- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Weekly reminder: There is ZERO proof of collusion
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:04 am to LSUgrad08112
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:04 am to LSUgrad08112
Lol. You should probably check my post history
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:06 am to BamaFan365
Scaramucci is bringing in big changes to Trump's communication with the Public. Trump is doing one of his - many more to like come - Rallies, next week.
Trump can virtually FORCE Bob Meuller to INCLUDE Hillary/Dem collusion (Ukraine/Russia) to hammer Trump in the Election. And that is just a start. Trump can publically rip Meuller to shreds without even a threat of firing; in fact, it will be better for Meuller to remain...so this stays front and center.
This is the best way to guarantee a FULL expose of Dem corruption and the sorry double standard which has formerly given them criminal immunity.
I can't wait for the Rallies to start. And for Scarimucci ("the Muuch") to start 'interpreting' Trump's words.
Trump can virtually FORCE Bob Meuller to INCLUDE Hillary/Dem collusion (Ukraine/Russia) to hammer Trump in the Election. And that is just a start. Trump can publically rip Meuller to shreds without even a threat of firing; in fact, it will be better for Meuller to remain...so this stays front and center.
This is the best way to guarantee a FULL expose of Dem corruption and the sorry double standard which has formerly given them criminal immunity.
I can't wait for the Rallies to start. And for Scarimucci ("the Muuch") to start 'interpreting' Trump's words.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:10 am to bamarep
Weekly reminder Collusion isn't even a crime
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:18 am to bamarep
quote:
Y'all have a nice fricking day.
First of all, its way too early in the week to be melting this hard. You need to pace yourself.
Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government. It doesnt even matter if the whole thing was a ruse. Thats what they THOUGHT they were there for and it clearly shows that they were willing to work with the Russians.
I know it really chaps your arse the the presidents own son copied the email chain onto Twitter so that you can't deny it as #fakenews.
I know your little pussy is so raw about it, but again, pace yourself. Its going to be a long few months.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:40 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.
Mathematically, using probabilities, you are correct...
But it is close to 0...and is a conspiracy theory...
It's about as likely as these conspiracy theories:
The Finland Conspiracy
The Lead Singer of Linkin Park was John Podesta's son Conspiracy
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:40 am to AUbused
quote:
Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government.
I realize you tried to use the scariest language possible...........but yeah. That's still a fail.
quote:It's real news.
I know it really chaps your arse the the presidents own son copied the email chain onto Twitter so that you can't deny it as #fakenews.
It's just not collusion.
quote:You're projecting.
I know your little pussy is so raw
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:42 am to AUbused
quote:
Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government.
That's not collusion, though...we've been told many times when Ds do it, it's called opposition research...
Posted on 7/24/17 at 8:47 am to AUbused
quote:
Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government
As would anyone else with a functioning brain. If you're running for office and someone randomly calls you and says "we have information that will win the election for you", we both know you're at least listening to what the person has to say. As would literally every single politician on the face of the earth. I'm not sure why this is some bewildering, character assassinating nuclear bomb to you people.
quote:
Thats what they THOUGHT they were there for and it clearly shows that they were willing to work with the Russians.
No, it shows that Trump Jr was willing to meet with someone who said that they had damaging information on Hillary Clinton. And that's it. She could've been from Papua New Guinea for all he cared, it wasn't a "Russian issue" like you're trying to make it out to be. There wasn't a vast right wing conspiracy to hack the entire United States presidential election just because Trump Jr agreed to a meeting with someone who happened to be Russian months earlier. This is called the "where there's smoke, there's fire" fallacy and the MSM is expert at taking advantage of dumbasses who are susceptible to it.
One candidate literally used a large number of American "news organizations" who donated to her campaign and openly supported her and gave her debate questions in an attempt to force her way into the presidency and no one has said a word. Obama gets caught on a hot mic saying that "we'll talk to Vladimir in private where I'll have more flexibility" and no reporting or speculation on that whatsoever. Trump Jr takes a meeting with someone claiming to have damaging info on Hillary Clinton and "MUH RUSSIAN ELECTION HACKING MUST BE TRUE". Leftism is a mental illness
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:13 am to AUbused
quote:
Second, here is your weekly reminder that the presidents son admitted outright to taking a meeting with two other top campaign advisors which was EXPLICITLY based upon receiving campaign altering information from a direct agent of the Russian government.
And this is somehow...what...criminal? Immoral? Impractical? Or rather...perfectly justifiable as becoming a future Agent of our Nation hoping to MAGA.
Trump Jr. stated that His knowledge of the whole ugly and "unreported" aspect of the overtly corrupt Hillary/Uranium One scandal, is EXACTLY WHY he took the meeting from who he believed could offer real and credible EVIDENCE of Russian manipulation of Hillary Clinton. Who could better do so than a real (supposed) Russian Insider/Agent...the WAPO? And I suppose that you believe he should have passed up this chance? If he did, I'd expect Trump to fire his Son, instead of employ Him!
Jesus Christ? Black is white...up is down!
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:29 am to bamarep
It really is impossible to underestimate your lack of knowledge of basic fact.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 9:34 am to LSUgrad08112
quote:
I'm not sure why this is some bewildering, character assassinating nuclear bomb to you people.
After months of the Trump admin and Trumpsuckers, such as yourself, claiming that there was not a shred of truth to "Muh Russians"........ that you claim the Trump Jr. meeting is inconsequential is laughable.
Its ok though, because short of being straight up mongoloid retarded, noone can make the intellectual contortions that you guys do and not know they are lying to themselves. You know it. I know it. We all know it.
Theres nothing more that needs to be said. We'll just await the findings of special council.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:05 am to AUbused
quote:
After months of the Trump admin and Trumpsuckers, such as yourself, claiming that there was not a shred of truth to "Muh Russians"........ that you claim the Trump Jr. meeting is inconsequential is laughable.
First of all, I'm claiming that there's not a shed of truth to "muh Russians hacked the election and that's why Trump is in office". I've already explained in an earlier post what the media means by "muh Russians". I'm sorry that you're too stupid to realize that two completely separate events (Trump supposedly using Russians to hack the election and Jr meeting with a Russian lady for political dirt) don't have any bearing on each other. Trump can throw a party for every single Russian politician in the Kremlin and say that they're the greatest people on earth, it still doesn't change the fact that there has never been any "collusion with the Russians to hack the election". It never happened. Get over it.
quote:
its ok though, because short of being straight up mongoloid retarded, noone can make the intellectual contortions that you guys do and not know they are lying to themselves. You know it. I know it. We all know it
how funny coming from someone like you. I know that you DESPERATELY want to make the connection between Trump and Russia "hacking muh election", but again, you're too stupid/biased/blind/whatever to see that there's nothing there.
What's your assertion about Trump exactly? That he's made completely legal, run of the mill political contact with Putin as every other president has done with other political figures from major countries and that his son took a meeting with some Russian DNC plant who claimed to have damaging info on Hillary Clinton? Sure. It happened. Who gives a shite? I don't see a problem with any other politicians doing it, so I'm not going to start caring now that Trump has. Which is exactly why I think you're a moron and a hypocrite
Or is your assertion that he won the election because he "colluded with Russia"? Because that's fricking ridiculous and, again, has been proven false in many, many different ways.
It's hilarious that you'll call me retarded when you and your ilk have been obsessing over something that was proven by the project veritas leaks to be complete bullshite but you're still repeating "Trump talked to Putin once! GOTCHA!" over and over and over. Do a little research so you don't sound completely clueless next time, friend.
quote:
Theres nothing more that needs to be said. We'll just await the findings of special council
Spoiler: they won't find anything incriminating so they'll just make a bunch of loose connections between some random Trump associate and some random Russian meeting/speaking/whatever through completely legitimate, legal, and ethical means, but they'll phrase it in a way that sounds scary so dumbfricks like you will keep yelling "muh Russian hacks" and deflecting from real issues.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:40 am to AUbused
quote:
Its going to be a long few YEARS
AUshortbused fify
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:43 am to LSUgrad08112
quote:
Spoiler: they won't find anything incriminating so they'll just make a bunch of loose connections between some random Trump associate
By random Trump associate you mean son, son-in-law, and campaign manager.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 10:47 am to BamaFan365
quote:
There is proof of collusion. It's just not being reported by the msm.
Do you really think that the MSM is going to admit they colluded with the DNC/Hillary campaign to influence the election? Because that's the only collusion that happened.
MAGA
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:22 am to AUbused
quote:
Theres nothing more that needs to be said. We'll just await the findings of special council
If the dems knew what was good for them they'd shut the frick up but they won't and can't and it's going to cost them. Indictments are coming. I'd say Rice is a goner for sure. Lynch is cooperating in an attempt to save herself. The rest of the gang is toast.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 11:59 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I have no idea if there was or wasn't collusion, but pretending there's NO WAY it happened is just as myopic as liberals who are 100% convinced it did happen.
So, there's no proof, but you still want to examine the possibilities of it happening based on that absence of proof?
Can we also investigate a link between Maxine Waters and the Roswell landing? I mean, i have no idea if Waters is a space alien or not, but it would be myopic to th be 100% convinced she isn't a space alien.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News