Started By
Message

re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"

Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:01 pm to
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11826 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

When Q was brought into the discussion, it became about SRA.



Didn't you bring Q into the discussion? Therefore SRA too?

NVM this thread is so off the rails I forgot about the OP
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:02 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

They stand very nicely by themselves.


Not with your dishonesty but you have not been an honest participant in this thread since your first post in it.

None of the things you just argued are true and I did not say the things you claimed I said. Your entire "argument" involves literally lying. Think about what that says about you that you can't be even a small bit honest.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Didn't you bring Q into the discussion

It's literally in the title of the thread so no because I didn't make the thread

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293903 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

your dishonesty


Aint this rich
Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
19626 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:04 pm to
Since this film was actually filmed before Qanon was even a thing; explain again to us dummies how Qanon has it’s tentacles in this film.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Since this film was actually filmed before Qanon was even a thing;

The mythology Q subscribers promoted has been around a while. 30-40 years at least
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124829 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

I already brought up some of those as examples of actual trafficking.


That’s the point, dumdum. If all movies with trafficking as the subject are Q-anon adjacent, then your appellation (and the media’s) is meaningless.

And it is.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124829 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

The mythology Q subscribers promoted has been around a while. 30-40 years at least


Here’s the shell game.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293903 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:08 pm to
quote:


The mythology Q subscribers promoted has been around a while.


The film has shite to do with your fixation with satanic ritual abuse.

A fixation easily ramped up by third rate movie critics

Posted by mjthe
Virginia
Member since Oct 2020
6870 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:09 pm to
I've debated going down this rabbithole with SFP but I'm pretty sure he's a big contrarian. I'll start with the following: What is SRA and how is it a major part of Q?
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:11 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293903 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:10 pm to
It appears he believes that any discussion of trafficking is Q adjacent

Posted by captdalton
Member since Feb 2021
19626 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

None of the things you just argued are true and I did not say the things you claimed I said. Your entire "argument" involves literally lying. Think about what that says about you that you can't be even a small bit honest.


Those quotes I posted are literally your words.

If anyone here needs to be worried about themselves, it is you. I feel just fine with my position on this.

Besides Hank; I doubt that anyone has read your disjointed ramblings here and thought “yeah, he seems like a well adjusted guy who is right about this whole thing.”

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135307 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

That's why the only way we make a dent in this situation is by fixing that paradigm and severely decreasing psychological abuse, sexual abuse, and rejection of LGBTQ children.
Is that a long winded way to reference drug abuse/addiction?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

That’s the point, dumdum. If all movies with trafficking as the subject are Q-anon adjacent,

They're not, though.

I don't think Leo has ever gone on camera discussing adrenochrome and Blood Diamond wasn't marketed towards a particular demo.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Here’s the shell game.

It's not a shell game. I have never shied away from referencing SRA. I used euphemisms to not offend people likely to melt, but it's been the same argument.

Trafficking exists, but not all (SRA/Illuminati) trafficking exists.

Literally my point this entire thread.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:15 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124829 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:15 pm to
SRA is something that you define so narrowly that it will not exist.

If a multigenerational, highly organized cabal sexually abuses, tortures and murders non-familial children explicitly in the name of Satan in the course of rituals in Satan’s honor on an international scope over many decades with thousands of victims - presto - Satanic ritual abuse.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293903 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:16 pm to


Its amazing how far a drama queen can take a lost argument
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124829 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

SRA/Illuminati


Good. I appreciate the addition of another iteration of conspiracy theory while simultaneously conflating them. Very nicely done. You want to add any more types of the trafficking scares? I would suggest some sort of incorporation of the adrenachrome or stem cell therapy.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

What is SRA a

Satanic Ritualistic Abuse. It's a belief in organized, mass abuse and sacrifice of children as part of Satanic/occult rituals. Best seen in the Satanic Panic. It was a combination of the worst form of televangelism and junk science (like hypnotherapy) and can be expanded from local-micro examples (see: McMartin Preschool Trial) into your typical Illuminati CT (see: Q).

quote:

and how is it a major part of Q?

Q-culture (or "critical thinkers" as to no offend some snowflakes) promoted SRA as part of their mythology.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464952 posts
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Those quotes I posted are literally your words.

Out of context with your own dishonest editorializing.

quote:

If anyone here needs to be worried about themselves, it is you. I feel just fine with my position on this.

Liars often do.
Jump to page
Page First 32 33 34 35 36 ... 49
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 34 of 49Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram