- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Upon further research into Durham filing
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:14 pm
It appears the actions were shady as hell but not illegal.
Once again the rhetoric from trump, fox, and the rest of the populist right media make them look like idiots.
In truth, they ARE idiots. I need better allies smh..
Once again the rhetoric from trump, fox, and the rest of the populist right media make them look like idiots.
In truth, they ARE idiots. I need better allies smh..
37
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:15 pm to holdem Tiger
OP:
This post was edited on 2/20/22 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:16 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
It appears the actions were shady as hell but not illegal.
Link?
quote:
Once again the rhetoric from trump, fox, and the rest of the populist right media make them look like idiots.
How many windows have you licked today?
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:16 pm to holdem Tiger
Bugging the oval office is legal?
TIL
TIL
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:16 pm to holdem Tiger
Anyone accessing a government network connection has to sign an access agreement which will spell out what the data can and can’t be used for and what penalties are in place for misuse of the data.
Even if GT generated the data legally, handing it over to someone not legally entitled to it is a violation of the agreement and subjects both parties to criminal and civil liability.
Even if GT generated the data legally, handing it over to someone not legally entitled to it is a violation of the agreement and subjects both parties to criminal and civil liability.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:16 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
appears the actions were shady as hell but not illegal.
Once again the rhetoric from trump, fox, and the rest of the populist right media make them look like idiots.
In truth, they ARE idiots. I need better allies smh.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:16 pm to holdem Tiger
Durham works for Fox News? Wow.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:17 pm to holdem Tiger
Which part of using the entire collective of the US govt to spy on a presidential candidate and bugging the white house is legal again?
This post was edited on 2/20/22 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:18 pm to musick
If I were Nixon, I'd be pissed
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:21 pm to holdem Tiger
Why was there not a public “hey we found the bugs in the Oval Office” statement.
All it was was a tweet.
Show the bugs like they found Oswald’s manlicher.
All it was was a tweet.
Show the bugs like they found Oswald’s manlicher.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:22 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:I look forward to your book "My Truth: Tales of Hatred From Inside The Alt-Right By A Reformed White Supremacist".
In truth, they ARE idiots. I need better allies smh..
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:26 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
Durham works for Fox News? Wow.
Um, what? Durham (the prosecutor) has filed no charges over this, nor will he.
Bugging the Oval Office? Hacking servers? None of this is alleged by Durham. You people need to expand your reading material.
Here’s a read from a conservative with no love for Hill. He doesn’t like trump either, which makes him a decent unbiased data point for you.
The Dispatch
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:26 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
Bugging the Oval Office? Hacking servers? None of this is alleged by Durham. You people need to expand your reading material.
Where do you clowns come from?
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:27 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
Upon further research
aka, upon reading DU
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:29 pm to holdem Tiger
Holdem….are you…..are you aware that the Durham filing wasn’t even MEANT to be a charging document? Jeez.
It was Durham’s explanation for why he believes there is a conflict of interest for the defense team.
Why not wait until more comes out before drawing conclusions on what Durham has found?
What he alleges is that sussman pulled a Jussie smolett on the fbi
It was Durham’s explanation for why he believes there is a conflict of interest for the defense team.
Why not wait until more comes out before drawing conclusions on what Durham has found?
What he alleges is that sussman pulled a Jussie smolett on the fbi
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:30 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
It appears the actions were shady as hell but not illegal.
Oh cool! I’m off to hack the White House! If anybody comes after me… this thread should get me off the hook right…. Right??
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:32 pm to holdem Tiger
quote:
Upon further research into Durham filing
You don't even provide rationale for your conclusion, much less what research you might've done to reach said conclusion-- not that I expect there is any research.
Subpar troll... but whatever.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:36 pm to holdem Tiger
It was worse than watergate given how many entities were in on the fabrication of the Clinton campaign
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:36 pm to Knartfocker
quote:Manipulating international communications by the US President is A-OK?
Bugging the oval office is legal?
Using US resources to falsely frame a sitting president of the USA is just fine?
Spying on a US presidents family is no concern?
Sounds like some idiot in this thread for certain.
Posted on 2/20/22 at 1:39 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
They also used the lies as a pretext to remove a sitting president. It was a coup attempt that failed
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News