- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/20/18 at 4:13 pm to texridder
quote:
I would think so. At least some of the May 2018 caravan went to court and were granted asylum, so I assume they must have.
Ah, so "some" is the new standard. Christ almighty.
Posted on 11/20/18 at 4:20 pm to texridder
quote:
At least some of the May 2018 caravan went to court and were granted asylum,
Link?
Also,
quote:
in order to qualify for asylum, a person must meet this definition:
a person who is unable or unwilling to return to his or her home country, and cannot obtain protection in that country, due to past persecution or a well-founded fear of being persecuted in the future “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Congress incorporated this definition into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980.
Can you explain to me how this caravan fits that definition?
"We don't like being poor" is not a qualification for asylum.
Source: US Immigration Law
Posted on 11/20/18 at 4:24 pm to texridder
Why didn't you answer these questions:
Why did you only choose 1 out of 4 questions to answer?
Why did you only choose 1 out of 4 questions to answer?
quote:
Are you willing to house one of these people yourself?
Are you willing to pay the entire costs for these people?
Do you think these people will follow exact asylum procedures?
If not, what in your opinion should be the consequences?
Posted on 11/20/18 at 4:40 pm to Nguyener
quote:
quote:
in order to qualify for asylum, a person must meet this definition:
a person who is unable or unwilling to return to his or her home country, and cannot obtain protection in that country, due to past persecution or a well-founded fear of being persecuted in the future “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Congress incorporated this definition into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980.
Can you explain to me how this caravan fits that definition?
"We don't like being poor" is not a qualification for asylum.
Source: US Immigration Law
Do you think that is some kind of revelation?
Posted on 11/20/18 at 4:51 pm to texridder
To be fair...you were ignorant as to the process and timing of presenting at the border and asking for asylum. You were also ignorant to the fact that those illegally here prior to asking for asylum can still in fact be granted asylum....so it isn’t a reach for him to think you are likely ignorant to the grounds for asylum.
But we will give you the benefit of the doubt. Which of the grounds presented, that you claim to be aware of, apply to the caravan of criminals?
But we will give you the benefit of the doubt. Which of the grounds presented, that you claim to be aware of, apply to the caravan of criminals?
Posted on 11/20/18 at 5:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
BBONDS25
ES&D.
Posted on 11/20/18 at 5:10 pm to upgrayedd
quote:How long did it take you to come up with that stupid post?
Ah, so "some" is the new standard. Christ almighty.
Posted on 11/20/18 at 5:11 pm to trinidadtiger
Out of several thousand people, of course a few hundred crooks are in there. That would be true of Cajuns too more than likely.
Posted on 11/20/18 at 5:47 pm to texridder
quote:
ES&D
One of yor better posts. 
Posted on 11/20/18 at 6:10 pm to trinidadtiger
Of course there are hundreds of criminals in there because we have people embedded with them to find out what is going on.
Gee, if I was a fricking felon in Guatemala of course I would go get free shite and a clean slate somewhere else.
The whole point is to overwhelm the border where we cannot vet the mother frickers.
Gee, if I was a fricking felon in Guatemala of course I would go get free shite and a clean slate somewhere else.
The whole point is to overwhelm the border where we cannot vet the mother frickers.
Posted on 11/20/18 at 6:15 pm to BBONDS25
The spring migrant caravan. 1500 started, 401 filed asylum, to date 3 have been granted and one failed. the other odd 300 and some are now in the US, stats say only 22% will actually show up for their court date.
Exactly why they come, and with a current backlog of 600,000 it will be years before this is taken care of, much less the thousands now rushing the border. The system is fricked up for a reason, alinsky 101, overwhelm the system and stop the system from fixing itself via litigation with liberal judges and congressmen, who will then be reelected by aforementioned illegals.
Exactly why they come, and with a current backlog of 600,000 it will be years before this is taken care of, much less the thousands now rushing the border. The system is fricked up for a reason, alinsky 101, overwhelm the system and stop the system from fixing itself via litigation with liberal judges and congressmen, who will then be reelected by aforementioned illegals.
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:46 pm to bmy
quote:
Liar
explain yourselfPosted on 11/20/18 at 9:47 pm to TBoy
quote:why am i hearing the opposite of what you and bmidiot are saying?
Actually, it's just the opposite of what you said. But I won't get in the way of the right wing repeater lines
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:48 pm to texridder
quote:but that's not the whole story is it?
Applying for asylum is illegal???
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:50 pm to countrytiger60
quote:again, from what i have heard, this is not correct. they are getting in at a rapid pace.
Hey Tex. get over it. they are not getting in!
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:52 pm to Catman88
quote:technically, i think the mexican govt gave them permission to cross through in an attempt to enter the u.s.
They are applying for asylum by breaking through Mexican boarders?
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:53 pm to texridder
quote:applying for asylum is not the problem. the problem is applying for asylum in the u.s. when you are from honduras. from what i understand, the u.s. requires that you apply for asylum in mexico first. and that's only part of the problem
explain why applying for asylum is illegal?
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:54 pm to texridder
quote:
Not sure if they did or didn't. But some of the May 2018 caravan from Central America were granted asylum in the U.S.
Did judges start caring about the law recently and I wasn't informed?
Posted on 11/20/18 at 9:55 pm to texridder
quote:not everyone is in agreement that this is a good thing. moreover, it is almost certain that some of the people who came from that caravan entered illegally because of the broken system the u.s. has for processing these people. it appears that the same thing is happening again except in bigger numbers
some of those who came from Central America in the May 2018 caravan have been granted asylum in the U.S.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News