- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wa State AG Warns Journalists Investigating Somali Daycares is Potential Hate Crime Charge
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:11 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:11 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
So, Shirley isn't relevant in a thread about journalists in other states specifically copy-catting his work?
Not when they're doing it so poorly they're creating a discussion if the 1A should protect them. That's the main theme of the discussion
The point is that they're not doing work close to what Shirley did (and that wasn't even anything close to sourced, traditional journalism itself)
3
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:So you believe that these people are attempting to mimic Shirley. Got it.
Naw it's in response to the various "reporting" out of Seattle by people trying to mimic Shirley and go viral like he did.
quote:And though you do agree they are attempting to mimic Shirley, any mention of Shirley is irrelevant in a thread about a state AG's response to people who are attempting to mimic Shirley. Again, we'll agree to disagree.
The point is that they're not doing work close to what Shirley did
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:31 pm to Ailsa
As a non-Somalian, there is no way I would leave my child with one. Heck, I would just start my own childcare and give my child 55 names.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:34 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
So you believe that these people are attempting to mimic Shirley. Got it.
Isn't it clear they are?
quote:
And though you do agree they are attempting to mimic Shirley, any mention of Shirley is irrelevant in a thread about a state AG's response to people who are attempting to mimic Shirley.
Nobody said "any mention" was irrelevant. Referencing their mimicking and inferior output is directly relevant to the 1A issue, as has been discussed.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 6:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not when they're doing it so poorly they're creating a discussion if the 1A should protect them. That's the main theme of the discussion discussion
Where does the 1st Amendment say poor speech is illegal and not allowed?
Posted on 1/2/26 at 7:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:As crystal, yes. Which means Shirley is relevant to the thread.
Isn't it clear they are?
quote:You said inserting Shirley into this thread was "irrational" and "wasn't relevant." Now, if you were talking about relevance to some tangent you and others had gone off on, you will have to forgive my misinterpretation because you weren't clear on. It seemed as if you had declared yourself arbiter of what is and isn't relevant in this thread, and Shirley surely is.
Nobody said "any mention" was irrelevant.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:09 pm to Timeoday
And people wonder why the national and state debts are so high Fraud and hidden fraud everywhere.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:10 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Where does the 1st Amendment say poor speech is illegal and not allowed?
Define "poor speech"
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:11 pm to FluffyBunnyFeet
quote:
You said inserting Shirley into this thread was "irrational" and "wasn't relevant."
As a subject, not a reference. That should be clear.
quote:
Now, if you were talking about relevance to some tangent you and others had gone off on,
Making Shirley a subject is just this. I was trying to avoid that tangent.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
You mentioned it and I responded to your mention. It appears I should not have done so.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:12 pm to Csmims
Exactly!
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:14 pm to Timeoday
quote:
You mentioned it
No. My use of "poor" referenced their attempt to be "press" or "journalists" that would get 1A protection. It's not a speech issue.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. My use of "poor" referenced their attempt to be "press" or "journalists" that would get 1A protection. It's not a speech issue. ion. It's not a speech issue.
If so, who in your world would is consider a great "press" member or "journalist"? I find it very hard to find one that is honest. Very hard!!
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:20 pm to Timeoday
quote:
If so, who in your world would is consider a great "press" member or "journalist"?
THAT is the central discussion of this thread
Posted on 1/2/26 at 9:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
THAT is the central discussion of this thread
I had no idea that the answer you can not or will not provide is the central discussion of this thread.
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This exonerates the WA AG none. The message is clear - don't look into this
Naw it's in response to the various "reporting" out of Seattle by people trying to mimic Shirley and go viral like he did
Posted on 1/2/26 at 10:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Elaborate?
The point is that they're not doing work close to what Shirley did
quote:
that wasn't even anything close to sourced, traditional journalism itself
Who cares?
Page 18 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News