- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tyler Robinson is the shooter
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:14 pm to Tiger_Claw
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:14 pm to Tiger_Claw
quote:
Bahahaha. You're such a fricking loser. Bluster my way through facts? I was literally posting factual information (sorry it doesn't fit your narrative). You should engage in some critical thinking exercises, or did they not work with you on that at UMSL?
You should learn reading comprehension?
Since when is this dude a right wing extremist?
0
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:17 pm to roadGator
Turns out there are demographic groups that really didn’t like Charlie Kirk. And after spending the last couple of days being happy or ambivalent that he died, Claw is pivoting to pretending the person who killed the guy he hated is not a person who agrees with him. But sometimes peoples struggle with logic.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:18 pm to the808bass
You’re swinging and missing here. Nobody is “lining people up and assigning ideology by statistics.” The data comes from actual cases, indictments, and law enforcement records that go back decades and across both Republican and Democrat administrations. The NIJ didn’t pull this out of thin air, it’s case-based, peer-reviewed research like the PIRUS dataset.
The consistent trend is simple: far-right extremists have committed more ideologically motivated violence in the U.S. than any other group. That’s not a Biden talking point at all, that’s DHS, FBI, and every major independent study saying the same thing.
So yeah, I did comprehend your question. You just don’t like the answer because it wrecks your narrative. I mean, the guy is obviously someone that comes from a right-leaning family, in a right-leaning state, and also fits that right-leaning profile.
Also, were you not one of the many posters here yesterday wanting to go to war with the Left over this incident? Do you really have violence and hate in your heart bass? For a fellow True Son? So many hurtful words my man -- go find some peace.
The consistent trend is simple: far-right extremists have committed more ideologically motivated violence in the U.S. than any other group. That’s not a Biden talking point at all, that’s DHS, FBI, and every major independent study saying the same thing.
So yeah, I did comprehend your question. You just don’t like the answer because it wrecks your narrative. I mean, the guy is obviously someone that comes from a right-leaning family, in a right-leaning state, and also fits that right-leaning profile.
Also, were you not one of the many posters here yesterday wanting to go to war with the Left over this incident? Do you really have violence and hate in your heart bass? For a fellow True Son? So many hurtful words my man -- go find some peace.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:19 pm to Tiger_Claw
How far are you from the new big elementary school in Little Rock? You know the one I’m talking about.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:20 pm to Tiger_Claw
quote:
So yeah, I did comprehend your question.
If you had, you might have tried to answer it. That would have made your supposed comprehension much more believable.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:20 pm to the808bass
Hopefully more than 500 feet.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
If you had, you might have tried to answer it. That would have made your supposed comprehension much more believable.
I did answer it, I am just sorry your brain is unable to process it. I would love to be able to make you more intelligent bud, I can't help you there though. The methodology is straightforward: case-based datasets (PIRUS, BIAS, etc.) coded from indictments, court records, manifestos, and law enforcement sources. That’s how ideology is assigned, not by “statistics fairy dust.”
Do you not understand how data works?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:23 pm to the808bass
quote:
How far are you from the new big elementary school in Little Rock? You know the one I’m talking about.
Ooh! Are we talking Sonic ITT?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:25 pm to Tiger_Claw
No. I completely understand it.
I’m asking that even if I stipulate to the arguments in that report (you can look that up), what does it mean for our boy here?
Is he 80-some% right and 20% left? Do we make a count of how many right wing terror attacks occurred this year and decide based on that what the data is leaning towards? Or does that data not mean a damn thing with regards to an individual case?
I’m asking that even if I stipulate to the arguments in that report (you can look that up), what does it mean for our boy here?
Is he 80-some% right and 20% left? Do we make a count of how many right wing terror attacks occurred this year and decide based on that what the data is leaning towards? Or does that data not mean a damn thing with regards to an individual case?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:29 pm to the808bass
Of course stats don’t decide an individual case, they show the trend. And the trend is crystal clear: the vast majority of ideologically motivated violence in this country has come from the far-right. That matters for threat assessment and resource allocation, whether you like it or not. Pretending otherwise is just you building strawmen to dodge the data.
Nobody’s saying a guy is “80% right-wing, 20% left.” The point is that when law enforcement and policymakers look at decades of cases, the overwhelming weight of evidence points to the far-right. That context matters when you’re assessing risk, allocating resources, and shaping prevention strategies.
Nobody’s saying a guy is “80% right-wing, 20% left.” The point is that when law enforcement and policymakers look at decades of cases, the overwhelming weight of evidence points to the far-right. That context matters when you’re assessing risk, allocating resources, and shaping prevention strategies.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:31 pm to Tiger_Claw
quote:
Of course stats don’t decide an individual case
Perfect. We agree.
How did you interpret the writings on the bullets? Or have you not made it that far in the news cycle yet?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:31 pm to LB84
Some kids go wrong regardless of the best efforts of their parents…
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:33 pm to VOR
quote:
Some kids go wrong regardless of the best efforts of their parents…
100000%
But the kid was not a right wing extremist
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:33 pm to the808bass
How about 100% Marxist?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:34 pm to hogcard1964
Close enough.
He believed in Marxist theory whether he had made it far enough into the actual literature or not to understand what he believed.
He believed in Marxist theory whether he had made it far enough into the actual literature or not to understand what he believed.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:34 pm to VOR
quote:
Some kids go wrong regardless of the best efforts of their parents…
Hence we have progressives like you
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:35 pm to Craig86
quote:
Straight white male does it again. How does it feel to have one of your own kill Kirk
Are you seriously expecting that gas leading to work on this board? The dude calling Charlie Kirk a fascist you really believe was right wing?
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:36 pm to the808bass
The engravings and costumes aren’t proof of ideology, they’re proof of 4chan brainrot. It’s the same blend of meme cosplay, trolling, and shock value that runs through online boards. Slapping “Bella ciao” on a bullet doesn’t magically make him part of a disciplined left-wing movement any more than carving “Kekistan” would make him a foreign army.
What it actually shows is how toxic meme culture can bleed into real violence. And that fits a long, ugly pattern: angry young men marinating in extremist online spaces, then lashing out. That’s been overwhelmingly a far-right problem in the U.S., and this case doesn’t erase that reality.
Thank you for proving my point.
What it actually shows is how toxic meme culture can bleed into real violence. And that fits a long, ugly pattern: angry young men marinating in extremist online spaces, then lashing out. That’s been overwhelmingly a far-right problem in the U.S., and this case doesn’t erase that reality.
Thank you for proving my point.
This post was edited on 9/12/25 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:37 pm to Tiger_Claw
quote:
I think that tracks with the statistic that 84% of political motivated homicides are committed by right-wing extremists. At least that is what is claimed by the authors of this article from NIJ
Did you actually read the article, or just pick a stat that you thought would be a gotcha! You see, I actually read it, so if you want to “discuss” what it says, then I’m your huckleberry.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 7:37 pm to Tiger_Claw
Oh. So you’re just dishonest. Not uninformed.
Good luck trying to get the toothpaste back in the tube on this one.
You can lie to everyone else all you want. Don’t lie to yourself.
Good luck trying to get the toothpaste back in the tube on this one.
You can lie to everyone else all you want. Don’t lie to yourself.
Page 44 of 51
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News