Started By
Message

re: US government taking stake in private companies.

Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:46 pm to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:46 pm to
Not a huge fan of this either, but I do see that chip manufacturing is literally everything. I can see the benefits of this from a national security standpoint because chips are just as important as weaponry at this point.

Not as okay with things like this when I can't see a national security angle.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62610 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

If that option was on the table, you would be right. Unfortunately, in the real world, the government is giving away money.
"I've abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system" -GWB

quote:

If you want the US to maintain its technological advantage, money has to be spent. It makes sense to make a profit on that money. If companies don't want to pay back the money with interest, then they shouldn't take it to begin with.
Why do you oppose the Chinese? You're essentially backing the same system they use.

quote:

Conservatives see all the problems with the country, but they refuse to do anything to fix them
Certainly, stealing Obama's policies will help!
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Why do you oppose the Chinese? You're essentially backing the same system they use.


I mean...I'm sure Intel would have just as readily sold a stake to China.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
3989 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:49 pm to
Is it a giod idea? Here's a very simple test:
Imagine if Biden did this...now give your answer.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Everyone does remember that we as taxpayers once owned.. what… half of General Motors and as much, if not close, to Chrysler?


They literally failed and we stepped in. It was a pretty terrible idea too.

Now we’re making an investment in a company that has literally been one of the worst investments of the last 25 years, but isn’t failing. It’s unprecedented.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:53 pm to
Even if I were to budge on the national security angle - which is hard to do given the AMD/NVDA 15% deal - we backed arguably the worst foundry company in the world.

The cherry on top is Trump wanting their CEO fired 3 weeks ago.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:54 pm to
Trump picking winners and losers is NOT good for the country. this is a slippery slope that were just now running down. MP first, now INTEL.

Wait til Dems get in power, then all our tax dollars will be buying companies of their choosing. Such a fricking disaster. And sure Trump will say its about national security, but we all know he is just tipping the scales to protect American companies, however this will be abused by future administrations if there is no push back or lawsuits stopping these purchases
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:55 pm to
Hell yeah let’s get some American state-owned enterprises going.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Even if I were to budge on the national security angle - which is hard to do given the AMD/NVDA 15% deal - we backed arguably the worst foundry company in the world.

The cherry on top is Trump wanting their CEO fired 3 weeks ago.


It seems like a good deal on the surface. 5.7B of the US's stake in this deal is grant funding that hasn't been paid yet. So instead of simply giving money away the US is getting something in exchange.

This will also help advance a key part of Trump's agenda, which is domestic chip development. I can see where he's coming from with this.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Trump picking winners and losers is NOT good for the country.


In this case, the US taxpayer appears to be the winner. We're gaining a stake in Intel for money that was already granted to Intel. I'm honestly not sure why Intel would agree to that, but that's what we have going on here.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:


In this case, the US taxpayer appears to be the winner.
So you were cool with the Wall Street Bail outs?? Because thats what this is. Bailing out companies struggling to compete in the marketplace.

your shortsightedness is a also weakness. This is just the beginning. Extrapolate this a decade. the US taxes the frick out of its citizens so it can invest in US companies, taking money out of taxpayers pockets and putting it into corporate owners
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 6:05 pm
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

So you were cool with the Wall Street Bail outs?? Because thats what this is. Bailing out companies struggling to compete in the marketplace.


Well no, that's not what this is. Intel was already granted this money. There is no scenario where Intel doesn't get this money.

This is so unlike what you described that it isn't even on the same planet. This is closer to clawing back whatever we can get from money already dedicated to a purpose.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

This is so unlike what you described that it isn't even on the same planet.
So you dont have a clue about what you are talking about.



quote:

This is closer to clawing back whatever we can get from money already dedicated to a purpose.
this is nationalizing a company.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93807 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Not a single person mentioned him


Mentioned who? I never mentioned anyone

That iq
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62610 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

In this case, the US taxpayer appears to be the winner.
Sure. The government made a profit on TARP and the GM/Chrylser bailouts. GWB and Obama were geniuses!
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20630 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

You should look up analogies.

Your analogy compared it to the confiscation and prohibition to own AR15s. That’s not a direct correlation to defense contractors who are developing made for government contract products that no consumer could afford.

There also isn’t a single nation that doesn’t regulate or partner with defense contractors.

Are you arguing that General Dynamics should be allowed to build Abrams tanks and export to whoever they want?

Many platforms are leveraging DARPA patents licensed to private companies to begin with so they didn’t even shoulder all the R&D costs and wouldn’t have ever had the tech without federal support.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

this is nationalizing a company.


Only in your imagination.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62774 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Sure. The government made a profit on TARP and the GM/Chrylser bailouts. GWB and Obama were geniuses!


Again, this is money that was going to Intel either way. The Biden admin awarded this money to Intel. They were going to get it anyway.

Even if the government later sells its stake at a loss, ANY money recieved would more of a gain than would have been possible without this deal.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 6:44 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
56986 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:02 pm to
I’ve voted for Trump three times you dumb motherfricker.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Only in your imagination.

Its literally whats happening, you are just too naive to know the difference.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram