re: Uranium story has been debunked countless times

quote:

---

This Uranium One story has been debunked countless times by members of the press, by independent experts.

---

I challenge Toddy, BamaAtl, NT74, anyone, to post a viable link proving this.

I remember when NT74 wasn't a shill for the progressive left.

quote:

---

Shepherd Smith debunks Uranium One Accusations.

---

I was waiting for you to try that:

Shep humiliated himself. Didn't even understand half of his own point.

quote:

---

Can someone explain to me how Russia giving the Clinton foundation $140,000,000 isn't bribery?

---

Something something Trump.

Something something her turn.

Something something elephant heads.

Shoot the messenger.

Ignore the message.

Gotcha.


<-----unsurprised

quote:

---

Can someone explain to me how Russia giving the Clinton foundation $140,000,000 isn't bribery?

---

Shepherd Smith debunks Uranium One Accusations.

quote:

---

Shoot the messenger.

Ignore the message.

Gotcha.


<-----unsurprised

---

are you too embarrassed to give us a quote from it? I have seen the attacks on Shepherd Smith since he blew up your conspiracy. Going to Breitbart is like asking Putin if he muddled in US elections.

quote:

---

where political opponents are going to be unfairly, fraudulently investigated, that rips at the fabric of the contract we have that we can trust our justice system.

---

Oh my, the irony of this coming from a Democrat.

quote:

---

Shepherd Smith debunks Uranium One Accusations.

---

No, he doesn't.

While Shep was correct that Guistra had sold out of Urasia well before it sold to U1, he strangely fails to account for the fact that U1's Chairman (Ian Telfer) donated over $2M to the Clinton Foundation as the deal was being reviewed by CFIUS (ie: while Hillary was SoS). Furthermore, he claimed that the Clinton Foundation disclosed these donations to the charity but simply forgot to reveal the individual names of the donors. This is entirely false as none of the information was disclosed until much, much later.

He also did not include that Bill Clinton was paid $500k by a U1-related bank for a speech during the time HRC was SoS.

And finally Shep's biggest failure in giving the full story is that he declared that no uranium from U1’s US mines ever left the country. While you might not take the word of Breitbart for it, how about The New York Times or The Hill?

quote:

---

Mr. Christensen, 65, noted that despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.

---

Don't feel bad about being proven wrong on this, I had to do the same thing to Cruiserhog earlier this week when he made the mistake of saying that no donations were made while Hillary was SoS.

quote:

---

So he literally posts the debunking story that I just debunked. . .

---

Roaad's idea of debunking:

quote:

---

In laying out the widely reported story, Smith mispronounced the name of the Canadian investor at the center of the scandal (calling him ‘Gweh-strah,’ then ‘Gwy-strah’ instead of the correct ‘Joo-strah’); the name of the government body that reviewed the deal (‘Si-fuhs’ instead of the correct ‘Sif-ee-us); and the name of a senior State Department official involved in the review (‘Fernando’ instead of the accurate ‘Fernandez’). 

---

This is like spell checking a post.