Started By
Message

re: Weekly reminder: There is ZERO proof of collusion

Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:04 am to
Posted by BamaFan365
Member since Sep 2011
2347 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:04 am to
Lol. You should probably check my post history
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35161 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:06 am to
Scaramucci is bringing in big changes to Trump's communication with the Public. Trump is doing one of his - many more to like come - Rallies, next week.

Trump can virtually FORCE Bob Meuller to INCLUDE Hillary/Dem collusion (Ukraine/Russia) to hammer Trump in the Election. And that is just a start. Trump can publically rip Meuller to shreds without even a threat of firing; in fact, it will be better for Meuller to remain...so this stays front and center.

This is the best way to guarantee a FULL expose of Dem corruption and the sorry double standard which has formerly given them criminal immunity.

I can't wait for the Rallies to start. And for Scarimucci ("the Muuch") to start 'interpreting' Trump's words.
Posted by BamaFan365
Member since Sep 2011
2347 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:09 am to
I hope you're right
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
22027 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:10 am to
Weekly reminder Collusion isn't even a crime
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:13 am to
(no message)
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Y'all have a nice fricking day.


First of all, its way too early in the week to be melting this hard. You need to pace yourself.

Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government. It doesnt even matter if the whole thing was a ruse. Thats what they THOUGHT they were there for and it clearly shows that they were willing to work with the Russians.

I know it really chaps your arse the the presidents own son copied the email chain onto Twitter so that you can't deny it as #fakenews.

I know your little pussy is so raw about it, but again, pace yourself. Its going to be a long few months.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:40 am to
quote:

I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.


Mathematically, using probabilities, you are correct...
But it is close to 0...and is a conspiracy theory...
It's about as likely as these conspiracy theories:
The Finland Conspiracy
The Lead Singer of Linkin Park was John Podesta's son Conspiracy
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government.

I realize you tried to use the scariest language possible...........but yeah. That's still a fail.

quote:

I know it really chaps your arse the the presidents own son copied the email chain onto Twitter so that you can't deny it as #fakenews.
It's real news.

It's just not collusion.

quote:

I know your little pussy is so raw
You're projecting.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:42 am to
quote:


Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government.


That's not collusion, though...we've been told many times when Ds do it, it's called opposition research...
Posted by LSUgrad08112
Member since May 2016
2925 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government

As would anyone else with a functioning brain. If you're running for office and someone randomly calls you and says "we have information that will win the election for you", we both know you're at least listening to what the person has to say. As would literally every single politician on the face of the earth. I'm not sure why this is some bewildering, character assassinating nuclear bomb to you people.
quote:

Thats what they THOUGHT they were there for and it clearly shows that they were willing to work with the Russians.


No, it shows that Trump Jr was willing to meet with someone who said that they had damaging information on Hillary Clinton. And that's it. She could've been from Papua New Guinea for all he cared, it wasn't a "Russian issue" like you're trying to make it out to be. There wasn't a vast right wing conspiracy to hack the entire United States presidential election just because Trump Jr agreed to a meeting with someone who happened to be Russian months earlier. This is called the "where there's smoke, there's fire" fallacy and the MSM is expert at taking advantage of dumbasses who are susceptible to it.

One candidate literally used a large number of American "news organizations" who donated to her campaign and openly supported her and gave her debate questions in an attempt to force her way into the presidency and no one has said a word. Obama gets caught on a hot mic saying that "we'll talk to Vladimir in private where I'll have more flexibility" and no reporting or speculation on that whatsoever. Trump Jr takes a meeting with someone claiming to have damaging info on Hillary Clinton and "MUH RUSSIAN ELECTION HACKING MUST BE TRUE". Leftism is a mental illness
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35161 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government.


And this is somehow...what...criminal? Immoral? Impractical? Or rather...perfectly justifiable as becoming a future Agent of our Nation hoping to MAGA.

Trump Jr. stated that His knowledge of the whole ugly and "unreported" aspect of the overtly corrupt Hillary/Uranium One scandal, is EXACTLY WHY he took the meeting from who he believed could offer real and credible EVIDENCE of Russian manipulation of Hillary Clinton. Who could better do so than a real (supposed) Russian Insider/Agent...the WAPO? And I suppose that you believe he should have passed up this chance? If he did, I'd expect Trump to fire his Son, instead of employ Him!

Jesus Christ? Black is white...up is down!
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22072 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:29 am to
It really is impossible to underestimate your lack of knowledge of basic fact.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
75008 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:32 am to
quote:

AUbused


Nice melt
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I'm not sure why this is some bewildering, character assassinating nuclear bomb to you people.



After months of the Trump admin and Trumpsuckers, such as yourself, claiming that there was not a shred of truth to "Muh Russians"........ that you claim the Trump Jr. meeting is inconsequential is laughable.

Its ok though, because short of being straight up mongoloid retarded, noone can make the intellectual contortions that you guys do and not know they are lying to themselves. You know it. I know it. We all know it.

Theres nothing more that needs to be said. We'll just await the findings of special council.
Posted by LSUgrad08112
Member since May 2016
2925 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:05 am to
quote:

After months of the Trump admin and Trumpsuckers, such as yourself, claiming that there was not a shred of truth to "Muh Russians"........ that you claim the Trump Jr. meeting is inconsequential is laughable.


First of all, I'm claiming that there's not a shed of truth to "muh Russians hacked the election and that's why Trump is in office". I've already explained in an earlier post what the media means by "muh Russians". I'm sorry that you're too stupid to realize that two completely separate events (Trump supposedly using Russians to hack the election and Jr meeting with a Russian lady for political dirt) don't have any bearing on each other. Trump can throw a party for every single Russian politician in the Kremlin and say that they're the greatest people on earth, it still doesn't change the fact that there has never been any "collusion with the Russians to hack the election". It never happened. Get over it.
quote:

its ok though, because short of being straight up mongoloid retarded, noone can make the intellectual contortions that you guys do and not know they are lying to themselves. You know it. I know it. We all know it

how funny coming from someone like you. I know that you DESPERATELY want to make the connection between Trump and Russia "hacking muh election", but again, you're too stupid/biased/blind/whatever to see that there's nothing there.

What's your assertion about Trump exactly? That he's made completely legal, run of the mill political contact with Putin as every other president has done with other political figures from major countries and that his son took a meeting with some Russian DNC plant who claimed to have damaging info on Hillary Clinton? Sure. It happened. Who gives a shite? I don't see a problem with any other politicians doing it, so I'm not going to start caring now that Trump has. Which is exactly why I think you're a moron and a hypocrite

Or is your assertion that he won the election because he "colluded with Russia"? Because that's fricking ridiculous and, again, has been proven false in many, many different ways.

It's hilarious that you'll call me retarded when you and your ilk have been obsessing over something that was proven by the project veritas leaks to be complete bullshite but you're still repeating "Trump talked to Putin once! GOTCHA!" over and over and over. Do a little research so you don't sound completely clueless next time, friend.
quote:

Theres nothing more that needs to be said. We'll just await the findings of special council

Spoiler: they won't find anything incriminating so they'll just make a bunch of loose connections between some random Trump associate and some random Russian meeting/speaking/whatever through completely legitimate, legal, and ethical means, but they'll phrase it in a way that sounds scary so dumbfricks like you will keep yelling "muh Russian hacks" and deflecting from real issues.
Posted by StickD
Houston
Member since Apr 2010
10838 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Its going to be a long few YEARS

AUshortbused fify
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Spoiler: they won't find anything incriminating so they'll just make a bunch of loose connections between some random Trump associate


By random Trump associate you mean son, son-in-law, and campaign manager.

Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:47 am to
quote:

There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm.

Do you really think that the MSM is going to admit they colluded with the DNC/Hillary campaign to influence the election? Because that's the only collusion that happened.

MAGA
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Theres nothing more that needs to be said. We'll just await the findings of special council


If the dems knew what was good for them they'd shut the frick up but they won't and can't and it's going to cost them. Indictments are coming. I'd say Rice is a goner for sure. Lynch is cooperating in an attempt to save herself. The rest of the gang is toast.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53078 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:59 am to
quote:

I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.




So, there's no proof, but you still want to examine the possibilities of it happening based on that absence of proof?

Can we also investigate a link between Maxine Waters and the Roswell landing? I mean, i have no idea if Waters is a space alien or not, but it would be myopic to th be 100% convinced she isn't a space alien.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram