- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Voting machines have been shut down in several Pennsylvania districts due to votes flippin
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:29 pm to YumYum Sauce
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:29 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
In swing states, we cannot program computers to count votes "correctly".
If "scan-tron" was this sloppy my college transcript could be in jeopardy.
0
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:30 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
But Northampton County Judge Abe Kassis ruled Tuesday morning that the county could continue to use the machines, McClure said. In cases where the error would pop up for the retention question, the county would flip the results during the post-election canvass. This followed a recommendation by the Pennsylvania Department of State, McClure said.
Same question from time last year: what has been done to fix the multiple obvious election integrity issues around this country.
Based on the quote above, very little.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:31 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
I must await the mainstream media reporting with requisite third party references and fact checks to better understand what to believe.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:32 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
The premise that in a coordinated election fraud scenario the QR code (which is the ONLY thing that's being counted) and the text summary are reflecting the same voter intent is tenuous at best.
Not if they did a hand recount and the vote matched the electronic vote (represented by the QR code).
That's all I need you to explain to me. You and a dozen other people in this thread keep saying I'm retarded but every single one of you cowards have avoided this question like the plague.
If the hand recount of the paper ballots matches the electronic voter tally (the "QR" code) then that's proof that the machine didn't swap a bunch of votes, correct? If not, why not?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:33 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
And if the paper didn't match the electronic tally, they would have found that during the hand recount.
And in scenarios where the GA SoS was pushing out a directive to all 159 counties during the recount that they were going to affirm the election night (week?) totals, no matter what?
Where is the transparency in that?
Besides, if all these "election deniers" (who are in reality bucking against the MSM gaslighting psyop being shoved down our throats) who signed approximately 1,000 sworn affidavits attesting to irregularities, illegal procedures and all-around frickery they witnessed at individual precincts, county election offices, etc. are making it all up whole cloth...
Why hasn't there been a single perjury charge leveled against any of them for lying under oath about what they saw?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:33 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
RedStickFox
you’re a fricking sheep 
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:34 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
You and a dozen other people in this thread keep saying I'm retarded
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:36 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
And in scenarios where the GA SoS was pushing out a directive to all 159 counties during the recount that they were going to affirm the election night (week?) totals, no matter what?
And there it is. Now that you can't come up with a way that the machines flipped votes, you have to create a conspiracy theory that all of the counties just lied and acted like they did a recount, but all of them were in on the election stealing.
You sound like a chimp with down syndrome. How do my nuts taste you loser? LOL.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:38 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
81 million
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:39 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Besides, if all these "election deniers" (who are in reality bucking against the MSM gaslighting psyop being shoved down our throats) who signed approximately 1,000 sworn affidavits attesting to irregularities, illegal procedures and all-around frickery they witnessed at individual precincts, county election offices, etc. are making it all up whole cloth...
I kicked your arse so hard on the voting machines that you had to change topics to a bunch of random affidavits. Damn, I owned you dawg. If I beat you any harder I'd have you mounted and stuffed and turned in to a trophy.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:39 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
RedStickFox
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:42 pm to RedStickFox
You're the chess-playing pigeon. Nothing more needs to be said, since clearly you're a sock puppet account of one of the usual suspects of liberal windowlickers who can't bear the thought of Joe not getting 81M legitimate votes cast by 81M eligible voters.
This post was edited on 11/7/23 at 5:43 pm
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:44 pm to Chazreinhold
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:45 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
clearly you're a sock puppet account
Damn. Beat you so hard that I must be a fake account lol. Love it.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:47 pm to RedStickFox
Whatever you say, cupcake.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:00 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
RedStickFox
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:14 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
If you have a ruler that only measures 10 inches to a foot and you remeasure something, it's still going to be wrong, even though the results are "accurate".
Let me help you.
Yes, if you measure with the faulty ruler twice, you will get the wrong answer twice.
But lets say you get another ruler and it confirms the original measurement?
Thats what happenned when they did the hand recount. They compared the electronic "ruler" to the hand count "ruler.
And now you want to claim that both of the rulers are off.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:16 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
I voted on a paper ballot today, was so retro.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:20 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
Voters got to turn in their paper ballots after they got to inspect it. If the machine was flipping votes then the voters would have noticed.
But would they? I would suggest that over half of the voters don't even read the paper ballot before running it through the scanner.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:32 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
Not sure why anyone would think this proves the 2020 election was stolen. These machines spit out paper ballots. They are reviewed by the voter and turned in. Voters noticed the problem, and it will be fixed. This is the exact reason that Trumpists were told that votes can't be flipped. Voters got to turn in their paper ballots after they got to inspect it. If the machine was flipping votes then the voters would have noticed.
Ummm… pardon me. I have a question.
Why are democrats so enraged about voter ID, proving who you are who you say you are, and other checks while saying it’s hurting voting rights…
Buuuuuuuuuuuuut there is never any concern with machines switching votes and ballot security issues in every single election somewhere??
A coherent, logical answer if you will.
Edit.. Of course he flees.
This post was edited on 11/7/23 at 10:38 pm
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News