Started By
Message

re: Very strict gun laws in Chicago yet gun crime is off the charts. More guns NOW!!

Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23264 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:21 pm to
Of course not. Heck, the country with the most aircraft has the most aircraft related death/injury rate, same with car, motorcycles, etc.

Gun or weapons are to keep tyrants at bay. You can also use them for putting food on the table, removing varmints and pests, target practice, and shooting contests. Fundraisers known as "turkey shoots" are known for their extraordinary ability to raise money for worth while projects. Gun manuafacturers and dealers employ millions of people.

But PASSION must controlled.

Passionate Latins
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:37 pm to
If you could take generationally marxist democrat controlled cities out of that data set, we would be among the very safest countries on earth.
Posted by Jimmy Russel
Member since Nov 2021
866 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

One of the other obvious main problems - drugs and drug policy. The war on drugs has failed us and no matter how many times we double down on it we don't seem to learn our lesson. Decriminalization of drugs with an emphasis on rehabilitation as opposed to enforcement would probably pay dividends in a relatively short time frame.


You mean like this?

What Happened When Oregon Decriminalized Hard Drugs - The Atlantic

That ain't National Review, son.

Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

The data are always just the data


The data are rarely the data.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82441 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:58 pm to

What is your ideal policy towards these tools that we call firearms?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The data are rarely the data.


You've never done legitimate data collection.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

What kind of question is that?
A valid one.
quote:

Give me your question in English, and I can at least attempt to answer it.
Read the OP, read what I quoted, then read my response.

It's extremely clear, after you do the abovei'd be happy to walk you through it if you can't grasp those simple concepts.

quote:

Does the number of crimes thwarted by people carrying guns work into the equation somewhere?
No. I didn't state the original assertion, the OP did, so according to his assertion no it does not.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Don't know the answer to this, but what I do know is that every country with strict gun laws is not a tyranny, but every tyranny has had strict gun control laws. You either believe in the right to protect yourself and your family or you believe the government should do it for you. If you are the latter, don't be surprised if the government starts protecting you from a lot of other things as well.

This is certainly fair.

I was just responding to the OP's specific point about the safest places with the least gun crimes are places with the most guns. If that is true, then the US would have less gun crime per capita than all those other countries who have way less guns per capita than the US, per the OP's logic.
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 3:19 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Of course not.
So then your statement below in the OP is not true, you're conceding it's not true if you answer "of course not" to that question.

quote:

It should make sense to anyone if you want less guns involved in crime, make sure anyone not in prison or jail or adjudged absolutely crazy, is able to carry a gun if they wish.



It can't be both, it can only be 1 or the other.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

A valid one.


What is valid about it? Is it valid to ask if the same number of people fall out of trees on Georgia, versus those who live in the Sahara desert?

I’m not sure I’m interpreting the question correctly, but that seems to be the gist of it.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

What is valid about it?
Same as the previous post, Read the OP, read what I quoted, then read my response. .
quote:

Is it valid to ask if the same number of people fall out of trees on Georgia, versus those who live in the Sahara desert?
You're asking me that but shouldn't you be asking the OP? I didn't make the assertion in question
quote:

I’m not sure I’m interpreting the question correctly, but that seems to be the gist of it.

The OP said the places with the least gun violence are the places with the most guns. So by that logic, if the US has more guns than other places, the US should have less gun deaths than those countries.

Again, I didn't create the statement/logic, I just responded to it.
This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 4:15 pm
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

The OP said the places with the least gun violence are the places with the most guns. So by that logic, if the US has more guns than other places, the US should have less gun deaths than those countries.


Well, if you insist on comparing apples to cowboy boots, enjoy the results, I guess.

At best, it’s a simplistic and myopic take on the issue, seemingly fueld by the notion that making the people defenseless, makes the predators harmless. The only way it isn’t a logical fallacy is if criminals obeyed the law. But they wouldn’t be criminals if they did.
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 4:39 pm to
Gun laws are for people who obey the law.
Criminals don’t care.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
23264 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

It can't be both, it can only be 1 or the other.


Are you really that ignorant? If you want less carpenters shot on job sites, remove nail guns. I get your naive mindset.

More guns less crime is a proven fact. One can simply look at the metro areas with the most restrictive gun laws vs. metro areas with less restrictive gun laws gun crime rates to settle that obvious argument.

The graph you saw in my previous response to you should have removed any doubt whatsoever.




If GUNS are so bad, why use virus and vaccines?

This post was edited on 8/23/23 at 5:11 pm
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38426 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 5:21 pm to
Gun restrictions only effect people that weren't going commit gun crime. The gun criminals are going to find their guns.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Well, if you insist on comparing apples to cowboy boots, enjoy the results, I guess.
3rd time, you're attributing the OP logic to my logic. I'm using the OP logic to make the point, you seem to be missing that.
quote:

At best, it’s a simplistic and myopic take on the issue, seemingly fueld by the notion that making the people defenseless, makes the predators harmless. The only way it isn’t a logical fallacy is if criminals obeyed the law. But they wouldn’t be criminals if they did.
Is that aimed at the OP?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 8/23/23 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

3rd time, you're attributing the OP logic to my logic. I'm using the OP logic to make the point, you seem to be missing that.


Wrong, Scooter. Op’s logic is comparing Americans and Americans. Your logic is comparing Americans and other people who don’t enjoy our liberty, freedom, and rights.

quote:

Is that aimed at the OP?


Was it addressed to the OP?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112918 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Was it addressed to the OP?

Nope, that's where the error on your part was.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram