a clear violation of the Civil rights act.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57835 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I think we see a case this year. Not sure if media will cover it but it should happen. For example, The Covid Vaccine prioritization is a clear violation of the Civil rights act


It sure is
Posted by ChuckO1975
Member since Feb 2021
1292 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

The wording is explicitly plain. No person shall be discriminated on the bases of skin color


Yeah, how's that working out for White people? If you haven't caught on to the scam of the civil rights era by now, I'd start looking at who these "heroes" really were and what they really wanted.

The Civil Rights Act will never be applied in defense of Whites. Ever.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57835 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Yeah, how's that working out for White people?


How many have sued the Feds using the Act?
Posted by ChuckO1975
Member since Feb 2021
1292 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

White person: “hey wait, according to the CRA of 1964, it says no one should be discriminated against based on skin color...”
Democrat of any color: “that’s right.”
White person: “so how come you’re giving POC precedence over white people?”
Dem: “because you’re white and we want revenge.”


First they deny, then they justify.

>What even is White? It's not even a real thing. There is no such thing as race, it's a social construct

>yes, we are replacing you, destroying your institutions and using the system against you, but you deserve it because of xxxx (fake and gay reason)

Look, this is a war on us. Period. There is nothing more that needs to be explained. They will say and do anything to eliminate us.

It's time to recognize reality.
This post was edited on 4/4/21 at 1:16 pm
Posted by ZZTIGERS
Member since Dec 2007
17066 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Not at all. It would be an interesting test case

What about the Vermont vaccine decree? Everyone is eligible 16 & older expect white people. Is that just an “interesting test case” or a slam dunk, IYO?
Posted by ChuckO1975
Member since Feb 2021
1292 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

How many have sued the Feds using the Act?


Be my guest. I'm all for it, I didn't mean to imply I'm not. Don't expect to win the case though. That battle should be fought as a coordinated war cry to Whites with no real concern over winning any legal precedent.
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:17 pm to
“No standing”
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57835 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

No standing”


It said,” no person can be discriminated based on skin color. I’m a person. I have skin.
This post was edited on 4/4/21 at 1:26 pm
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
16165 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:31 pm to
Will not get far. The people in charge of enforcing the law...are in support of the ones who are racist.



Critical race theory is in every government agency.

Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35951 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:32 pm to
If whites are going to use something from 1964 to protect us, watch Mississippi Burning.
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

It said,” no person can be discriminated based on skin color. I’m a person. I have skin.


They pack the Court and it won’t make a darn what the statute says.

I was, however, being facetious for the most part.
Posted by Sooner5030
Desert Southwest
Member since Sep 2014
1712 posts
Posted on 4/4/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

With the Feds giving money selectively to black farmers and some states hading out monthly payments only to blacks, when will the lawsuits start?
It’s clearly illegal.


I think the intent is that it would allow for Black farmers that never received a settlement from some USDA claims long ago regarding loans or something....would get paid.

The problem is they didnt really require any kind of burden of proof that you were one of those farmers harmed by the USDA loan program some decades ago.
This post was edited on 4/4/21 at 1:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram