- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker Carlson says no one's been killed (in the U.S.) by radical islam in 24 years ....
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:18 pm to scrooster
Posted on 12/28/25 at 12:18 pm to scrooster
When Tucker was obviously being paid by Russia to repeat their propaganda, he was defended by a lot of people. This is Tucker’s business model. Has been for years. He is a paid propagandist, loyal to whoever writes the check. Sometimes it is Qatar. Sometimes Trump. Sometimes Russia. It has always been obvious to me and many others. Welcome to the ones who are just figuring this out.
2
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:21 pm to TBoy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Tucker's newfound buddies, their scam religious political ideology .... literally sliced off the head of one of his own employees.
And now he works for them.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:27 pm to TBoy
quote:
When Tucker was obviously being paid by Russia
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:30 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Somehow, some way miserable Jooish supremacists Levin and Shapiro are actually worshiped by goofballs who use language like, "groypers" and "TuckerQatarlson".
Here’s the woke shite.
No one in this thread is simping for Levin or Shapiro. Grow up.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:33 pm to Errerrerrwere
I know the point of pasting those texts all the time is to "prove" that Muh Joos killed Charlie Kirk (which is silly), but it keeps driving home a different point for me.
If Charlie Kirk only put forth a pro Israel narrative in the first place because he got large donations from individual Jews and he sought to punish those individuals for withholding their donations by changing that narrative—which is what that text narrative seems to be saying—he probably wasn't worth listening to in the first place. Seems like he was just broadcasting what he got paid to broadcast if those texts are legitimate.
If Charlie Kirk only put forth a pro Israel narrative in the first place because he got large donations from individual Jews and he sought to punish those individuals for withholding their donations by changing that narrative—which is what that text narrative seems to be saying—he probably wasn't worth listening to in the first place. Seems like he was just broadcasting what he got paid to broadcast if those texts are legitimate.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:34 pm to the808bass
quote:
Wow. So, even by the shitty, pedantic interpretations of the Israel-hating figs in this thread, Tucker lied.
Speaking of falsehoods, this thread appears it will soon pass 20 pages. And still the false subject heading hasn’t been edited.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:36 pm to EphesianArmor
All three, or four, or five .... Tucker Qaterlson, Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens, Ben Shapiro, AND ESPECIALLY Mark Levin are scumbag pieces of shite. Wastes of human skin.
All of them are grifters.
But that also applies to 99% of Hollywood, 80% of Federal level politicians, 75% of news sources, etc.
Honestly, I'd like to see the above mentioned five put in a room, give each of them a knife, and only one comes out .... but hey, that's just me dreaming of how it should be.
Let them talk it out and settle their differences.
All of them are grifters.
But that also applies to 99% of Hollywood, 80% of Federal level politicians, 75% of news sources, etc.
Honestly, I'd like to see the above mentioned five put in a room, give each of them a knife, and only one comes out .... but hey, that's just me dreaming of how it should be.
Let them talk it out and settle their differences.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:39 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Speaking of lies, this thread appears it will soon pass 20 pages. And still the false subject heading hasn’t been edited.
Well .... that's because it's not false.
See how that works?
He actually uttered those words.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:41 pm to scrooster
He actually didn’t utter the words in your thread title.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 1:52 pm to roadGator
quote:
He actually didn’t utter the words in your thread title.
His fricking words, word for word, are literally....
"I don't know of anyone, in the United States in the last 24 years, who's been killed by radical islam."
Word for fricking word, direct quote.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:02 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
I know the point of pasting those texts all the time is to "prove" that Muh Joos killed Charlie Kirk (which is silly), but it keeps driving home a different point for me.
Look kids! Another retard! This thread is about Tucker Carlson isn't it? It's also in response to another post about Charlie Kirk isn't it? Wow! This is really the hill you fricking idiots are going to die on isn't it?
quote:
If Charlie Kirk only put forth a pro Israel narrative in the first place because he got large donations from individual Jews and he sought to punish those individuals for withholding their donations by changing that narrative—which is what that text narrative seems to be saying—he probably wasn't worth listening to in the first place. Seems like he was just broadcasting what he got paid to broadcast if those texts are legitimate.
Again. This thread AND that post was in regards to Tucker Carlson. No wonder you are so easily deceived. You have the IQ of a desk chair.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:03 pm to scrooster
quote:
He actually uttered those words.
Well, I have come to the conclusion that you certainly believe that.
So as a goodwill gesture, I’ll edit my post above accordingly.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:06 pm to the808bass
quote:
No one in this thread is simping for Levin or Shapiro. Grow up.
You're just simping the ones that are doing the political hit jobs on Tucker.
You see the difference don't you boy?
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:07 pm to scrooster
That is not what the thread title says.
You are smart enough to see that.
You just quoted him.
You want your title to be true. I get it. It’s just not.
You are smart enough to see that.
You just quoted him.
You want your title to be true. I get it. It’s just not.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:12 pm to roadGator
quote:
You are smart enough to see that.
He's really not. He has no idea he's in a matrix his X algorithm is setting him up like a dining room fricking table.
He's a clueless moron. A follower. An easily influenced sheep for an establishment that appreciates his ignorance.
And by the nature of this thread; there is plenty to appreciate
He is "woke right" contrast their behavior from what you heard 12 years ago with NAZI propaganda.
Islamic Terror = Qatar = NAZI
It's the same tactic. 808 is a woke little bitch of a man.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:17 pm to scrooster
quote:
His fricking words, word for word, are literally....
"I don't know of anyone, in the United States in the last 24 years, who's been killed by radical islam."
So he is ignoring the dead people as if they werent killed or he just doesnt know the dead people who were killed?
He needs to clarify his point if he doesnt want to seem like a pro-Muslim retard.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:20 pm to djsdawg
quote:
or he just doesnt know the dead people who were killed?
Wow. 20 pages later and we finally arrived at crossing this bridge
And the clarification was already in the context of the discussion.
I know. Another huge leap for the Neanderthal.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:45 pm to scrooster
quote:
His fricking words, word for word, are literally....
"I don't know of anyone, in the United States in the last 24 years, who's been killed by radical islam."
Word for fricking word, direct quote.
The crucial point here is that your post heading and Tucker’s direct quote imply two wholly different things. Carlson’s direct quote reflects his personal experience and does not imply a blanket statement that no one has died from radical Islam in the United States in the past 24 years.
It is simply disingenuous to claim these are equivalent statements. This distinction is vital for any good-faith discussion about Carlson’s argument.
Posted on 12/28/25 at 2:51 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
It is simply disingenuous to claim these are equivalent statements. This distinction is vital for any good-faith discussion about Carlson’s argument.
Is the point of both statements not that radical Islam is not a significant source of homicidal motive in the last 24 years? That Huckster's audience need not worry about it?
Isn't that—in context and to the audience it was uttered—the point?
If not, what is the main idea of those sentences? What are they attempting to convey?
Posted on 12/28/25 at 3:37 pm to djsdawg
quote:
He needs to clarify his point if he doesnt want to seem like a pro-Muslim retard.
Carlson did qualify his remarks in his subsequent comments when he referenced the societal ills and lack of opportunities facing young Americans — specifically young white males. So while Carlson does indeed say, “I don’t know anyone in the United States in the last 24 years who’s been killed by radical Islam,” he follows that comment with observations about how young Americans are beset by multiple calamities such as suicide, unemployment, drug addiction, etc…
By mentioning these other societal ills, Carlson thus qualifies his earlier statement on radical Islam, indicating that he’s highlighting a broad range of social issues rather than offering a blanket dismissal of radical Islam. Within that context, Carlson’s focus wasn’t solely on the threat of radical Islam but rather part of a broader discussion about the most pressing issues plaguing many young Americans today.
Ignoring the full context of Tucker’s statement is exactly what the MSM repeatedly does to Trump. The phony “TRUMP PRAISED WHITE SUPREMACISTS!” narrative is a perfect example of the disingenuousness of this tactic.
This is why it’s important to consider the full context of Carlson’s comments rather than focusing on a single soundbite. Understanding this crucial point is essential to any meaningful critique of Carlson’s argument.
Page 17 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News