re: What happens when no one trusts elections anymore?

quote:

---

If no one believes, they will be just blatant with how bad they are cheating yet claim it works.

---

They already are. They just try to "gaslight" all of us and it is working with fewer and fewer, yet they still do it.

Once no one trusts elections they'll just stop having them. They're just there to make you feel like you have a say so in what happens in this country.

Politicians will just keep picking which of their friends they want in office

quote:

---

Paper ballots on election day only if we really want trustworthy elections. Voters must produce a valid ID.

---

Write up a list of people who aren’t able to vote on Election Day in person. It’s probably way more than you realize. I got a dozen or more people in my family who might not be able to vote in person that day. For instance depending on work schedules the domestic and international pilots and the surgeons in my family can’t get to the polls that day.

I don't see a viable path forward. The people claiming the elections are rigged are willing to believe it with essentially no evidence.

I could pull out multiple examples, but the most obvious one that comes to mind is the idea that dominion stole the election by flipping votes.

I've heard numerous people claim that a fair election requires paper ballots because the dominion machines flipped votes and stole the election. But in reality, the dominion system allows someone to make their choices, then it spits out a printed ballot which they then turn in as their vote. This gets rid of previous issues with paper ballots such as hanging chads yet maintains the benefits of having paper ballots for hand recounts. It seems like a great system. But half the country is still under the impression that this system was hacked by foreign countries because a couple of insane lawyers said so on Fox News. No amount of facts, evidence or court rulings will change their minds.

Tucker Carlson offering Sidney Powell unlimited air time to show her evidence of her claims only to have her refuse and get angry didn't change any of their minds.

Fox News paying out almost a billion dollars didn't change any of their minds.

Sidney Powell actually used the defense "no reasonable person would conclude that her statements were statements of fact" change any of their minds.

So what exactly is the state supposed to do?

quote:

---

You do realize that what you just posted is complete and total BS right? 70% believe the election was not legit. You are lying and know it. If we want BS broadcast on here we will rattle your cage.

---

It’s called an echo chamber, and yes the biggest problem with irrational people is that they think everyone agrees with them.

Well, this wasn't great either.
Democrats' stolen election claims.

quote:

---

They’ll remove Biden or he will croak & this is why the SPOH is even more important because that will be the VP if this happens.

---

The SPOH doesn't become VP just because the POTUS dies. The VPOTUS becomes POTUS and then has to select his VPOTUS who then has to be approved by majority votes in both houses of congress.

quote:

---

why vote nothing ever changes

---

Even if you don't believe in any of the election frickery, it is damn hard to argue against this.

Why would I trust them.

I don't know an single Democrat at ANY level who seems to actually care if they win by cheating. Oh, they may deny cheating and that's nice I suppose. But, I don't think they actually care if their party does it.

It's that same process
Deny
Deny
Deny
OK, well, maybe a little
OK, well, even if it happened, it had to happen because reasons
OK, but Trump had to be stopped!!!!

You NEVER see Democrats at the outset of any controversy taking a firm, "that shite is fricked up if it happened and people should go to jail if it did"...............EVER