- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/8/23 at 9:58 pm to captdalton
Posted on 7/8/23 at 9:58 pm to captdalton
quote:He is ignoring your demand because doing so is driving your blood pressure into the stratosphere.
Why can’t you just state that child trafficking is wrong? Why is that so hard?
It is kind of funny to watch.
1
Posted on 7/8/23 at 9:58 pm to Motownsix
quote:
Which pizza place does he shoot up?
Doesn't matter, he always orders Cheese Pizza
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:00 pm to captdalton
quote:It is almost as if you cannot read and understand Standard American English, because SFP writes damned-well, and he has not written anything of the kind.
(SFP) has defended child trafficking here
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:09 pm to G The Tiger Fan
quote:
I wonder how many of these people who are so concerned about child safety complain about Ukraine defending itself against Dagestani and Chechan rape squads sent into Ukraine by Putin.
Ukraine Concern Troll Is Concerned. Did you utter a peep about the untold children slaughtered in U.S. Wars of Imperialism over the past 3 decades or so?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:11 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
He is ignoring your demand because doing so is driving your blood pressure into the stratosphere. It is kind of funny to watch.
Or it could be that we have finally come to the real line of delineation between right and left.
The left is currently pushing child sexualization and mutilation. You support this.
The other side says that isn’t right. And you attack them. Here you are.
You are fighting for a 7 year old to be able to tell a doctor to cut his dick off because he is a girl.
That is just where we are. Own it.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:14 pm to captdalton
quote:With every post, you reinforce the assessment that you are EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread.
You are fighting for a 7 year old to be able to tell a doctor to cut his dick off because he is a girl.
I have posted hundreds of times that I do not support transition surgery for minor children.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
With every post, you reinforce the assessment that you are EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread. I have posted hundreds of times that I do not support transition surgery for minor children.
I expect you to adamantly oppose it in your next post.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is almost as if you cannot read and understand Standard American English, because SFP writes damned-well, and he has not written anything of the kind.
Two lawyers, and 16 pages, and they have not actually answered one question. Just crazy. But lots of accusations.
Maybe Shakespeare was correct.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:25 pm to tzimme4
In the movie, He looks like the first pedo arrested
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
With every post, you reinforce the assessment that you are EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread. I have posted hundreds of times that I do not support transition surgery for minor children.
And yet you vote for the party that is legislating this exact thing. And then you have the nerve to tell us you don’t support it. You DID support it. You DO support it.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:30 pm to bamadontcare
quote:"I do not support transition surgery for minor children."quote:I expect you to adamantly oppose it in your next post.
With every post, you reinforce the assessment that you are EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread. I have posted hundreds of times that I do not support transition surgery for minor children.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:37 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread
And yes, on child trafficking and molestation; I am as binary as they come. There are only two options, thus binary. It is either wrong to traffic or molest children. Or it isn’t. I think it is. You don’t. And if you molest or traffic children you will end up in hell. Again, that is binary.
But I am not as progressive or enlightened as you.
How did SlowFlowPro use to host the TD radio show? Did they know he was down with diddling kids? I can’t think they would have been cool with that.
Is this really where you want to end up? On the side of child trafficking and abuse? It seems the answer is yes.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:37 pm to captdalton
quote:You are an idiot.
With every post, you reinforce the assessment that you are EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread. I have posted hundreds of times that I do not support transition surgery for minor children.quote:
And yet you vote for the party that is legislating this exact thing.
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush-41
1992 Bush-41
1996 Dole
2000 Bush-43
2004 Bush-43
2008 McCain
2012 Romney
2016 LPA
2020 LPA
My very first vote was for Phil Gramm in the special election after he resigned as a Dem and ran for the same seat as a Republican.
My only votes for Dems above the level of local/county government have been for the Court of Criminal Appeals when no LPA candidate was in the race. Texas GOP appellate judges tend to ignore the Bill of Rights, so I refuse to give them my vote.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:41 pm to AggieHank86
Sadly, pedophiles don’t have a single political party.
But there is only political party promoting it. And here you are.
But there is only political party promoting it. And here you are.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:45 pm to captdalton
quote:No, Dalton, you are wrong.quote:And yes, on child trafficking and molestation; I am as binary as they come. There are only two options, thus binary.
EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread
As to THIS THREAD, one can oppose child sex trafficking AND STILL think that the Jimmy Caviezel film is full of Q-esque nonsense.
quote:Yes, it is. No, I don't. You are an idiot.
It is either wrong to traffic or molest children. Or it isn’t. I think it is. You don’t.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
With every post, you reinforce the assessment that you are EXACTLY the binary thinker described earlier in this thread.
I want to remind everyone that you really got me by calling me a binary thinker about child trafficking and molestation.
Thank you for the compliment. On this issue there is no middle ground or grey area. There is no third position.
It is completely binary. Either child trafficking is ok. Or it isn’t. That is what binary means; one of two choices. I would hope that everyone is binary about child molestation. And that all of them would be against it. But that isn’t the case.
It isn’t ok. Child trafficking, molestation, and sexual abuse are wrong. That is my binary position. There is no middle ground. There is no third side. There are two binary sides. You may take the other side. But there is no middle ground.
The fact you think it ISN’T binary is horrifying.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:00 pm to AggieHank86
Where did SlowFlowPro go? Why did AggieHank show up to fight his battle?
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
the Jimmy Caviezel film is full of Q-esque nonsense
I really don’t think this is the case
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:05 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
as I said 10 pages ago, I don’t know whether it is true or not. I am simply stating that the two positions are not inconsistent
Page 16 of 49
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News