Started By
Message

re: What has Q Anon correctly predicted?

Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

There's a 2000 page thread on it are you being dense on purpose?


I've been VERY respectful this entire thread. The Qanon thread is a very long thread as you alluded to.

Knowing this, i'm asking someone like you .... who admittedly has much more experience with Q Anon, to provide a brief summary of specific revelations that have come to light regarding deep state. Or for others, specific predictions that have come true.

I don't think that makes me dense and I apologize if you think it does. It's not my intention. My intention is just to get some major bullet points that has made Q so trustworthy.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 12:36 pm
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Knowing this, i'm asking someone like you .... who admittedly has much more experience with Q Anon, to provide a brief summary of specific revelations that have come to light regarding deep state. Or for others, specific predictions that have come true


If you're too lazy to do it yourself when the information is right there in front of you why would anyone else spoonfeed it to you. This is pathetic.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Nobody with sense wants to read through that rubbish


In other words you want to remain retarded. Fine with me.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:47 pm to
Why wouldn't they? This is a place to share information.

I'm going to assume you won't help out with that information?
Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 12:56 pm to


The ol troll them by pretending to want to learn more but really you are just a patronizing dumb frick.

It is a pretty good tactic, you will catch some fish.

What sort of person believes that there is not a deep state? I expect that from the cwill and bmy of the board. Not you.

I know you can't be that retarded.

The TDS crowd absolutely believed there was a deep state when W was in office. Muh WMD. Muh Halliburton. Muh starting wars for oil. Muh Patriot act.

Let me guess, you are a lawyer?

This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 12:57 pm
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:10 pm to
There probably is some form of deep state. Who or what exactly that entails i'm not sure.

I have not trolled anyone in this thread. I've asked questions but I haven't trolled.

And no, i'm not a lawyer.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 1:12 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54847 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

What does that have to do with the Pope? The Church has been having these scandals for years. A "bad May" is extremely vague. With a worldwide organization something is bound to happen. Who are the people supporting him that were pushed into the light? To be the Pope he had to get a majority of the Cardinals. I'm sure most priests support him.



Now you are being a little untruthful.

1- He called may. That's not vague.

Vague= not clearly expressed.


That's clearly expressed.


Vague= not clearly defined.

Naming the time is clearly defined.



2- Major event involving not one or 2 but 34 priests in May


Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54847 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:19 pm to
You asked for an exact. You got one and you ignore it to say that you are being very respectful.


Let's face it. You are not. And that's ok. Just stop pretending to be so.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54847 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

The ol troll them by pretending to want to learn more but really you are just a patronizing dumb frick. It is a pretty good tactic, you will catch some fish.


Yep!
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:22 pm to
I'm with you that calling May is pretty damn good.

What i don't like is the whole "those that support him will be pushed into the light. DARK to LIGHT"....

That sounds more like Cardinals. I guess it could be priest? But priest don't really "support" the pope so to speak. They are just near the bottom of the clergy ladder and have to be in line with the church by default.

However, that's pretty good jjdoc. I'm definitely looking for more concrete stuff like that.

Is Q typically involved in international affairs that don't deal with U.S internal or foreign policy?
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:23 pm to
I just forgot to get back to you. bencoleman distracted me.

You did give a good example and I appreciate it.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
19949 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Now you are being a little untruthful.

1- He called may. That's not vague.

Vague= not clearly expressed.


That's clearly expressed.


Vague= not clearly defined.

Naming the time is clearly defined.



2- Major event involving not one or 2 but 34 priests in May

i googled "priest molest march 2018" 2nd hit was a cardinal in buffalo outing not one or 2, but 42 priests as molestors. It literally works for any other month too.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
60753 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

There's a 2000 page thread on it are you being dense on purpose?

Maybe he didn't feel like reading 2000 pages of bible thumping idiots cumming into each others hands and thought that after 7 pages of this one, he might finally get a definitive answer.

Are the fricking Q-berts really treating others as though they are stupid or unenlightened? That's hilarious.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 2:19 pm to
let’s keep this thread from becoming a flame fest. I don’t want it anchored, deleted or turning into dogshit.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 2:21 pm
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Maybe he didn't feel like reading 2000 pages


Then maybe he wants to remain as ignorant as you.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67978 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 2:26 pm to
I’m not going to go through 2,000 pages so again I’ll put this to you:

I’m asking someone like you .... who admittedly has much more experience with Q Anon, to provide a brief summary of specific revelations that have come to light regarding deep state. Or for others, specific predictions that have come true. The Q thread is too long and arduous to start at page one. Do you mind providing some key specific revelations that has given Q his/their reputation as an insider?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
75427 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

i googled "priest molest march 2018" 2nd hit was a cardinal in buffalo outing not one or 2, but 42 priests as molestors. It literally works for any other month too.
Exactly. The Pope is still nice and comfortable in the Vatican.

Hey, look, I'm Q...the US will experience a dangerous weather scare in September and Trump will experience a scandal in July.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
75427 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 2:51 pm to
Q has given the heads up on nothing of any importance. Nobody has been arrested, Hillary and Her minions have not been indicted. I really wish he was real, but it was obvious from back in summer 2016 that it was simply someone throwing tons of shite against against the barn wall in hopes something would stick.

It should be obvious especially to the Q disciples that if the deep state was as coordinated as they think and Q was actually spilling secrets he'd have been rooted out long ago.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54847 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 3:03 pm to
That's my fault:

quote:

2- Major event involving not one or 2 but 34 priests in May


It's Bishops. Bishops generally have a lot of priests under them.

There are roughly 41,000 priests in the USA and 390 Bishops.


quote:

i googled "priest molest march 2018" 2nd hit was a cardinal in buffalo outing not one or 2, but 42 priests as molestors. It literally works for any other month too.


No, it does not work for every month. But to be clear, here is what you are referring to.

LINK

quote:

Buffalo bishop names 42 priests accused of abuse


A bishop...1 Bishop. What we are talking about is 34 BISHOPS.

Like I stated.... That's my fault.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
54847 posts
Posted on 6/3/18 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Nobody has been arrested,


That's not true either.


Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram