- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker warns Trump about regime change in Venezuela
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:49 pm to Tiger985
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:49 pm to Tiger985
quote:
Carlson was making $20 million a year at Fox.
His current projects aren't getting him near that. He's taking money from somewhere.
I don't care who is paying him but he should be a little more upfront about it.
Why?
With that said I asked Grok to estimate his yearly income:
quote:
Estimates of his post-Fox annual income vary widely due to the private nature of his ventures:
Some sources suggest $12–38 million.
Others around $6–20 million.
One analytics-based estimate places it at $12–15 million from digital platforms alone.
These figures are speculative and drawn from media reports, viewership data, and comparable independent creators. His total earnings appear substantial, potentially comparable to or exceeding his Fox-era income in successful years, driven by direct audience monetization rather than a single salary.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:26 pm to KCT
Any idiot that places Tucker in the same category as Candace Owens either has never listened to him or has nefarious motives. Tucker is certainly freed of the editorial control that networks have exercised over him in the past, but he isn’t batshit insane like Owens.
And that article is straight propaganda that attempts to portray dipshits like Mark Levin, Ted Cruz or Ben Shapiro as more representative of the America First agenda than Tucker. The funny part is, Trump himself solicits advice from Tucker and a wide range of other folks. Somehow he finds it useful to take in differing opinions, then come to a reasoned conclusion. Sometimes siding with Tucker’s viewpoint and other times he doesn’t. Meanwhile many MAGA voters don’t seem to be able to handle a party that isn’t in 100% lockstep. That absolutely should not be the ideal. We should have vigorous debate in both parties about what policies best represent the American people.
And that article is straight propaganda that attempts to portray dipshits like Mark Levin, Ted Cruz or Ben Shapiro as more representative of the America First agenda than Tucker. The funny part is, Trump himself solicits advice from Tucker and a wide range of other folks. Somehow he finds it useful to take in differing opinions, then come to a reasoned conclusion. Sometimes siding with Tucker’s viewpoint and other times he doesn’t. Meanwhile many MAGA voters don’t seem to be able to handle a party that isn’t in 100% lockstep. That absolutely should not be the ideal. We should have vigorous debate in both parties about what policies best represent the American people.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 1:44 pm to justaniceguy
I support regime change there as long as it doesn’t require boots on the ground and cost American lives
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:45 pm to deltaland
Well here’s the thing about that…
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:33 am to AUTiger1978
“Famously Pat always beats up on Goldman Sachs but never Morgan Stanley,” a young Carlson said on C-SPAN. “I do believe that there is a pattern with Pat Buchanan of needling the Jews. Is that antisemitic? Yeah.”
Popular
Back to top

0




