Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

some Republicans are re: undocumented immigrant children, but I'm certainly not.





You are a cartoon.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Well, some Republicans are re: undocumented immigrant children, but I'm certainly not.
Hey oxygen thief, prove that and it better not be another fricking opinion piece. We know you can't.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

How then do you deal with the violation of the bodily autonomy by having someone place a penis in the mother's vagina?


If it was done without consent, that's rape. Duh. Otherwise, the woman chose to get busy.
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Why then is it against federal law to interfere with the eggs of sea turtles?


And states that have additional charges, in dwi accident cases, etc, for killing a baby in the womb, would also be "unconstitutional"

Was it the evil NY bill that also include relief for the suspect in domestic violence cases, where the baby was killed?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26097 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

It's an argument for abortion - the mother can't be forced to give up her autonomy to carry a fetus to term.




You can't deal with the issue of subjecting the rights of the fetus except to declare it has no rights ipse dixit. That's why you can't win the argument. It is all made up hocum. It isn't a human. It has no rights. It is not viable. None of which has a rational or logical basis.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

A lot of republicans agree there are exceptions


The law just signed in Alabama (but which will clearly never go into effect) makes no exceptions.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

You are a cartoon.
and even more than that, a coward.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
79738 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:21 am to
They care about.

They just don't want to ignore the body within a body.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Only considered by radicals as "non-viable" because you kill it.


No, non-viable because no fetus removed from the womb at 6 weeks can survive.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14977 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:21 am to
quote:

The law just signed in Alabama (but which will clearly never go into effect) makes no exceptions.


So if exceptions for rape and health of the mother are included would you support it?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26097 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

If it was done without consent, that's rape. Duh. Otherwise, the woman chose to get busy.


So autonomy does give way as a matter of consent. And as we know, consent to the act is also consent to all natural consequences of said act. QED.

Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37667 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Otherwise, the woman chose to get busy.


Actions have consequences.

It’s stupid easy to not get pregnant. Between condoms, birth control, plan b, and pulling out (not by itself), it’s damn near impossible to get knocked up unless that is the goal.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33204 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:22 am to
[quote]When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?[quote]
The instant that Hussein said I was required to participate in the health care industry. He caused me to be vested. So deal with it, or get rid of that requirement


Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy


Why do you hate children?

Why do you and all Democrats want to see children starve and suffer?

The policies you support ENABLE bad parents to continue to have babies that will suffer due to uncaring parents and uncaring Democrats....

Democrats are ENABLERS whose policies will ensure that generation after generation will spawn new parasites who grow to be angry and ignorant because their childhoods were spent being raised by people who were relieved of any and all concepts of personal responsibility....

One or two generations of "tough love" and ENDING THE DEMOCRAT POLICY of paying lazy, uncaring people TO BREED AND VOTE would prevent the suffering of millions of children.

When you see a poor, starving child, it's thanks to the Left because they believe their should be no repercussions for having 10 different kids by 10 different baby daddy's.........

Truth be told, people like BamaAxis hate the kids that are born almost as much as they hate the unborn...
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4341 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

BamaAtl


I have made my one snarky comment in this thread so I wont make another.

Please examine your position and make a real consideration of the arguments against it. Consider if you are wrong about what constitutes "life" then consider what that means we are guilty of as a society.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41184 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:22 am to
quote:

So if exceptions for rape and health of the mother are included would you support it?


Answer this question troll
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

No, non-viable because no fetus removed from the womb at 6 weeks can survive.




no infant left on its own at 6 months can survive.

Not justification for killing it.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:23 am to
quote:

If abortions are made legal in terms in cases of rape and when the mothers health is at risk can we make all other abortions 100% illegal?


No, because an individual has a right to decide her own health decisions and the state can't force her to give up bodily autonomy for another life.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Not justification for killing it.
That coward doesn't care. Just another slave for her "masters" that can't think for herself.
Posted by Bayoubred
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2011
4075 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:24 am to


That is the lamest argument against us ever!! When were we EVER in favor of scalding or butchering or sucking the brains out of babies in the womb?

The real question is, when did dems decide that butchering babies in and out of the womb was somehow a "wrong" and women screwing everything that walks was a "right?"
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram