Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:57 am to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Hell, babies aren't viable outside the womb for quite some time on their own..........


That's not what viability means in this context. You know that. Be better.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21088 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Thread is 22 pages. Question still stands
Shorty, she isn't going to answer because she can't provide anything to substantiate her BS. Perhaps if she did, we might be enlightened
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41184 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Why have the Dems not put forth a law allowing abortions ONLY under the exceptions you list and outlaw it for convenience?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Not when the one being kept alive is being done so at the expense of bodily autonomy for the other.


Nice try. But in your kidney analogy, the person you want to kill for their kidney played NO ROLE WHATSOEVER in the fact you need a kidney.

Again, your problem is, you don't recognize that in your analogy, the person being killed for their kidney is the baby and, the person doing the killing is the mom.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:58 am to
quote:

the rights of the fetus supersede her rights.



your rights supersede mine because I am not allowed to strangle you
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:59 am to
quote:

No, sex doesn't always end in pregnancy, but it is the one thing that can cause it.


IVF. You'd do better not to traffic in absolutes - this isn't the Q thread where anyone who points out your bullshite has their post deleted and gets a DM about not pissing off the idiots.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:59 am to
quote:

So she can't do whatever the frick she likes with her body - the rights of the fetus supersede her rights.

Why?


For the same reason your right to stay alive supersedes my right to kill you for your kidneys.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:59 am to
quote:

there is no functional difference 1 week outside the womb versus 2 weeks prior to that point other than location.


A 6-week old fetus removed from the womb and one that wasn't would look fundamentally VERY different 2 weeks later.

I think we can all agree on that.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:59 am to
quote:

That's not what viability means in this context. You know that. Be better.

Well then, you placed viability at fricking womb exit...........be better
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

We honestly don't care what the woman does with HER body.


Unless she chooses not to continue a pregnancy - which affects HER body.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

A 6-week old fetus removed from the womb and one that wasn't would look fundamentally VERY different 2 weeks later.

I think we can all agree on that.


A baby born tomorrow will look pretty much exactly the same as it did yesterday.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464968 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Unless she chooses not to continue a pregnancy - which affects HER body.


Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41184 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Why have the Dems not put forth a law allowing abortions ONLY under the exceptions you list and outlaw it for convenience?


I’ve got it saved in copy and paste. Answer the question
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Unless she chooses not to continue a pregnancy - which affects HER body.



Again, your problem is, you don't recognize that in your analogy, the person being killed for their kidney is the baby and, the person doing the killing is the mom.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47841 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:01 pm to
weak sauce - git that shite outta here - would rather have diluted ketchup than this red watery shite.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134134 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Jesus


Didn't get aborted until 1720+ weeks or so, so....
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

In one scenario, a person doesn't have to do anything at all in order for two people to live.


Not true at all - they have to carry a baby to term, which carries a whole host of risks.

The question wasn't really about action vs inaction, though - it was about state mandating a choice.

Why are you okay with the state mandating one choice, but not the other? Lives are involved in both cases.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Unless she chooses not to continue a pregnancy - which affects HER body.


Her body and the child's body are intertwined for the duration of the pregnancy. No way around it.

Yes, for the duration of the pregnancy, the childs right to life trumps the mothers right to have a vacuum stuck up her snatch.

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Not true at all - they have to carry a baby to term, which carries a whole host of risks.

The question wasn't really about action vs inaction, though - it was about state mandating a choice.

Why are you okay with the state mandating one choice, but not the other? Lives are involved in both cases.


Again, your problem is, you don't recognize that in your analogy, the person being killed for their kidney is the baby and, the person doing the killing is the mom.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Always moving the goalposts


It's not moving the goalposts when you have to drag them back to their original place because some of you either don't understand the term or are purposefully redefining it so your arguments are only 50% as bad.
Jump to page
Page First 23 24 25 26 27 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 25 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram