- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are your reasons for believing climate change is "a hoax"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:29 pm to Powerman
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:29 pm to Powerman
quote:No. you need to be able to sum an energy balance, understand what a residual is, and look at sensitivities to modeler-chosen values. But hey you are good at counting things. Let’s just go with that
So every climate scientist that thinks man made climate change is real is stupid and just glossed over information that literally anyone with critical thinking skills would easily catch?
quote:
There are thousands of climate scientists that just aren't as adept at catching these things as you? Does that seem likely to be true?
where did I claim that. You do realize climate modelers are the butt of many jokes in the modeling community, right? You literally have no domain knowledge here—but are convinced you are smarter. It’s entertaining as it it curious to me. This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:30 pm
0
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:31 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's a multivariate model, self serving or not.
Didn't realize it was necessary to specify a multivariate model that wasn't bullshite.
Was hoping for a stochastic Navier-Stokes model at the very least.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:32 pm to Powerman
quote:
I'm guessing you're an old mfer.
Hey, hey...
...HEY!
Next thing you know you're going to be calling people "drunks".
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:32 pm to Powerman
quote:Da fuq?
Says the guy that gravitates toward the conspiracy theory explanation.
quote:i guess early 40’s is the new 80. You’re as crappy of a mind reader as you are a “scientist”.
I'm guessing you're an old mfer.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:33 pm to BamaAtl
quote:You do t, which is why you think you’re right! It’s hilarious.
I do, which is why it was so easy.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:34 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What I meant was that your statement shows that you don't understand how a scientific hypothesis is formulated - let alone how it's tested.
I’m just going to laugh at you. Too stupid to argue with. This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:35 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's a multivariate model, self serving or not.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:36 pm to Taxing Authority
Can’t argue with him. Like talking to a wall. Soon he’ll be calling you a racist. It’s like clockwork
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:36 pm to CFDoc
quote:
Didn't realize it was necessary to specify a multivariate model that wasn't bullshite.
He probably should have been more specific. Really, though, the IPCC has what he's looking for, he's just too lazy or incompetent to do his own work. Or maybe he won't like what he finds and knows it.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:37 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I’m just going to laugh at you
You do that a lot when you're asked to explain something clearly beyond your level.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:37 pm to CFDoc
quote:Climate modelers don’t even want to try 3D modeling.
Was hoping for a stochastic Navier-Stokes model at the very least.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:38 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Hey, hey...
...HEY!
Next thing you know you're going to be calling people "drunks".
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:38 pm to DawgCountry
quote:Its usually “Trump supporter” first.
Soon he’ll be calling you a racist. It’s like clockwork
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:42 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
I’m just going to laugh at you. Too stupid to argue with
Rich coming from a conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:44 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The role of clouds in the climate system continues to challenge the modelling of climate (e.g., Chapter 7, Section 7.2.2). It is generally accepted that the net effect of clouds on the radiative balance of the planet is negative and has an average magnitude of about 10 to 20 Wm-2. This balance consists of a short-wave cooling (the albedo effect) of about 40 to 50 Wm-2 and a long-wave warming of about 30 Wm-2. Unfortunately, the size of the uncertainties in this budget is large when compared to the expected anthropogenic greenhouse forcing. Although we know that the overall net effect of clouds on the radiative balance is slightly negative, we do not know the sign of cloud feedback with respect to the increase of greenhouse gases, and it may vary with the region. In fact, the basic issue of the nature of the future cloud feedback is not clear. Will it remain negative?
...
And yet, this question of cloud feedback remains open, and it is not clear how it will be answered. Given that the current generation of global climate models represents the Earth in terms of grid-points spaced roughly 200 km apart, many features observed on smaller scales, such as individual cloud systems and cloud geometry, are not explicitly resolved.
quote:
he's just too lazy or incompetent to do his own work. Or maybe he won't like what he finds and knows it.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:46 pm to Powerman
quote:Like I said... isht quality modeling is a poor “consipiracy theory”. But keep holding onto that. Your projection makes you seem smarter. More intellectual.
Rich coming from a conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:48 pm to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
Has this devolved to SR projecting his intellectual insecurities yet? Nothing better than trying to win an argument via a paper-thin ego squawking for attention.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:48 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
too lazy or incompetent to do his own work.
I'd put you firmly in this category as well.
Because I'm a nice guy, here's your best argument in the current meteorological literature: LINK
Let me know when you're ready for the accompanying technical discussion.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:54 pm to SleauxPlay
quote:
trying to win an argument via a paper-thin ego squawking for attention.
Wait, isn't this the TTWAAVAPTESFA Board?
Anyone looking for rational discussion regarding the climate on this board is on a fool's errand.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:55 pm to SleauxPlay
quote:
SleauxPlay
quote:
Has this devolved to SR projecting his intellectual insecurities yet? Nothing better than trying to win an argument via a paper-thin ego squawking for attention
How did you post this response from your dramatically slow down internet caused by net neutrality?
Armageddon hasn't hit your house yet
Page 31 of 40
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News