- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two Female Christian Artists Could Be JAILED For Not Creating Art For Same-Sex Weddings
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:25 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:25 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
Why would you say that?
Because it’s true.
Sorry your uncledaddy damaged you as a child.
quote:
You're the one making the cuck thread where you beg for big leftist forest hobos to grab you like Ned Beatty and bend you over.
your stupid fricking Phoenix city ordinance. It cannot force a human being to conduct a action, to build something, etc. Can't happen. People aren't fricking slaves, dumbass.
I didn’t comment one way or the other. Everything in my OP was copied and quoted straight from the article, even the thread title.
Now calm down. I know it’s difficult for people with your limitations (product of generations of incest, severe abuse and neglect during childhood) to control their emotions and thus become overly hostile and lash out in anger. But if you’re going to try and participate in the conversation, please try to conduct yourself in a civilized manner.
2
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:26 pm to upgrayedd
quote:His logic is that they can be fined or even (perhaps) confined, but that it will probably be suspended during appeal and that they have about a 100% chance of winning that appeal and negating the ordinance.quote:So city ordinances aren't enforceable laws? I'm not following your logic.
your stupid fricking Phoenix city ordinance. It cannot force a human being to conduct a action, to build something, etc. Can't happen. People aren't fricking slaves, dumbass.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:26 pm to AggieHank86
You still got your beto sign up?
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:27 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
So city ordinances aren't enforceable laws? I'm not following your logic.
I know when they are broken here.. there is a price to pay.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:28 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Where are you getting your info from?
From my brain.
It's "a rule" (notice the quotations dude) that "mandates" that free people must perform some random act.
Think...
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:28 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
It's "an ordinance" that professes to force free human beings to conduct an action.
It's a myth. It's a figment of some leftist fricktard's imagination.
It's not an ordinance.
Have these 2 women been in court? How many times? and is it due to that "Ordinance"?
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:29 pm to Darth_Vader
frick you. You're an idiot.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:29 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Christian victims are my favorite.
Of course you delight in this...you're a dick!
quote:
Nothing like 70% being "oppressed."
You know this is non-sequitur...the laws/interpretations of the laws allow for tyranny of the minority in this PC climate.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:30 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
From my brain.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:30 pm to Adam Banks
quote:Never had one. The Cruz sign was quite adequate.
You still got your beto sign up?
But I did run over a few Beto signs with the baler. Should be fun watching the cattle chewing on them in a few weeks.
“But, but, but ... you told us not to make fun of his name ....”. Yep, that was childish and stupid. Lots of Texans have Latinized nicknames.
This post was edited on 12/26/18 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:32 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
You are making assumptions based on what you think a superior court will rule. He is talking about what is actually on the books right now. I’m sure the Colorado man never thought something seemingly simple would go to the Supreme Court
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:33 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
But if you’re going to try and participate in the conversation, please try to conduct yourself in a civilized manner.
Yet..
quote:
I know it’s difficult for people with your limitations (product of generations of incest, severe abuse and neglect during childhood) to control their emotions and thus become overly hostile and lash out in anger.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:33 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Have these 2 women been in court? How many times? and is it due to that "Ordinance"?
I have no idea.
If they actually traveled to court over this, they are stupid.
City ordinances cannot force free human beings to do shite. Some leftist whacko's can make "an ordinance" outlawing toilet paper and saying everyone must wipe their asses with their hands like Pakistani's, but it's not happening.
The cuckiness in this thread is mind boggling.
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:35 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
From my brain.
It's "a rule" (notice the quotations dude) that "mandates" that free people must perform some random act.
Think...
Will ask it again...
Then why the court cases and now going all the way to the State Supreme Court?
Even the State legislature has spoken out about the ORDINANCE" (that's per every article written on it and the video of the people involved"
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:37 pm to Kracka
quote:
Right, you'd have to know the couple coming in for a cake who were remarrying.
Bingo! And not only knowing them to know they were remarrying but you would have to know them well enough to know the circumstances behind the remarriage to determine if it were unbiblical and even then there is still no guarantee it is. A gay wedding removes any need for additional info right off the top.
Again, following the logic out one would have to say the same principle belies a Jewish baker being forced to bake a cake for a Nazi "Hoe-down" party. Or how about a Muslim baker being forced to bake a cake depicting a pig taking a dump on Allah? The slippery slope leads to very absurd situations by going down that mindless path the left wants to lead us down to push their agenda.
This post was edited on 12/26/18 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:38 pm to Adam Banks
Okay then. You, Adam Banks, by ordinance of the city of Houston, must manufacture 25 pair of sandals for goat herders in Greece.
Do it or you're going to jail.
Your call
Do it or you're going to jail.
Your call
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:41 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Will ask it again...
Then why the court cases and now going all the way to the State Supreme Court?
Even the State legislature has spoken out about the ORDINANCE" (that's per every article written on it and the video of the people involved"
then Arizona is a fricked up place, and the people being slapped around court have cowered like the OP of this stupid thread
I see you post all the time. Are you telling me you're actually now at the level of arguing circular reasoning on behalf of tyrannical govt?
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:44 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
City ordinances cannot force free human beings to do shite.
That's not true.
Owner fined for ordinance violation over upkeep issues at old Hannibal hospital.
New Haven eatery owner fined over ‘pay-for-pee’ sign
Trees Tangling Property Owners Over City Ordinance
Connecticut restaurant owner fined over no dog pee sign..
ALL of these happened this year! And they WERE fined.
quote:
Some leftist whacko's can make "an ordinance" outlawing toilet paper and saying everyone must wipe their asses with their hands like Pakistani's, but it's not happening.
Some WACKO leftist made a city ordinance that said a restaurant owner could not display a NO DOG PEE sign and he paid a price.
LINK
quote:
A sarcastic sign in the window of a Connecticut restaurant asking people not to let their dogs pee on the eatery’s outside flower pot has earned the owner a $250 fine.
Duc Nguyen, owner of Duc’s Place in New Haven, tells the New Haven Independent he was disgusted with people allowing their dogs to urinate on his pot.
He thought a humorous sign was a good way of discouraging dog walkers from letting pets relieve themselves there. It read: “Attn: dog owners. This is a pay-per-pee flower pot. (Pay inside or leave your address and we’ll kindly return the favor.)”
So yes. They are enforceable!
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:48 pm to Jjdoc
wow, you're not capable of understanding
those examples are not forcing a free person to manufacture something
You are completely incapable of understanding. You're too busy finding diversion "issues" that fan flames of stupid people
those examples are not forcing a free person to manufacture something
You are completely incapable of understanding. You're too busy finding diversion "issues" that fan flames of stupid people
Posted on 12/26/18 at 1:48 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
then Arizona is a fricked up place
The city of Phoenix is.
quote:
and the people being slapped around court have cowered like the OP of this stupid thread
A coward would not fight it and just make the art.
quote:
Are you telling me you're actually now at the level of arguing circular reasoning on behalf of tyrannical govt?
No, I'm telling you this and many other things happen throughout the USA all the time and it needs to fought. Why? Because there is a leftist army wanting you to bow to their demands like this.
Just like the restaurant own and the PEE sign. Dogs over PRIVATE property.
Page 4 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News