- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We see the results of our revolving door of “justice” every day. Meanwhile…
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:41 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:41 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Of course, there's basically no due process over there now. Human rights groups know that some innocent people are being imprisoned, but no one in or outside of El Salvador has any recourse.
Laken Riley has no recourse either. No due process. Is it either this or that? Being too soft or too hard on crime? Maybe.
2
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:42 pm to High C
quote:
No, just because data from a different country was used doesn’t make it a nonsensical, anti-American argument.
How was that data achieved?
And you referenced this, specifically in OP (see the bold)
quote:
. They claim that locking them up or executing them just won’t work. El Salvador begs to differ:
quote:
Please point out any suggestion on my part that burden of proof is the only right defendants have, friend.
I responded to your point. I'm not going to highlight your failure again.
quote:
Irrelevant to what I said.
Pointing out you made a bad point isn't "irrelevant" quote:
Is overly lenient sentencing over and over part of our right (sic), friend?
In some instances. Penalties have to be proportionate to the crime. You're not going to get some huge mandatory sentence for petty thefts or other small crimes. That disproportionality would be illegal.
quote:
Completely subjective and has been used consistently in enabling the leniency that I mentioned.
Then amend the Constitution, America-hater.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:43 pm to lsusteve1
quote:
No shock you can’t “read the room”
I'm educating a very ignorant room.
quote:
Ever wonder why your comments get downvoted continuously?
People who think comments like the retarded one you made are smart are the ones doing the downvoting.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:43 pm to MemphisGuy
Execution generally leads to 0% recidivism.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:43 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You don’t even know the question you called retarded? That actually tracks.
You consistently misunderstand/avoid good questions and points being made. Because is this, a Question like that must be asked for the purpose of clarity. To prove you understand exactly what is being discussed, and of course you failed. Again.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:47 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Multiple Prior convictions tells us who the real problems are.
That's irrelevant to the BOP of any individual crime.
And, just so you know, in almost every state, "other crimes evidence" can even be used at trial (as fricked up as that is).
The system is slanted against the defendant these days.
quote:
This is the system you defend.
I defend this system to protect innocent people accused of crimes. You pretend that can't happen for some reason.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:47 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Seeing the same slow nonsense l
"Nonsense" that hasn't been refuted will be repeated, yes.
quote:
but there is nothing hysterical about it.
If you can't recognize the hysterics in his strawman, your white flag is the size of a football field.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:49 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Laken Riley has no recourse either. No due process. Is it either this or that? Being too soft or too hard on crime? M
Oh now you're conflating NPC talking points. A double debasement, if you will.
Her killer is used for the NPC argument on illegal aliens, not the one about violent offenders being released. Get it right.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 3:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I responded to your point. I'm not going to highlight your failure again.
quote:
I'm educating a very ignorant room.
quote:
People who think comments like the retarded one you made are smart are the ones doing the downvoting.
You will receive the just deserts of your arrogance one day. Your type always does. It won’t happen on a message board, though. I’m done with you here. Are you capable of true introspection? I have no problem admitting when I’m wrong. That seems impossible for you.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Oh now you're conflating NPC talking points. A double debasement, if you will.
Calm your emotions.
She was killed by a person enabled by liberal soft on crime policies. You support such policies because muh constitution.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then amend the Constitution, America-hater.
Thats impossible. Try to be realistic.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The system is slanted against the defendant these days.
Is this why liberal activist judges and DA's are so soft on crime?
quote:
I defend this system to protect innocent people accused of crimes. You pretend that can't happen for some reason.
This soft-on-crime system run by liberals enables criminals to do bad things to innocents.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:16 pm to High C
quote:
You will receive the just deserts of your arrogance one day. Your type always does. I
Good grades, breezing through stuff that others find hard, professional success?
quote:
I’m done with you here.
I knew the white flag was coming.
quote:
Are you capable of true introspection? I
Yes. That isn't needed for this relatively simple conversation, though.
Relying on reality is enough.
quote:
I have no problem admitting when I’m wrong. That seems impossible for you.
I admitted I was wrong 2 days ago on here.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:17 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Calm your emotions.
What emotions?
quote:
She was killed by a person enabled by liberal soft on crime policies.
What was his violent criminal past prior to his terrible act of murdering her?
quote:
You support such policies because muh constitution.
I am not a supporter of illegal immigration, if that's the strawman you're building.
This has nothing to do with our Constitutional rights in the criminal justice system.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:18 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Thats impossible.
People who understand America understand the Founders made it hard on purpose. It's supposed to be hard.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I knew the white flag was coming.
Au contraire, simply an understanding that you’re incorrigible. Good luck with your continued infallibility.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People who understand America understand the Founders made it hard on purpose. It's supposed to be hard.
Impossible =/= hard. It’s not supposed to be impossible.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What emotions?
Exactly. It’s dumb when you post that. It’s dumb when I post it.
quote:
am not a supporter of illegal immigration, if that's the strawman you're building.
I didn’t say you supported that. I said you support liberal soft on crime policies that can make any innocent a victim. It’s Every criminals right to frick with others.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:37 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It’s not supposed to be impossible.
This is just you being histrionic.
It's not impossible
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:39 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It’s dumb when you post that. It’s dumb when I post it.
It's only dumb when you make an argument that doesn't make sense. When I label an emotional argument emotional, it's not dome. When you label a non-emotional argument as emotional, it's dumb.
Hopefully this lesson taught you something.
quote:
didn’t say you supported that. I
Well you use an example where the only real criminality was illegal immigration. You're not exactly making sense because, as I pointed out, you're conflating NPC talking points.
quote:
I said you support liberal soft on crime policies that can make any innocent a victim
Your example doesn't support this argument.
quote:
It’s Every criminals right to frick with others.
No, it's not. That's exactly why we have a criminal justice system.
Also, I know this may blow your mind, but crimes are not committed against people. They're committed against the government that has jurisdiction. That's why when you read a case caption for a criminal matter, it's some version of government versus the defendant. Like, the people of New York versus defendant or here, the state of Louisiana versus defendant.
This may be too difficult for you to understand though
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 4:40 pm
Page 11 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News