- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is Jeff Sessions stance on marijuana?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:24 pm to TheCaterpillar
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:24 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Most of the ones that impede State's Rights.
How about all the ones that impede State's Rights?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:25 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
Four simple moves to make the Republican Party attractive millennials.
1) Support gay marriage.
2) Stop talking abortion.
3) Oppose the Patriot Act.
4) Legalize weed.
Done. Demographic shift in favor of the right.
Yep.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:25 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
It was meant to give prosecutors, whether the individual attorney in the courtroom or the office as a whole, a chance to ensure that the law(s) being passed by Congress are just
According to what? If a law is unconstitutional, ok. Other than that, no AG should be the sole arbiter of what is just.
quote:
Is there any realistic argument that simple possession of marijuana actually matters?
Let's say the answer is no. CHANGE THE frickING LAW. There is no realistic argument as per your premise. What is stopping congress from changing the law?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:25 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
1) Be passive about gay marriage, don't fight the gays
2) Stop making abortion a major part of the platform
3) End the war on drugs
4) Legalize ewed federally but leave it up to the states
Edited, and if they did this, they would sweep every election for a decade.
ETA:
Its funny too, because sooo many conservative republicans tell me "social issues are meaningless! They aren't important!"
Well if they aren't important, change your stance on them and ALL of you fiscal and defense policy will go through.
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
whoa, it's been a long, long road (and the tide is turning, esp at the state level)
i'm also offering legit policy advice for the GOP
I don't disagree with your advice.
But, I do disagree with the notion that an AG should be criticized for upholding the law that is in place.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:28 pm to moneyg
quote:
According to what? If a law is unconstitutional, ok. Other than that, no AG should be the sole arbiter of what is just.
According to the prosecutor's discretion. That is in the very nature of the position.
quote:
What is stopping congress from changing the law?
Vested lobbying interests and Congress's tendency to avoid "rocking the boat." It is politically safer to do nothing in most situations.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:29 pm to moneyg
quote:
But, I do disagree with the notion that an AG should be criticized for upholding the law that is in place.
If a city prosecutor decided to focus on enforcing J-walking laws with a large amount of city resources, would that be something you could criticize?
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:31 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Ok pot heads and criminal sympathizers
Almost 100 years ago, the consummation of alcohol and the sell of alcohol was illegal. 150 years ago, if you were black you couldn't vote. In 20 years, marijuana will be legal. You're idiotic stance against it will be left in the dust. The fact of the matter is, you couldn't make a logical argument against it because there is no logical argument. Laws change, laws aren't perfect, just because they were put in place at some point doesn't make them invulnerable to change. We are worse off 10 fold as a nation because of the WOD. It significantly impacts the lives of our inner city communities. It creates a black market for unhealthy drugs for people with addictions, but assholes like you just want to throw them in jail. If the drugs were legal the shitty drug pushers wouldn't exist, but assholes like you created them and gave them opportunity to thrive. We wouldn't have the wild wild west on our border from cartels that want to push more and more bad drugs into our country (feeding the addicted), but assholes like you allow them to thrive with your archaic stance on it. More than likely drugs like crack, crystal meth, and many others wouldn't exist, but assholes like you perpetuate addicts and make them try and find new avenues for their addictions instead of treating them for it. But hey keep living under your rock thinking this type of stance isn't important. People like you have never done the research to think for themselves because if you did, you'd actually logically understand where i'm coming from.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:33 pm to moneyg
quote:
But, I do disagree with the notion that an AG should be criticized for upholding the law that is in place.
well i'll get real theoretical right now to show you that this isn't possible
*takes a big electronic doobie drag*
there are simply too many laws, esp at the federal level, to enforce. based on the very nature of excess, it is literally impossible to "uphold all the laws" that are in place currently. there will be decisions made on policy, politics, and resources
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:33 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:Clearly you have watched the highly accurate journalistic piece called Reefer Madness.
Each dollar allocated to marijuana related arrests takes away a dollar used to enforce laws that actually matter.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:35 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:Well if they are going to take big government positions, they might as well go all in and advocate for more taxes to support them.
If a city prosecutor decided to focus on enforcing J-walking laws with a large amount of city resources, would that be something you could criticize?
This post was edited on 11/18/16 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:36 pm to moneyg
quote:
What is stopping congress from changing the law?
$$$$$$$$
The war on drugs is a golden goose to LEO.
Good look taking that away without a bloody fight.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:38 pm to TheCaterpillar
Trump gives 2 craps about pot legislation. Sessions is a really good man. No worries.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
LEO, for profit prisons, pharmaceuticals, and even some chemical/industrial concerns all have an economic interest in keeping this illegal.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:44 pm to CorporateTiger
hell
even HRC got busted telling Wall STreet the was anti-legalization (for those financial interests)
even HRC got busted telling Wall STreet the was anti-legalization (for those financial interests)
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:50 pm to CorporateTiger
So how do you think Trump is doing so far? Lol
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:50 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
Four simple moves to make the Republican Party attractive millennials.
1) Support gay marriage.
2) Stop talking abortion.
3) Oppose the Patriot Act.
4) Legalize weed.
Done. Demographic shift in favor of the right.
And Republicans are about to let this shite walk right past them cause they still are scared of this poster

Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:52 pm to teampick
I don't think Sessions is a good choice, but there isn't a point in assessing how wellness Trump is doing until he takes office.
Maybe Sessions will surprise me... I doubt it, but you never know.
Maybe Sessions will surprise me... I doubt it, but you never know.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 1:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
This Sessions pick is really shining a light on who just bought into the cult of personality surrounding Trump. They parroted his bullshite slogans about "draining the swamp" but they don't believe in it. And neither does Trump apparently.
As an Alabamian, I was happy to see Sessions keep returning to the senate over and over, as it kept him from inflicting his horrible ideas on my state as governor or as a lawmaker. This appointment means he won't be representing my state at all any longer, which I like selfishly.
As an American, this appointment is gross. It's not only bad politics, it's bad government.
frick Jeff Sessions.
As an Alabamian, I was happy to see Sessions keep returning to the senate over and over, as it kept him from inflicting his horrible ideas on my state as governor or as a lawmaker. This appointment means he won't be representing my state at all any longer, which I like selfishly.
As an American, this appointment is gross. It's not only bad politics, it's bad government.
frick Jeff Sessions.
Posted on 11/18/16 at 2:05 pm to slackster
At the end of the day, Sessions will have to enforce the policies delegated by his employer. Trump has not been very assertive in either way regarding Marijuana or the war on drugs. Based off of his other opinions, I have to believe in his mind it would be a terrible business move and nonsensical to enforce Marijuana laws anymore than they are being enforced today.
Additionally, he has to know that he gains nothing by strengthening those laws but would benefit tremendously in the under 35 vote if he reduced them.
Sessions is not the ideal appointment for me, but let's not act like he is being appointed to SCOTUS or anything, he will still have people to answer to.
Additionally, he has to know that he gains nothing by strengthening those laws but would benefit tremendously in the under 35 vote if he reduced them.
Sessions is not the ideal appointment for me, but let's not act like he is being appointed to SCOTUS or anything, he will still have people to answer to.
Popular
Back to top



0




