1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker Endorses Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed for US Senate
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:03 pm to 3down10
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:03 pm to 3down10
quote:
You can vote 3rd party, you can stay at home. There are more than 2 choices.
And if you as a “conservative” does that, it helps El-Sayed. Thank you for proving my bout abut cutting off your nose to spite your face.
quote:
Because rich people should NOT be taxed more. You just tried to use it as a justification for taxing the poor, a real piece of shite move.
While I do think EVERYONE should have skin in the game…please link me stating the poor should be taxed more.
You want to talk about a lie to cope.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:07 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I work within the system that is present. I don’t work in a fantasy world. The IRS has stolen less from citizens through my efforts. What have you done? You have any tangible results. I’m not interested in a utopia. That’s as useless as arguing for socialism…which you have come very close to doing in this thread as well.
You mean people paid you to use the loopholes.
Again, that's not fighting the IRS. As you say, you work within the system because you are part of the system.
quote:
I would gladly vote to abolish the irs. I’d be fine. Find another area to practice. Tell us specifically what you have done while you call someone actually helping people not pay the IRS the bad guy. I’ll wait patiently while you say nothing about what you have done and prove my point.
I'm not the one pretending I fight the IRS.
quote:
The wealthy didn’t make you poor man. Stop blaming others. Take responsibility for yourself.
Again, this is a fantasy you've created as a coping mechanism.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The time for all of this was during the primaries. Can you link Tucker or you bringing all of this up in the primaries? That would at least make it not appear as something you claim it isn’t.
You're welcome. I don't think there was a grand strategy.
There wasn't much of a primary in Michigan. I don't think there was an occasion to discuss how good or bad Mike Rogers was politically.
The discussion came up over an hour and a half into an interview that was almost two hours long. This wasn't a planned event. Tucker was agreeing with Sagaar (spell?) about how it was Trumpian to run on America First views of foreign aid.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:16 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
And if you as a “conservative” does that, it helps El-Sayed. Thank you for proving my bout abut cutting off your nose to spite your face.
You aren't owed anyone's vote. If you want someone's vote, do things that they support.
If your entire platform is "The stuff they want to force you to do is worse than the stuff we want to force you to do" then you have nothing to offer.
And that's not my fault no matter how much you want to pretend it is.
quote:
While I do think EVERYONE should have skin in the game…please link me stating the poor should be taxed more.
You want to talk about a lie to cope.
I'm not interested in playing the game at all. That's why I'd like to have a constitutional republic removing 95% of the federal government starting with installing an honest monetary system as outlined in the constitution and closing the general welfare clause loophole that allows people to do anything they can spin as "for the good" and so on.
I give 0 fricks for the American Empire. I hope it can be reigned in rather than waiting for it to fail. But either is acceptable.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:28 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Finally. Thank you for admitting you won’t vote for another President that gets elected in the general in your lifetime.
Decreases spending at the federal level hasn’t happened for 97 years. You want to make a difference. Baby steps. You’re acting like an infant.
I voted for Trump in 2024. He in fact did not drain the swamp.
That's fine, it happens. Politicians lie.
But voting for people I know are just going to do those things from the start and is NEVER going to happen. I will vote against every RINO neocon. They are at the bottom of the list, even below democrats.
So as I said, nominate a conservative or frick off.
quote:
What were your thoughts on doge?
I thought it was like a Monty Python sketch.
I liked that it found corruption and did what it did, but it's like trying to empty a sinking boat with a tea cup instead of plugging the holes first. It was also telling that it didn't take long before suddenly it was a bad thing and basically went away before it could expose too much.
So yeah great, a small fraction of water was removed from the ship at a rate much smaller than that which is coming in.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:37 pm to Riverside
Saudi Arabia got into his wallet these last couple years
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:39 pm to REB BEER
They’re made in India too
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:51 pm to 3down10
quote:
You aren't owed anyone's vote. If you want someone's vote, do things that they support.
Agree 100 percent.
quote:
That's why I'd like to have a constitutional republic removing 95% of the federal government starting with installing an honest monetary system as outlined in the constitution and closing the general welfare clause loophole that allows people to do anything they can spend as "for the good" and so on.
Me too. What are the odds of this happening on your opinion? And what is your backup plan if the odds aren’t good?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:53 pm to 3down10
quote:
I liked that it found corruption and did what it did, but it's like trying to empty a sinking boat with a tea cup instead of plugging the holes first. It was also telling that it didn't take long before suddenly it was a bad thing and basically went away before it could expose too much.
Agreed 100 percent. Do you maybe think you’re the same on the opposite side?
And I’m REALLY interested in what “too much” was going to be exposed and who made it go away. This could be a fun discussion.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:57 pm to 3down10
quote:
You mean people paid you to use the loopholes. Again, that's not fighting the IRS. As you say, you work within the system because you are part of the system.
This is such a beautiful post. You claim to want to abolish the IRS. You cannot describe a single thing you have done to further that goal. But it’s your goal. Yet when I help citizens give less to the IRS…the same organization you want abolished…it is me exploiting “loopholes!”
So you want those “loopholes” closed so more can go to the IRS?
Help me make sense of this. It seems to me you hate the rich and the irs. Have I summed it up appropriately?
Oh and if you would indulge me. Define “loophole.”
quote:
you work within the system because you are part of the system.
As for this part…I’d probably make more as a personal injury guy. I didn’t go that direction. I like fighting the IRS. You like bitching on the Internet.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 4:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Me too. What are the odds of this happening on your opinion? And what is your backup plan if the odds aren’t good?
I can tell you the odds are 0% if people keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils.
My backup plan is the same no matter who wins, because there isn't much difference. I live in a state and community that doesn't put up with bullshite.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:01 pm to 3down10
quote:
I can tell you the odds are 0% if people keep voting for the lesser of 2 evils.
Non-responsive. What you’re advocating for has a zero percent chance as well. But keep fighting that good fight and getting Dems elected.
quote:
My backup plan is the same no matter who wins, because there isn't much difference. I live in a state and community that doesn't put up with bullshite.
Tell me more about this “community!” Preppers? Please say yes…
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:10 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
This is such a beautiful post. You claim to want to abolish the IRS. You cannot describe a single thing you have done to further that goal. But it’s your goal. Yet when I help citizens give less to the IRS…the same organization you want abolished…it is me exploiting “loopholes!”
So you want those “loopholes” closed so more can go to the IRS?
Help me make sense of this. It seems to me you hate the rich and the irs. Have I summed it up appropriately?
I can't help you make sense of the fantasies you create to cope.
Nobody should have to pay income taxes, rich or poor. And somehow from that you can only understand "This guy hates the rich".
It's weird how much you want to make this about rich and poor.
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:11 pm to 3down10
quote:
Nobody should have to pay income taxes, rich or poor. And somehow from that you can only understand "This guy hates the rich".
Agreed. Hasn’t been the case since 1913. What’s your realistic plan to change it?
Who is the last President to say they wanted to eliminate the income tax?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:13 pm to 3down10
quote:
It's weird how much you want to make this about rich and poor.
What is the point in calling the wealthy paying less “loopholes?” If it is any about the wealthy. I’m all years. Define “loopholes” and who gets to utilize these “loopholes.”
I’m using your words. Your inability to defend them isn’t a me problem.
You have brought no facts or proposals to this thread. Just prepper nonsense. You don’t want a solution. You want to feel important. It’s why you think a mission hit the pentagon. It’s why you are a prepper. You need to feel important. You already are important. Don’t be dumb.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Non-responsive. What you’re advocating for has a zero percent chance as well. But keep fighting that good fight and getting Dems elected.
Well see, the difference is what you advocate for is in no way even remotely attempting it. Thus it has a 0% chance.
What I am advocating for is the politicians actually do the shite they say to get elected and actually doing things that would lead to that. Which has a greater than 0% chance.
Which btw, has happened before in history, it created a country based on limited government and freedom. You may have heard of it, it's called the United States of America
quote:
Tell me more about this “community!” Preppers? Please say yes…
It's amazing how many fantasies you are willing to create as a means of cope. Are you a narcissist?
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:17 pm to 3down10
quote:
Well see, the difference is what you advocate for is in no way even remotely attempting it. Thus is has a 0% chance.
Tell us about your attempts to affect change. Staying at home on voting day? You got anything else?
quote:
What I am advocating for is the politicians actually do the shite they say to get elected and actually doing things that would lead to that. Which has a greater than 0% chance.
Love this. You staying home will definitely fix this.
quote:
It's amazing how many fantasies you are willing to create as a means of cope. Are you a narcissist?
Did I fantasize you proclaiming to the board you are part of a community that doesn’t put up with this shite? Want me to link it?
Tell us all about this community. Sounds fascinating.
And I’m likely a narcissist.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:17 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Agreed 100 percent. Do you maybe think you’re the same on the opposite side?
And I’m REALLY interested in what “too much” was going to be exposed and who made it go away. This could be a fun discussion.
I'm supposed to have knowledge of what doge would have exposed if they had been allowed to keep going?
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:18 pm to 3down10
I want to know what you meant by your statement “too much was going to be exposed”. It’s your statement. What did you mean?
Why can’t you EVER provide specifics. All you do is bitch. Never any substance. Are you that TXtiger conspiracy nut? God I hope so. Next thing we will see is you saying “I’m just asking questions”.
Why can’t you EVER provide specifics. All you do is bitch. Never any substance. Are you that TXtiger conspiracy nut? God I hope so. Next thing we will see is you saying “I’m just asking questions”.
This post was edited on 9/13/26 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 9/13/26 at 5:30 pm to Riverside
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News