- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vivek supports 59% as a minimum inheritance tax. Rich people "owe" everyone else.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:06 am to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:06 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
So people who know how the world works want to tax the poor?
Why do you think the only alternative to "tax the rich" is to tax the poor?
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:14 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Why do you think the only alternative to "tax the rich" is to tax the poor?
It's not an alternative.
That's my point.
May as well tax the rich as that's where the money is.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:16 am to AggieHank86
quote:Smartest man in the room has cleared it all up for us. Not a big deal since no one here hits that $12.6 million threshold.
I thought inheritance tax is a state tax
wow
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:26 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
It's not an alternative.
That's my point.
It doesn't seem like you have a point, at least not one that's relevant to what I said.
quote:
May as well tax the rich as that's where the money is.
What does that look like?
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:29 am to NCIS_76
quote:
Jealous much?
I’m not jealous. I’m tired of living in a world dominated by the failsons of great men. Literally everything is crumbling everywhere and outside of maybe tech, all the leaders in both politics and business, and all the popular actors and musicians are just just people with rich connected parents. If they were doing a good job, I’d say let em keep it. Let’s have an aristocracy, but as it is, frick em
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:36 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
May as well tax the rich as that's where the money is.
How many poor people have ever given you a job? Or provided the capital that provided you a job? Liberals are such dumbasses and their own worst enemy
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:42 am to DisplacedBuckeye
But that itself is a perfect reflection of my point…. I know that understanding a person’s tone on an anonymous message board is a legitimately difficult thing to do, so if we’re talking past each other, I understand where that comes from. But the simple truth is that I have not taken a single thing said in this thread personally. And you assuming that I am is now a second instance of you being fundamentally wrong about where I’m coming from.
And the reason I am trying to clarify those misconceptions is not because I’m taking things personally, but because if we can get past those misconceptions, we might be able to actually discuss the core topic of the thread. Which is a topic that I personally find interesting, so I’d very much like to discuss it.
If you don’t feel the same way, that’s fine, you can move on to another thread. But if you want to talk about this topic in this thread, and if you’re going to dismiss competing perspectives based on inaccurate estimations of who you think you are talking to, then I’m going to try and elucidate those inaccurate estimations so that we can get back to considering the validity of the arguments themselves.
With all of that said, I do realize that is certainly weird within the context of how most people use social media, so I won’t disagree with that characterization haha. But I also believe it’s a healthier way to communicate than what y’all tend to default to around, so I think it’s good weird haha.
And the reason I am trying to clarify those misconceptions is not because I’m taking things personally, but because if we can get past those misconceptions, we might be able to actually discuss the core topic of the thread. Which is a topic that I personally find interesting, so I’d very much like to discuss it.
If you don’t feel the same way, that’s fine, you can move on to another thread. But if you want to talk about this topic in this thread, and if you’re going to dismiss competing perspectives based on inaccurate estimations of who you think you are talking to, then I’m going to try and elucidate those inaccurate estimations so that we can get back to considering the validity of the arguments themselves.
With all of that said, I do realize that is certainly weird within the context of how most people use social media, so I won’t disagree with that characterization haha. But I also believe it’s a healthier way to communicate than what y’all tend to default to around, so I think it’s good weird haha.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:43 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
What does that look like?
A progressive income tax structure and an inheritance tax with a moderate exemption.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:48 am to FriedEggBowL
quote:
How many poor people have ever given you a job? Or provided the capital that provided you a job?
So you think that because poor people don't have capital or jobs, we should try to get more taxes out of them?
I don't.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 11:57 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
So you think that because poor people don't have capital or jobs, we should try to get more taxes out of them? I don't.
Here's a novel idea. Instead of trying to extract more tax dollars out of anyone, they figure out how to use what they're already getting more efficiently. Liberals think it's a zero sum game. It's not. You want to punish someone for being productive and successful and providing jobs to people with their company by taking it all away when they die. Do you not realize that "taking it all away" puts POOR people out of work, when that company simply goes under for lack of capital to survive? Because they had to give most of it to the government. Who didn't do a damn thing to earn it.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:01 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
You are being bamboozled by Vivek.
I am?
He's entertaining to watch but I would never trust him or vote for him. He's a finely polished tool of the establishment with a past that deeply connects him to Soros and WEF/NWO players.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:09 pm to funnystuff
quote:
I have not taken a single thing said in this thread personally.
If that's true, you should stop acting like you took it personally.

quote:
you can move on to another thread
Pass.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:10 pm to FriedEggBowL
quote:
How many poor people have ever given you a job?
Not all employers are rich
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:10 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
A progressive income tax structure and an inheritance tax with a moderate exemption.
OK, and why do you think individual success is a good reason to tax someone at a disproportionate rate?
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:12 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
with a past that deeply connects him to Soros and WEF/NWO players
quote:
Republican presidential candidate and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy has settled his lawsuit against the "globalist" World Economic Forum (WEF) for "creating a false perception" he was affiliated with the organization, and has promised to donate the settlement money to a conservative nonprofit.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:13 pm to FriedEggBowL
quote:Some people certainly feel this way, and the poster you are responding to might be one of them.
You want to punish someone for being productive and successful and providing jobs to people with their company by taking it all away when they die.
But just to clarify, that is not what the proposal presented here is advocating for. The proposal is to maintain a very high threshold before any taxes at all are paid, after which point, approximately half of the rest goes to collective society rather than to just a handful of super lucky heirs and heiresses.
There’s a potentially valid moral argument you can make that those heirs and heiresses have a right to 100% of that money. But that is a different argument than the “the government just wants to take it all away” one that you’re going with here. That’s not what this proposal advocates.
This post was edited on 8/26/23 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:15 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I guess we just live in different worlds… in mine, communicating your disagreement with someone can happen without taking things personally. If you operate differently, then fine, we’ll leave things there.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:17 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
"Why do you rob banks, Willie?"
"'Cause that's where the money is."
Most of the money in a bank doesn't belong to the people that get hit with estate taxes.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:17 pm to funnystuff
quote:
communicating your disagreement with someone can happen without taking things personally
Look, bud, you focused on the "young and dumb" comment, not me. I'm letting you know that you should probably take a look at that.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:37 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Yea, that’s not an accurate description of what happened here.
You made what seemed to be a one-off “young and dumb” comment. I responded with what I intended to be a one-off “young and dumb” reply.
You were the one who then decided to dig in your heels and explicitly argue that my lack of experience was the core issue with the positions I was taking. When it became clear that this was your sincerely held belief, I tried to help you correct that delusion.
But I’ll leave it. I’m just letting you know that you should probably spend a little time looking inward as well
You made what seemed to be a one-off “young and dumb” comment. I responded with what I intended to be a one-off “young and dumb” reply.
You were the one who then decided to dig in your heels and explicitly argue that my lack of experience was the core issue with the positions I was taking. When it became clear that this was your sincerely held belief, I tried to help you correct that delusion.
But I’ll leave it. I’m just letting you know that you should probably spend a little time looking inward as well
Popular
Back to top
