- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The party of small government now wants the government to interfere in an individual's medical decisions. What changed, guys? When will you go back to what you claim are your values?
It isn't an individuals medical decision.
It is one persons decision that ends the life of another unique person.
If the woman wanted to have a tubal ligation, I wouldn't care.
If she wanted to have a hysterectomy, I wouldn't care.
I do care when she has another human being killed.
0
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Viability. Obviously. Were birth to be induced, the baby would have a reasonable chance of surviving, so the mother doesn't have to be forced to continue the pregnancy (though obviously better for the future baby if she does).
So according to this once the baby reaches viability the mother should be able to make the decision to deliver that baby right then and there.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
She used to try and leave the impression she was a doctor........but then, stepped on her proverbial dick
damn I'm sorry I missed this thread.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
In a sense it did, by not properly equipping her with the knowledge and tools to prevent pregnancy and not properly allowing for a situation in which raising a child would be beneficial.
You proved me right beyond all doubt.
You are an enabler...
You advocate policies that will ensure that lazy, poor, uneducated people who can't afford kids continue to breed when they should not .....
Those breeders will further ensure that millions of children will suffer and starve because of the lazy, irresponsible (in)action of their "parents" and the Democrats who enable them...
YOU and Democrats like you are the reason so many BORN children suffer, NOT Republicans who seek to end welfare fraud or care about the unborn....
The answer isn't more abortions, the answer is hurting peoples feelings and telling them that the checks are gonna stop if they can't use their brains instead of their genitals.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Viability. Obviously. Were birth to be induced, the baby would have a reasonable chance of surviving, so the mother doesn't have to be forced to continue the pregnancy (though obviously better for the future baby if she does).
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to Nguyener
quote:
And a child cannot survive without a guardian.
Fundamentally different - anyone can be the child's guardian. Only one person can carry the pregnancy.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to civiltiger07
quote:It was an epic beatdown.
She used to try and leave the impression she was a doctor........but then, stepped on her proverbial dick
damn I'm sorry I missed this thread.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:20 pm to BamaAtl
Why are we even arguing anymore in this thread?
Bama's entire premise was that "bodily autonomy" was paramount and then.........she fricking drops this after like 30 pages.
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Bama's entire premise was that "bodily autonomy" was paramount and then.........she fricking drops this after like 30 pages.
quote:
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:20 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
So are you actually a doctor?quote:
Yep!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:20 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Sweet, found someone on board with forced transplant donations!
To take an absolutist position on abortion as the recent Alabama bill does is wrong. I don't agree with it and I think women have a say in their health and reproductive choices.
If that triggers some posters here, sorry but I think that is a pretty mainstream view.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:21 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
In this scenario, someone's rights are being violated
Yeah. A baby is being murdered because it's inconvenient.
quote:
As a society, we've chosen for 40 years to acknowledge that the pregnant woman's rights supersede those of the fetus.
Suddenly, Republicans want to do a 180 on this.
Democrats in 1845:
As a human race we decided slavery was fine for thousands of years and suddenly Americans want to do a 180 on this.
Democrats in 1945:
For 100 years we chosen to acknowledge that the rights of whites supercede the rights of blacks and now people want to do a 180 on this.
This complete and total reliance and unquestioning loyalty to government action is terrifying. Wake up.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:21 pm to redfishfan
quote:
Which is ever changing.
Oh no, better science might make us have to update some laws.
The horror!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:21 pm to civiltiger07
I'd bet a PHD that ask people to call them Doctor instead of an actual MD.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:22 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Oh no, better science might make us have to update some laws.
Why ignore the second part of that post? I mean I know why but I'd like to see you say it yourself.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:22 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Viability. Obviously. Were birth to be induced, the baby would have a reasonable chance of surviving, so the mother doesn't have to be forced to continue the pregnancy (though obviously better for the future baby if she does).
Have you not been paying attention?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:23 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
She used to try and leave the impression she was a doctor........but then, stepped on her proverbial dick
Wait...fake charity work AND fake credentials?!?
PLEASE fill us in!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:23 pm to cahoots
quote:
When conception first occurs, that cluster of cells is more an extension of the mother than it is a separate being. Over the 9 months, it slowly moves from being part of the mother to being separate. There isn't really a magical place to draw a line in the sand. So, we are left to choose somewhat arbitrary points in time like heartbeats or trimesters.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:24 pm to oogabooga68
quote:She must have the day off from pulling urinalysis cups all day.
Wait...fake charity work AND fake credentials?!?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:24 pm to 14&Counting
quote:Why, and by what standard are you judging it as wrong?
To take an absolutist position on abortion as the recent Alabama bill does is wrong.
quote:Even if it means killing another person?
I don't agree with it and I think women have a say in their health and reproductive choices.
quote:Why does it being mainstream matter? Is morality or truth determined by consensus?
If that triggers some posters here, sorry but I think that is a pretty mainstream view.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:24 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Viability. Obviously. Were birth to be induced, the baby would have a reasonable chance of surviving, so the mother doesn't have to be forced to continue the pregnancy
So the mother should have the right to induce labor when a Dr. says the fetus is viable. That's the logic you are using.
Page 42 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News