Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

US cities under Dem control now have real time facial surveillance JUST like China

Posted on 5/19/19 at 9:38 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53439 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 9:38 pm
quote:

A report from Georgetown researchers on Thursday suggests Americans should also focus their concern closer to home.

The report says agencies in Chicago and Detroit have bought real-time facial recognition systems. Chicago claims it has not used its system; Detroit says it is not using its system currently. But no federal or state law would prevent use of the technology.

According to contracts obtained by the Georgetown researchers, the two cities purchased software from a South Carolina company, DataWorks Plus, that equips police with the ability to identify faces from surveillance footage in real time. A description on the company’s website says the technology, called FaceWatch Plus, “provides continuous screening and monitoring of live video streams.” DataWorks confirmed the existence of the systems, but did not elaborate further.



LINK


PRISM... Hammer...


You are owned!

Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48888 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 9:42 pm to
Detroit has been broke for decades yet they spend money on this?
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25952 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 9:43 pm to
New Orleans was the first to have this technology.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21856 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

New Orleans was the first to have this technology.


It wont work on 60% of the city though...

because they all look alike
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
19914 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 11:21 pm to
To be fair, cities under Democratic control probably need this.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

New Orleans was the first to have this technology.



Palantir, I believe it is called. A very disturbing name if you recognize the origin.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67692 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 11:26 pm to
I read where San Francisco banned it.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13308 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:45 am to
What is the big deal, if it helps catch criminals why should I care that Im on camera?

San Fran did ban it and they have one of the worst records of car break ins, in the entire country.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67692 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 6:47 am to
quote:

if it helps catch criminals why should I care that Im on camera?


it can be used for good

it can also be abused just like the FISA courts and the IRS
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20870 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 7:59 am to
To be fair, I doubt it is the liberal left creating this technology and selling it to the highest bidder.

Theres no shortage of GOPe folks that get boners for this sort of equipment.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14038 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Theres no shortage of GOPe folks that get boners for this sort of equipment.


It can be used for good...

Or to be controlled.

I wouldn't trust the people in charge of this shite (to quote Men at Work) with a potato gun.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26446 posts
Posted on 5/20/19 at 9:50 am to
quote:

New Orleans was the first to have this technology.


No they weren't...

They finally got it after Jefferson Parish used it for years... and were solving crimes with it...
This post was edited on 5/20/19 at 9:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram