- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:45 pm to Smeg
quote:
Eminent domain is a beautiful thing.
There you go. Don't hide it.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:45 pm to Paluka
Well,that brings my question back into play. If the fed govt controls up to 60ft from the actual border, then the govt wouldn't be seizing property from landowners.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:46 pm to TidenUP
You think every piece of this wall can be built within 60ft of the border?
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:46 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
There you go. Don't hide it.
There's nothing to hide. The country is more important than any individual.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:47 pm to loogaroo
My biggest concern with this is not just federal government taking a "right of way" of sorts, but that the government is taking substantial amounts of land in some cases where logistics may make it preferable to place the border wall somewhere OTHER than the border
For instance, in the case of the National Butterfly Center "the wall will split the center’s property 1.2 miles from the border and cut off access to nearly 70% of its land"... That doesn't bode well for private property owners along the border.
For instance, in the case of the National Butterfly Center "the wall will split the center’s property 1.2 miles from the border and cut off access to nearly 70% of its land"... That doesn't bode well for private property owners along the border.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:48 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
There you go. Don't hide it.
Dont hide the countries protection comes first?
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:48 pm to Smeg
quote:
There's nothing to hide.
Sure there is. Unless you're not pretending to be a conservative and a patriot.
If you're openly admitting to being an authoritarian, I misread you.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:49 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Dont hide the countries protection comes first?
You're drunk again.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:50 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You're drunk again.
Or still drunk
This post was edited on 2/4/19 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:51 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Lol no. But then again, he isn't asking for a wall that runs the length of the border. In areas, I'm sure they wouldn't need the entire 60 ft to construct that section of barrier/fencing/wall either.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:51 pm to AggieDub14
He may never recover from that thread.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:51 pm to Smeg
quote:
Eminent domain is a beautiful thing.
Otherwise, you'd have some belligerent cocksucker holding up progress of an interstate or border wall. The country comes first. These people are fairly compensated.
You are so very far from conservative.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:52 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Do you think the country can allow an individual to undermine it?
Saying that an individual's property rights are more important than the security of the country, would be like saying the first amendment rights of a spy who gave top secret information to a hostile government, is more important than treason laws that protect the country.
Saying that an individual's property rights are more important than the security of the country, would be like saying the first amendment rights of a spy who gave top secret information to a hostile government, is more important than treason laws that protect the country.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:52 pm to TidenUP
Nope, but there are areas that a wall can't run within 60ft of the border.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:54 pm to Smeg
quote:
Do you think the country can allow an individual to undermine it?
I think a country can and should allow the people to undermine it.
quote:
Saying that an individual's property rights are more important than the security of the country, would be like saying the first amendment rights of a spy who gave top secret information to a hostile government, is more important than treason laws that protect the country.
It's not like that at all.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:54 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
You are so very far from conservative.
You're like an atheist trying to call out a Christian for not being religious.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:54 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
So don't put the wall/barrier/fence there? 
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:55 pm to TidenUP
That sounds pointless.
Posted on 2/4/19 at 4:55 pm to AggieDub14
I can't think of a better reason for E.D. than border security. If some want to be on the southern side of the wall I hope they can work that out and build north of them whenever possible.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News