re: Tucker vs Huckabee debate has posted

You moron. The simple brained statement of one entity sending another entity money doesn’t equate to the sender “bowing down” to the receiver. Hence my request for specific detail.

quote:

---

It was just odd

---

That’s the Tuck

Tucker kicked lying arse Huckabee's arse, and you know it, and you can't stand it.



Not sure what your disconnect to reality is...

Soooo .... The Huckster has commented on the interview with The Cucked Tuckster of Qatarlson:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Tucker and I had a very twisty and frankly confusing discussion about the meaning of Zionism.

Now, I have no idea if Tucker was trying to be difficult or we were just talking past each other, but he started out the discussion on Zionism by saying he wanted to ask me in my capacity as a former Baptist minister about the "theology" of Christian Zionism.

But, he kept dragging it to discussions about other topics, literally other countries, things that have nothing to do with theology and certainly not with Israel, Zionism, or anything else.

So let me just make it really clear.

Since Tucker actually seemed more interested in the definition of political Zionism, it's simple: Zionism is the belief that Israel has a right to exist in safety and security. That's it. Pretty simple and straightforward.

Lots of Christians who don't have a theological basis for supporting Israel are actually Zionists because they support Israel's right to exist in safety and security.

The last two Popes, for example, both came here to Israel, Pope Benedict in May 2009 and Pope Francis in May 2014, and both of them said the exact same words:

"Let it be universally recognized that the State of Israel has the right to exist, and to enjoy peace and security within internationally agreed borders."

Pope John Paul II, arguably one of the most influential of anyone in the Christian faith and a remarkable man was also a "Christian Zionist."

Tucker, I couldn't get you to say you support Israel's right to exist during our interview. But as I told you then and I'll say it again, someone doesn't need to believe it's commanded by the Bible in order to be a Zionist. But if one DOES believe the Bible (and I do) then it's even more compelling.

All you need to do is believe that Israel has a right to exist.

Why can't you just say that? I asked you multiple times during our interview and not once did you give me a direct answer. You refused to say whether or not Israel has a right to exist. I hope you will state your answer to that simple question soon.

---

quote:

---

, but I am curious about the specific details as to how our government bows down to Israel

---

How close is Iran to nuclear weapons? How are they this close when we have struck their facilities, at the behest of Bibi, several times over the past 20 years? Yet Bibi's claims never change. That is fear mongering by Bibi and our government plays along.

I also suggest you read about Jonathan Jay Pollard. Why does our government allow "our greatest ally" to commit the greatest act of espionage in our nation's history with nothing even close to even a hand slap? That is bowing down.

In 2014, ISCAP did in fact finally release documents that prove Isreal stole enriched uranium from us during the NUMEC affair. This is how Isreal got its weapons. Yet, our government bowed to them and did nothing.

The USS Liberty. Our government bowed to Isreal and said the attack was a mistake. Let's not realize that no enemies of Isreal had ships of that size and type at that time, but sure...mistaken identity.

I could go on.

Just passing thru....Revelation 21:15-17

quote:

---

Just passing thru....Revelation 21:15-17

---

???

quote:

---

Mike has been exposed for a while now. He's an Israel shill.

---

I think one of the highlights was him in the segment about the Israeli spy who sold our battlefield war plans to our enemies where he went from saying he only met him at a dinner once to then admitting he ran for president advocating for the guys release on behalf of his friends (aka AIPAC/mossad) and then not having any justification as to why he should be released early.

Then he transitioned into defending Israel refusing to extradite pedos accused of crimes against American children and was even fine with us releasing them prior to trial to the Israelis knowing full well they wouldn’t prosecute.

He’s worse than a shill - he’s an Israeli asset and has zero shame in putting their interests ahead of ours. If you’re willing to shield pedos from prosecution you are not a good or Christian person.

If you’re willing to put another nation in front of your own you have no business working in the US government.

That guy is a lying traitor.

quote:

---

His responses about Jonathan Pollard were not believable and it just went downhill from there.

---

You mean the part where he rambled from one lie to the next openly contradicting himself?

Either he’s Joe Biden level senile or he’s a damn lying traitor.

quote:

---

What makes you think I do not?

---

Probably this

quote:

---

That word is well overused and has about as much teeth as racist or sexist or any other -ist word. It means nothing to me

---

I can't imagine you call out something that "means nothing" to you.

quote:

---

I would love to hear you explain anti-semitism.

---

I don't think you need it explained, I will point to two examples in this thread, the aforementioned post defending the good Christian act of "segregating Jews and/or kicking them out of their country" and the Jews murdered Jesus post. The latter example meant to elicit anger towards Jews and is a gross misunderstanding of Christianity. (Also both posts have zero to do with modern day Israel)