- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to BamaAtl
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to BamaAtl
quote:
violated her rights and killed it without her consent.
The murder charge for killing a baby doesn't rely on consent from the mother any more than it does viability. A women can't, legally, hire someone to kill her and her unborn baby....despite your belief in her "autonomy". If she does so, the person who committed the act will be charged with two murders...viable fetus or not..consent or not.
0
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to BamaAtl
quote:
If that were the 100% guaranteed outcome and if contraception were widely available and 100% effective and if rape/abuse never happened, sure.
But none of that happens in that way, so we have to account for uncertainty. Clearly.
so then you would be fine with limiting abortion to pregnancies caused by rape?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to BamaAtl
quote:
When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?
When the decision affects two bodies.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to CptRusty
quote:
And just like that, we're at the part where we try to use the exception to prove the rule.
If you don't consider all scenarios, you're just trying to legislate like a moron. Which I know is a hallmark of Republicans, but we can all try to help you to be better.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:45 am to CptRusty
It's about time for Bamatool to run off to urinalysis cups.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:45 am to therick711
quote:Keep in mind BamaSJW is in favor of government-run healthcare to “save money”.
Well, let's go ahead and kill the terminally ill.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:46 am to CptRusty
quote:
So again, am I allowed to walk into an ICU and start killing people who are on life support?
People who are surviving with medical intervention =/= a fetus at 6 weeks.
You guys are so slow today.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:46 am to BamaAtl
quote:
"grave risk to the life of the mother" isn't all we're talking about here. There are many more risks involved with pregnancy than death.
You said earlier in the thread there were no exceptions...you haven't read the bill have you?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:46 am to BamaAtl
quote:Brilliant!
but we can all try to help you to be better.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:46 am to BamaAtl
quote:
If you don't consider all scenarios, you're just trying to legislate like a moron. Which I know is a hallmark of Republicans, but we can all try to help you to be better.
There is no legislation. The current state of affairs is the result of three dishonest logically bankrupt court decisions. They will be relegated to Plessy status soon, but not soon enough.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:46 am to BamaAtl
quote:
People who are surviving with medical intervention =/= a fetus at 6 weeks.
You guys are so slow today.
In many state, when it comes to murder charges for someone ending their life, they do =.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:47 am to BamaAtl
quote:Her right to do what she wants with her body is most certainly superseded by the right of another person to exist.
She has the right to not have her bodily autonomy superseded by another.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:47 am to BamaAtl
This isnt about the rights women have for controlling their body. That straw man needs to be put to rest. Women absolutely have control of their own body. They can control, almost entirely, if they get pregnant. They control if they choose to take a morning after pill to prevent unwanted pregnancies. They choose to know or not know about the possibility of pregnancy within 3 weeks of sexual contact - before there is a detectable heartbeat.
This is about murder. If it has a heartbeat, it’s alive. Your rights end when they disrupt the basic right to life of someone else.
This is about murder. If it has a heartbeat, it’s alive. Your rights end when they disrupt the basic right to life of someone else.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:47 am to BamaAtl
quote:
If you don't consider all scenarios, you're just trying to legislate like a moron. Which I know is a hallmark of Republicans, but we can all try to help you to be better.
What a load of crap! Earlier I asked if we consider all cases and make abortion legal for cases of rape and health of the mother is compromised. And you still wanted to support abortions for convenience.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 10:50 am
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:48 am to BamaAtl
quote:
you're just trying to legislate like a moron.
Why do you and your fellow Democrats support policies that will result in the suffering and starvation of millions of children?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:48 am to LSUGrrrl
Bamaatl thinks we live in Papua New Guinea where contraception isn't available and some people aren't even sure what causes pregnancy
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:49 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
If someone beat you about the head and face, would describe thst assailant as “maintaining bodily autonomy”?
That's a pretty good explanation of why one person's rights don't supersede another's.
Now apply it to abortion, and you're almost there!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
non-sapient organism
I’d ask what your definition is of this as your continued usage of it demonstrates some pretty serious stupidity. But there’s no real reason to engage with you in any way other than pointing and laughing.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:50 am to BamaAtl
quote:Uhhhh...
That's a pretty good explanation of why one person's rights don't supersede another's.
Now apply it to abortion,
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:50 am to CptRusty
quote:
so then you would be fine with limiting abortion to pregnancies caused by rape?
If you believe that, you've clearly not been reading the thread.
Page 10 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News