- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We Build Levees
Posted on 1/10/25 at 7:50 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 1/10/25 at 7:50 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Good on you for looking into the reasons why they don't. Yeah, I read some of those articles when this debate got started too.
I can't find it either. So there's that. I'm siding for you that it's not on the internet.
"Speaking so fondly of". Yeah, I do enjoy science. But if you wanna cop a 'tude and stir a fight, well then, let's go.
It's not honestly worth my time or much of my attention. But if you wanna, let's do it.
I can't find it either. So there's that. I'm siding for you that it's not on the internet.
"Speaking so fondly of". Yeah, I do enjoy science. But if you wanna cop a 'tude and stir a fight, well then, let's go.
It's not honestly worth my time or much of my attention. But if you wanna, let's do it.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 8:31 pm to sabanisarustedspoke
Obviously they don't need a levee. They need to invest in what they need to prevent this destruction caused by the inevitable fires they will get.
This is all such a tragedy that could have been and was predicted and therefore mitigated. Leadership matters and it seems a lot of our "leadership" focuses on feel good and down right ridiculous matters that don't matter..
This is all such a tragedy that could have been and was predicted and therefore mitigated. Leadership matters and it seems a lot of our "leadership" focuses on feel good and down right ridiculous matters that don't matter..
Posted on 1/10/25 at 9:07 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
greater than 80% of California’s water supply is controlled by Big Ag
Somebody takes Billy Bob's "Goliath" series a little to seriously. This "statistic" is very, very slanted!
Posted on 1/11/25 at 6:54 am to dovehunter
quote:
The “salts’” in the water are corrosive but given the situation you build a system that can handle the salt and especially if you are close to the ocean you spray this water, as is, on your house. Everybody within a new blocks of the oceans does this let’s say. Hey if it’s my $5M house that’s something I’d do.
No, you would not do it. You are saying this because you don’t understand the issues you would face. The very system you are contemplating has been installed on dozens of Gulf of Mexico (America?) platforms over the last few decades. I’ve been involved in a substantial number of these. I’ve seen how much they cost. The system would cost more than your $5 million house.
As I posted, if your house was very low lying you could have a system made of fiberglass pipe that would not cost more than your house. But you would still need a way of deploying a high volume pump that avoids it sitting in seawater when it’s not being used. If the shore was a beach you’d need a long intake pipe jutting out to where the water is clear even at low tide. You’d need to support this pipe against the tremendous forces of storm driven waves.
If the shore was a cliff (not tall because then you’d run into expensive pressure problems) you could get clarified water near shore. But you’d still have to have a way of deploying the pump into the ocean when you need it. In the meantime, you’d have an unsightly pump and lowering apparatus junking up your expensive property.
Then you’d need to get electricity to this pump. That means a dedicated generator with enough copper to handle the inrush current of your pump. Remember, there would be no utility power. All of this requires special marine grade products and techniques to install and maintain.
I don’t want to write a book. I’m just trying to explain to you that as an engineer, who spent his career in detail design and management of detail design, I know that the devil is in the details. Lots of ideas sound great until you do a FEED, then the price comes into focus, and ideas like this get abandoned with a quickness.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 6:58 am to dovehunter
How'd the levee do it's job in Bucktown on 8/29/2005?
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:07 am to cadillacattack
quote:
greater than 80% of California’s water supply is controlled by Big Ag … mostly the almond growers.
So that's where smoked almonds come from?
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:26 am to Penrod
quote:
The very system you are contemplating has been installed on dozens of Gulf of Mexico (America?) platforms over the last few decades.
That shite is overpriced and over regulated for what this situation needs. We have a bunch of those old pumps and mud pumps in a barn on the farm. A company man that used to hunt on our place would give us the old stuff that they had to replace every so often.
Low-lift in Welsh has been making pumps since the turn of the century and their pumps in NOLA and the gulf coast have stood the test of time in salt environments. Way cheaper than what you are describing.
Typical engineer. Yall always over complicate things. One rocked, dredged inlet could handle a massive lift and service damn near all of Malibu. Each house would need its own small pump for pressure, but it wouldn’t take much.
https://lolift.com/

This post was edited on 1/11/25 at 7:37 am
Posted on 1/11/25 at 5:03 pm to loogaroo
Given the location of the properties to the OCEAN and the predictability of the FIRES and the VALUE of what has been lost I'm guessing a group of common sense folks could get together and design a system that would have saved a lot of these houses, schools, and businesses..
I can't imagine a fresh water system ever having the volume of water available to solve this problem. I think this problem will require multiple solutions one of which includes the use of the OCEAN.
I can't imagine a fresh water system ever having the volume of water available to solve this problem. I think this problem will require multiple solutions one of which includes the use of the OCEAN.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 5:10 pm to dovehunter
Take your low pressure plan and Install a low pressure salt water header and each home or group of homes has its own booster pump. Not every home would require an intake as the homes are physically close together. This isn't off shore Gulf of Mexico geography. This will require a thinking outside a box mentality. Big picture solution for a big picture problem.
If something like this isn't developed these areas will never be rebuilt as insurance is going to cost prohibitive.
If something like this isn't developed these areas will never be rebuilt as insurance is going to cost prohibitive.
This post was edited on 1/11/25 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 1/11/25 at 5:12 pm to Nosevens
quote:
While the Ag industry uses plenty of water as the definitely need it for production purposes there is plenty of water that runs freely into the ocean because of environmentalists. The farmers have been fighting for more water for decades and Pelosi and Newsome have been part of the problem against it. California is inherently an arid place, which is why it has been a destination for 150 years and is beautiful but Los Angeles in particular could have been building tanks, lakes for holding water, desalination plants or lining underground piping for use of ocean salt water for the sole purpose of fighting fires. The Santa Anna winds are well known and so are the fires so there is absolutely nothing they can say but that they failed miserably
It would take 20 years to get all the permits done. To build a swimming pool in LA county takes up to 2 years. The pool has to have 2 layer almost like a boat hull in case there is a leak. It’s fricking crazy.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 5:23 pm to lsufan1971
Ill thought out regulations and poorly trained regulators with a lack of common sense is one of our country's biggest obstacles to progress.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 6:06 pm to dovehunter
quote:
Take your low pressure plan and Install a low pressure salt water header and each home or group of homes has its own booster pump. Not every home would require an intake as the homes are physically close together.
That's what I was talking about. It's simple and easy to build.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 6:11 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Umm they can. It's called annual debris and underbrush cleanup. They just refuse to remove the fuel that causes wildfires on an annual basis. So they get wildfires. Imagine that.
I mean... if they want to live in the middle of the forest, then they really outta keep the underforest clean, because it's gonna get cleaned up one way or the other. They can clean it up... or nature will clean it up... as we are seeing it do right now. Right?
Posted on 1/11/25 at 6:16 pm to loogaroo
I'm sure there were naysayers in LA before the 1927 flood. When the real flood came people realized hey we can't live like this and some common sense people decided to build some levees.. 100 years ago people found a solution to an inevitable problem.
Some engineer probably told them it would be cost prohibitive.
Some engineer probably told them it would be cost prohibitive.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 6:26 pm to dovehunter
quote:
Some engineer probably told them it would be cost prohibitive.
Yup
The intercoastal waterway would have been 30 miles instead of 3,000.
Back to top

0








