Started By
Message

re: Twitter just shut down new Trump ad

Posted on 7/19/20 at 7:40 am to
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14868 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 7:40 am to
Looks like YouTube disabled it as well. Link in OP isn't working.
Posted by Mrtommorrow1987
Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2008
13152 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 7:47 am to
Are you ok with left wing political bias monopolizing all of your media except talk fricking radio?
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64752 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 7:47 am to


Trump doing work.


Mostly all unreported nationally.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99196 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 7:50 am to
Great video.

We need that Trump for the next 4 months
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
77407 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

It's totally up to Twitter to decide.


Then twitter is proving they can control their content which makes them a publisher and not a platform and should lose their 230 protection...
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:01 am to
quote:

The Thread title is misleading.


Looking forward to the next thread from a libtard that you correct.

Thanks lunch lady, for keeping us on the straight and narrow.

Hope you can recover from this travesty and enjoy the balance of your weekend.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105449 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:11 am to
You have no clue what you’re talking about. You’re a retard.
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Are you ok with left wing political bias monopolizing all of your media except talk fricking radio?


It is a of awareness that constitutes their "charm".

After their spoon fed MSM talking points they are left with nothing. Well they do have projection, deflection, strawmen, and ad hominems (racist, misogynist, homophobe, islamophobe or other victim friendly label).
Posted by Mrtommorrow1987
Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2008
13152 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:18 am to
It’s insane. No one is able to state a fricking fact
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:20 am to
quote:

It’s insane. No one is able to state a fricking fact


Evidently they do have the down vote button. Further evidence that they can offer no rational rebuttal.
Posted by MsGarrison
Steele Town LOL
Member since Nov 2009
22009 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:30 am to
No substance to refute. Just more name calling proving my point.

Posted by viceman
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2016
30688 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Great video.

We need that Trump for the next 4 months


Agreed, you know I had forgotten about Trump, the philanthropist and all of the good he has done for individuals over the decades. If I needed to be reminded of this many others do too.
This post was edited on 7/19/20 at 8:34 am
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11103 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 8:39 am to
I’ve had posts shut down for the same reason. Copyrighted music.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11308 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I’ve had posts shut down for the same reason. Copyrighted music.


And I’d bet you aren’t such a large public figure that the band filed a cease and desist
Posted by MsGarrison
Steele Town LOL
Member since Nov 2009
22009 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 9:32 am to
He made a point. If they did it for John Doe they should do it for Trump. He isn’t above the rules.
He has the money to pay for their music and maybe just maybe they don’t won’t to be near Trump.
This post was edited on 7/19/20 at 9:33 am
Posted by thingshavechanged
Member since May 2017
413 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 9:43 am to

"It was a cover song wasn't actually Lincoln park signing so I don't no the exact rules to that."


An Infringement claim is asserted by the songwriter(s).
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 9:47 am to
quote:

n Infringement claim is asserted by the songwriter(s).



What's the difference between this and playing songs at bars? Songs at his rallies?
Posted by thingshavechanged
Member since May 2017
413 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 9:48 am to
"His campaign has been paying for the rights and the artists still file grievances with the MSM to pull it down. It’s such horse shite."

Totally wrong. Big difference in performance license(arenas; restaurants and bars, etc.) and sync license (synched to video)
Posted by thingshavechanged
Member since May 2017
413 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 9:52 am to
"The band isn’t sitting around answering their email to decide if someone can license their song."


The songwriter(s) publisher is. Sync licenses are a specific, negotiable transaction.
Posted by thingshavechanged
Member since May 2017
413 posts
Posted on 7/19/20 at 10:01 am to
"What's the difference between this and playing songs at bars? Songs at his rallies?"

From NoSaint comment link:

IF A CAMPAIGN WANTS TO USE A SONG IN A CAMPAIGN COMMERCIAL, WHAT PERMISSIONS DOES
IT NEED?
This kind of use may involve rights such as synchronization of music with video and the possible use of the mastersound recording. The campaign will need to contact the song’s publisher and possibly the artist’s record label to negotiate the appropriate licenses with them. And remember, campaign videos containing music that are posted on the internet also require these licenses.

Bars and rallies involve performance licenses which are typically "blanket licenses" through ASCAP, BMI or SESAC. Different animal from syncing with a video.
This post was edited on 7/19/20 at 10:04 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram