- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What these judges (and CJ Roberts) need to remember is Trump has the pardon power
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can't wait for the next DEM administration to wield this power.
You cant be that bif of a dumbass.
That is EXACTLY what the dems have been doing for a decade. They made the rules to the game and you act all high and mighty when republicans play by those rules.
GTFOH
1
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can't wait for the next DEM administration to wield this power. A "Unified Executive" who answers neither to Congress or the courts. What could go wrong?
I knew this would be a beauty.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:42 am to alphaandomega
quote:
That is EXACTLY what the dems have been doing for a decade.
It is not.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:43 am to udtiger
quote:
Trump has the pardon power
He also has the power to revoke TS clearances. Including for judges. Like this a-hole who sat on the FISA bullshite Russia, Russia, Russia case.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:52 am to SlowFlowPro
the court has no means to compel a president to act, not just this president, but any president. any enforcement mechanism that the court might use to compel a president would in fact rest with the executive branch.
they didn't teach you that in internet law school? or did you just forget it 400,000 post ago.
you're an idiot.
they didn't teach you that in internet law school? or did you just forget it 400,000 post ago.
you're an idiot.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:52 am to BozemanTiger
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:56 am to Clockwatcher68
Who is going to enforce some district judge's order? Tell them to GFT.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can't wait for the next DEM administration to wield this power. A "Unified Executive" who answers neither to Congress or the courts. What could go wrong?
Hey, we been seeing this for many years. Where have you been at?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:15 am to udtiger
If SCOTUS doesn't reign in these judges, and quick, Trump will completely and permanently neuter the courts.
I dont think it goes that far, the appellate courts should handle this ...either way a district court judge is not going to stand in the way of gang members and literal terrorists being deported...the the us president has many more tools in his toolbox than a federal district judge..especially one that has a known anti-trump bias and a kid whose business is literally providing support to illegal aliens
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who do the courts answer to?
The Constitution.
I present to you the moment when someone thinks their answer is super duper clever, but it’s dumb as frick.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's a weird melt for being upset with jurisdiction granted to courts via Congress,
Non sequitur, I am not criticizing their role , only the corruption and enablement by the bar association because they are staffed with the same corrupt lunatics.
And if you believe my statement was a melt, it's your own emotional attachment to your broken profession that's causing your delusion.
quote:
which both sides like to use to thwart their opponents when the opponents are in power.
Only the most staggering cowards use "both sides" at this point.
quote:
Why would I engage in histrionics? I'm no Leftist.
Original argument confirmed, ty.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:03 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
, I am not criticizing their role , only the corruption and enablement by the bar association because they are staffed with the same corrupt lunatics.
Bas associations have nothing to do with jurisdiction given to federal courts via Congressional act
quote:
Only the most staggering cowards use "both sides" at this point.
It's not going to change because of that "both sides", which is the point you'd understand if you weren't so emotional. Congress has no appetite to change the jurisdiction of federal courts with respect these injunctive powers because it cedes too much power to the other side when the other side has the Executive branch.
So this anger you have at "bar associations" needs to be directed properly: Congress, including MAGA.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:04 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Who do the courts answer to?
Congress. Individual judges via impeachment and the institution as a whole via their enabling statutes (outside of SCOTUS which is provided for in the Constitution).
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Bas associations have nothing to do with jurisdiction given to federal courts via Congressional act
So? If they disgrace and disbar this lunatics, we'd more than likely be able to impeach these lunatics or dismiss them on behavioral grounds.
quote:
It's not going to change because of that "both sides", which is the point you'd understand if you weren't so emotiona
You've been ineffectually trying to play that card for years.
You should try (and fail) with something else.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:13 pm to udtiger
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn't reign in these judges, and quick, Trump will completely and permanently neuter the courts.
I see. So surrender without firing a shot? wont happen. Trump wants a constitutional crisis but he wanted it later not now. Its here now.
Go back and look at what Roberts said after Trumps hissy fit over the weekend.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:13 pm to Decatur
quote:
Your authoritarian impulse is noted.
So is your sandy vagina.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:23 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Perhaps instead of these useless snarky comments you could complain that these judges haven't been disbarred?
If you and everyone else, here, would leave that stupid, pretend-attorney motherfricker alone and stop replying to him, he’d eventually stop trolling and bleeding his bullshite all over this forum and there would be much less of his useless comments.
He’s trolling- nothing more. And this fricking forum replies to that little shite every time which gets him off and fuels him and encourages him to keep at it. There are threads on the first page that are 10 pages plus of just responding to his incessant trolling.
Leave that stupid fricker alone and ignore him.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:24 pm to udtiger
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn't reign in these judges, and quick, Trump will completely and permanently neuter the courts.
he could just appeal their decisions and not create a constitutional crisis.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Student loans,
quote:
Biden followed the court's order
How many times did Joe try to ram through student loan forgiveness after the SC told him no? And didn’t he try it again in early January?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:29 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
he could just appeal their decisions and not create a constitutional crisis.
Over and over again until his presidency is over and nothing that the country voted for that is within his remit gets done. Confidence in our governance continues to erode as we spin into chaos.
And these lawless so called judges are creating the crisis, not those responding to their lawlessness.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News