- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is CISA And Why Should We Care?
Posted on 3/25/23 at 10:10 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Posted on 3/25/23 at 10:10 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
careful Toomer Deplorable will attempt to take your free speech from you when it may be mentioned who is running that right now
Geez JJJ. Are you kidding me? Disagreeing over your approach to a topic is NOT taking away your free speech.
This post was edited on 3/25/23 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 3/26/23 at 4:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And critics infrastructure....which was affected by Covid Read the law and stop changing your argument
Unlike you, I read the law before I ever posted the OP. And unlike you, I actually have reading comprehension skills.
Again, your continued copy/paste spam of the bill and your autistic fixation on the word “infrastructure” does not change the reality that nothing in the original bill gave CISA regulatory purview in the event of a pandemic. We both are repeating ourselves at this point but please reply so your obstinate retardism will once again grace the top of the board.
Posted on 3/26/23 at 5:31 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Unlike you, I read the law before I ever posted the OP
quote:
(c) Responsibilities <> .--The Director
shall--
``(1) lead cybersecurity and critical infrastructure
security programs, operations, and associated policy for the
Agency, including national cybersecurity asset response
activities;
``(2) coordinate with Federal entities, including Sector-
Specific Agencies, and non-Federal entities, including
international entities, to carry out the cybersecurity and
critical infrastructure activities of the Agency, as
appropriate;
``(3) carry out the responsibilities of the Secretary to
secure Federal information and information systems consistent
with law, including subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44,
United States Code, and the Cybersecurity Act of 2015
The law clearly not only authorizes, but compels, the agency to assess critical infrastructure security. It's not just for cyber security.
What is critical infrastructure? Let's find out!
quote:
(3) Critical infrastructure information
The term "critical infrastructure information" means information not customarily in the public domain and related to the security of critical infrastructure or protected systems—
(A) actual, potential, or threatened interference with, attack on, compromise of, or incapacitation of critical infrastructure or protected systems by either physical or computer-based attack or other similar conduct (including the misuse of or unauthorized access to all types of communications and data transmission systems) that violates Federal, State, or local law, harms interstate commerce of the United States, or threatens public health or safety;
(B) the ability of any critical infrastructure or protected system to resist such interference, compromise, or incapacitation, including any planned or past assessment, projection, or estimate of the vulnerability of critical infrastructure or a protected system, including security testing, risk evaluation thereto, risk management planning, or risk audit; or
(C) any planned or past operational problem or solution regarding critical infrastructure or protected systems, including repair, recovery, reconstruction, insurance, or continuity, to the extent it is related to such interference, compromise, or incapacitation.
Did you miss that?
quote:
nothing in the original bill gave CISA regulatory purview in the event of a pandemic.
When did they exercise "regulatory purview" during Covid?
Are you talking about the recommendations they are mandated to offer?
quote:
We both are repeating ourselves at this point but please reply so your obstinate retardism will once again grace the top of the board.
Until you read the law and stop lying, I will continue to own you by simply posting the law that refutes your assertions.
Or you can answer my questions that you've avoided. Want to try that, finally?
Posted on 3/26/23 at 6:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
(c) Responsibilities <> .--The Director
shall--
``(1) lead cybersecurity and critical infrastructure
security programs, operations, and associated policy for the
Agency, including national cybersecurity asset response
activities;
``(2) coordinate with Federal entities, including Sector-
Specific Agencies, and non-Federal entities, including
international entities, to carry out the cybersecurity and
critical infrastructure activities of the Agency, as
appropriate;
``(3) carry out the responsibilities of the Secretary to
secure Federal information and information systems consistent
with law, including subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44,
United States Code, and the Cybersecurity Act of 2015

Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:44 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Add the current thread on the “Sound of Freedom” to SFP’s Greatest Hits!
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:overstep became the sunject
quote:
You direct me to the specific language in the bill — ostensibly passed to protect against cybersecurity terror threats — which enables CISA to declare a state of de facto martial law over the entire economy because of a supposed naturally occurring biological contagion?
Whoa bud. You are the one who made the claims.
Pay attention and understand other people have things to say
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:51 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Add the current thread on the “Sound of Freedom” to SFP’s Greatest Hits!
Are you going to answer questions or continue to act in bad faith?
Posted on 6/16/24 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you going to answer questions or continue to act in bad faith?

Posted on 6/16/24 at 8:26 am to Toomer Deplorable
Acting in bad faith it is.
Posted on 6/16/24 at 8:50 am to David_DJS
quote:
I can attest to this. Follow up his signing CISA into law by mentioning he also extended FISA, and you'll ironically be called a RINO for mentioning it.
10 downvotes for pointing out objective truth. It’s wild.
Posted on 6/16/24 at 8:56 am to Flats
quote:
10 downvotes for pointing out objective truth. It’s wild.
There is a NARRATIVE, bro. The echo chamber content creators have told us what to repeat. Any diversion from the specific talking points means you're a Satanic child molesting Democrat.
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is a NARRATIVE, bro. The echo chamber content creators have told us what to repeat. Any diversion from the specific talking points means you're a Satanic child molesting Democrat.
The only narrative being exposed here is your refusal to acknowledge the documented reality that CISA is a monstrosity of misinformation and censorship.
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:38 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
The only narrative being exposed here is your refusal to acknowledge the documented reality that CISA is a monstrosity of misinformation and censorship.
Oh that's a white flag.
Changing the argument midstream
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Changing the argument midstream
Hi Glue! I’m Rubber! I’m pleased to make your acquaintance!
No asshat— there has been no changing the argument.
I asked you on the very first page to point to the language in the bill that authorized CISA to declare a state of de facto martial law over the entire economy because of a supposed naturally occurring biological contagion and all you have provided is paste & clip spam.
Yet again, keep bumping this thread. Your colossal ego provides such immense entertainment for the board!
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:38 am to Toomer Deplorable
What people don't know is CISA helped push the Russia Russia Russia hoax.
GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity
Read the report - It was released two weeks before Trump took office by the Obama lead DHS.
This was Obamas parting gift to the new administration. The entire russia hoax was planned and executed by our own 3 letter agencies to target Trump. Lot of people are completely unaware of this report.
Grizzly Steppe
GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity
Read the report - It was released two weeks before Trump took office by the Obama lead DHS.
This was Obamas parting gift to the new administration. The entire russia hoax was planned and executed by our own 3 letter agencies to target Trump. Lot of people are completely unaware of this report.
Grizzly Steppe
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:41 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
I asked you on the very first page to point to the language in the bill that authorized CISA to declare a state of de facto martial law over the entire economy
And this is a dishonest question because at no point did CISA ever "declare a state of de facto martial law over the entire economy".
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:WUT?
I said Putin (and his fans on here) citing the US intervention in 2014 was inapplicable to 2022
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:51 am to NC_Tigah
a. This thread is from 1.5 years ago
b. The point from 1.5 years ago was that, even if you want to argue the US had a puppet installed in 2014, it's irrelevant to 2022 because Zelensky ousted that puppet.
So within that hypothetical, US influence started in 2014 and ended with Zelensky's election.
b. The point from 1.5 years ago was that, even if you want to argue the US had a puppet installed in 2014, it's irrelevant to 2022 because Zelensky ousted that puppet.
So within that hypothetical, US influence started in 2014 and ended with Zelensky's election.
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And this is a dishonest question because at no point did CISA ever "declare a state of de facto martial law over the entire economy".
Utter B.S.
CISA provided the “guidelines” for determining “essential” and “nonessential” sectors of the economy.
https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/cisa-releases-guidance-essential-critical-infrastructure-workers-during-covid-19
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:53 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
CISA provided the “guidelines” for determining “essential” and “nonessential” sectors of the economy.
So my point is proven. No state of emergency. No mandate. No martial law.
Thank you for finally admitting I have been right.
Popular
Back to top


0






