Ultimately the government is just the barrel of a gun

quote:

---

I remember my first freshman-level Poli sci course too

---

doesn't make it wrong. If you defy .gov you will eventually be looking down a gun barrel. You may try and justify it as the only way to maintain order, just don't pretend it isn't true. Better yet, don't pay your property tax and see who eventually shows up at your door. You will comply or be killed just like Chairman Mao said

The governments job now is to extract tax dollars from its citizens to enrich the corporations that fund their campaigns.

This is why the 2A was included and why it’s being attacked so hard. The overreach hasn’t impacted people enough for the majority of them to say ‘stop’ in a manner where using the 2A becomes necessary.

quote:

---

you will ultimately be

---

quote:

---

he would have ultimately been

---

quote:

---

you will ultimately be

---

quote:

---

Every scenario taken all the way to the logical conclusion ends in the threat of violence

---

You have a career in politics my dude. Your hyperbole and gaslighting skills are legit.

quote:

---

“It’s not a social contract if I don’t explicitly agree to it”

---

When you have a scenario where 51% of a national electorate agrees for the government to use violence against 49%, it is not a social contract. That is slavery.

When Joe Biden gets up and runs his dumb, mumbling mouth about something like banning semiautomatic firearms. What he really means is he intends to send heavily armed men to my door, at the home where my children live to seize my personal property, and if I don't comply he will order them to shoot me. That is essentially what he is saying, whether those words actually come out, that is still the implication.

Likewise, when he threatened to force all employers with 100 or more employees to mandate the vaccine. He was implying that if the emoyer doesn't comply, he would send armed men to that business to shoot the business owner if they didn't comply.

Everything that comes out of a politicians mouth that calls for some order or some ban or something forced on us, really needs to be heard with the words "or else I will send men with guns to your door" added on at the end. Because that is what they really mean.

quote:

---

Your hyperbole and gaslighting skills are legit.

---

Might seem a little extreme or hyperbolic, but is it really? Is violence by men with guns not always at the other end of every order or demand by a politician? Otherwise, why would anyone care what they say? They would otherwise just be empty suits with Cheshire cat smiles.

quote:

---

“It’s not a social contract if I don’t explicitly agree to it”

---

Clung to by dweebs who aren't in the least, self reliant.

quote:

---

You’re angry because he’s right.

---

Most definitely not angry brother. Those that enforce the law often do carry firearms. I'm not sure I subscribe to the notion that it's an "absolute" result.