- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vermont House passes a staggering abortion bill
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:06 am to Mike da Tigah
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:06 am to Mike da Tigah
So, if no embryo or fertilized egg or whatever you want to call it has separate existence or recognition, I guess Vermont will no longer be charging people with murder if they intentionally inflict injury upon a mother with the intent to abort the pregnancy?
Sounds like you might have some would-be fathers out there who would rather a 1-3 year sentence for battery than 18 of child support.
Sounds like you might have some would-be fathers out there who would rather a 1-3 year sentence for battery than 18 of child support.
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 8:08 am
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:06 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
quote:
Such a long way to say woman.
Such an odd thing to take from this.
Not in light of all the don't gender me talk.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:10 am to Mike da Tigah
What you posters fail to see is that this is the long con for democrats.
Single, female black mothers are not going to give up their child for abortion at any rate more than what they already are. They know that pumping out babies is their meal ticket.
This is designed to lower the population of whites, and you are all looking in another direction. Birth rates for blacks and whites are going in opposite directions.
Single, female black mothers are not going to give up their child for abortion at any rate more than what they already are. They know that pumping out babies is their meal ticket.
This is designed to lower the population of whites, and you are all looking in another direction. Birth rates for blacks and whites are going in opposite directions.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:11 am to themunch
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:18 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
You're pretty useless.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:22 am to Mike da Tigah
Why have these extreme new abortion laws not made it to the USSC to be overturned?
Why is our country and the USSC allowing this to happen??
WTF!
Why is our country and the USSC allowing this to happen??
WTF!
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:27 am to VermilionTiger
quote:
This is designed to lower the population of whites, and you are all looking in another direction. Birth rates for blacks and whites are going in opposite directions.
Not really. Just wanted to dispute this one. This isn't the reason. The left is pushing frickING HARD for any "minority" rights right now. Women aren't really a minority, but I guess they have been oppressed by the white man.
Liberals have fricking gone crazy. These people need to get fricked up bad.

This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 8:28 am
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:28 am to Vecchio Cane
quote:
so,kinda like your schtick?
No. Not at all like that.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:29 am to Mike da Tigah
As an opponent of innocent baby killing at all stages from conception to natural death of old age, I applaud Vermont.
The South was winning the legality of slavery through the Compromise of 1850. But it just had to keep pushing their victories from the Constitution (1787) until Dred Scott (1858) turned them to ashes in their mouths.
The baby killers have not learned the lesson. Because of Nuclear Option started by Harry Boy, 50 GOP Senators and a GOP President can put real conservatives on the Court. Further, a true assurance of a nominee that they will follow precedent doesn’t assure Roe. Brown overturning Plessy IS PRECEDENT!
The South was winning the legality of slavery through the Compromise of 1850. But it just had to keep pushing their victories from the Constitution (1787) until Dred Scott (1858) turned them to ashes in their mouths.
The baby killers have not learned the lesson. Because of Nuclear Option started by Harry Boy, 50 GOP Senators and a GOP President can put real conservatives on the Court. Further, a true assurance of a nominee that they will follow precedent doesn’t assure Roe. Brown overturning Plessy IS PRECEDENT!
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:29 am to rintintin
quote:
I'm not a staunch pro-lifer, but what exactly would you call a baby 1 day before birth?
I'd call it what it is, not what it isn't because I rely on emotion to make my points.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:30 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
OK, so 30 seconds before coming out of it’s mother’s vagina it’s a blob of tissue without any rights, or any identification of a baby, but the second it’s head comes out of the vagina it’s a baby?
I'd be interested to watch you try to explain how you came to that conclusion from anything I've ever said.
Ready go.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:31 am to Havoc
quote:
Havoc
Nice melt.
Your emotions aren't compelling to me.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:31 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No one is going to take any of you seriously if you can't even be bothered to speak intelligently on a topic. I get it, it's emotional, but this doesn't help.
have a down vote for being a soulless, cockroach.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:33 am to A10Rebel
quote:
have a down vote
TYFYS.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:36 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
So, a 16 year old is too young to drink, but not too young to kill, and without even getting parental consent. Want to kill a baby the minute before you give birth, no problem, the blood thirsty frickers in Vermont will be glad to kill it.
They are quite literally sacrificing human beings to their belief in completely unfettered sexual license.
It’s not just sex, though. This is a rejection of all impositions.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:36 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I'd call it what it is, not what it isn't because
Well?
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:38 am to DisplacedBuckeye
So you think murder is ok based on real estate? Location location location
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:39 am to Adam Banks
quote:
So you think murder is ok based on real estate?
I think murder is illegal.
Problem solved.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:40 am to The Maj
quote:
Well?
If you need me to answer that, you aren't qualified to participate in this discussion.
I recommend your local community college to keep the costs down.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 8:41 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No one is going to take any of you seriously if you can't even be bothered to speak intelligently on a topic
What else would you call it? That’s factually what it is, regardless of the mental gymnastics you people do to convince yourself that it’s morally defensible.
Popular
Back to top


0








