- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump's response to Rep. John Lewis' comments
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:57 am to Keltic Tiger
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:57 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
Illinois to have all those dead citizens vote?
Link?
0
Posted on 1/14/17 at 11:59 am to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
True which is why Hillary win the popular vote.
What is up with you libs and poor grammar?
quote:
The racist, xenophobic, cowardly minority votes in Trump.
Ah, there we go with the racist, xenophobic, lost the popular vote shtick! If you think 60 million people are racist and xenophobic, then you probably need to have a psychological analysis done.
Have fun being in the MINORITY for the next four years while the rational, reasonable adults make the decisions.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:01 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Or you think Breitbart isn't a racist website.
I don't read Breitbart regularly, because I hate the layout and the popups, but I occasionally read it and I've never seen anything even marginally racist.
Now, I use the real definition of racism, not the new one where every minority shits rainbows and burps sparkly stars and is infallible.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:01 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I've never seen anything even marginally racist.
You're illiterate? How are you even on this board?! That's amazing!
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:02 pm to BamaAtl
Show me one example?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:06 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:07 pm to Wally Sparks
The best part of this? Lewis's district has a lower crime rate than downtown Indianapolis (majority white).
Why doesn't Trump get his own VP to shape up his own capital city before going on rants against civil rights icons?
Why doesn't Trump get his own VP to shape up his own capital city before going on rants against civil rights icons?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:12 pm to BamaAtl
I asked for an example and you linked an editorial from another publication.
Most of that article was controversial stuff that Steven Bannon and Milo have said, outside of Breitbart, but still not racist. Leslie Jones? LOL, she's said enough racist stuff on Twitter to get banned 10 times.
I'll wait for you to link a racist article from Breitbart, but I won't hold my breath.
Most of that article was controversial stuff that Steven Bannon and Milo have said, outside of Breitbart, but still not racist. Leslie Jones? LOL, she's said enough racist stuff on Twitter to get banned 10 times.
I'll wait for you to link a racist article from Breitbart, but I won't hold my breath.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:20 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I asked for an example and you linked an editorial from another publication.
Which included links from Breitbart.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:26 pm to Wally Sparks
Can we please make the President of theUnited States stop engaging in tweet wars like a fricking teenager?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:43 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:Do you?
I believe this is bullshite at worst, and a gray area up for debate at best.
The law was/is crystal clear.
quote:Stanley Ann Dunham would have had to be 19yrs old to convey citizenship in the case of an overseas birth.
On December 24, 1952, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the "1952 Statute") became effective. As under the previous statute, where both parents were U.S. citizens, one parent would have to have resided in the United States prior to the child's birth in order to transmit U.S. citizenship. The meaning of residence previously applied under the 1940 Statute was essentially the same as under the 1952 Statute.
In the case of a child born to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent, the U.S. citizen parent now had only to be physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions prior to the child's birth for 10 years, at least 5 of which were after the age of 14. "Physical presence" was different from the concept of "residence" which had applied under the previous statute. The physical presence requirement could be satisfied by mere presence in the United States even if the person had not established a legal residence there.
The 1952 Statute imposed a revised requirement on any such children to be continuously physically present in the United States for at least 5 years between the ages of 14 and 28 in order to retain citizenship. The retention requirement was retroactively applied to any person born on or after May 24, 1934.
LINK
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:48 pm to EastNastySwag
quote:
Spoken like a dumb black on the govt plantation
The frick?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 12:56 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
speak his mind to racists.
You mean be racist because he once denounced racism. That's a load of horse manure.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 1:05 pm to ljhog
Late to this thread, but I just gotta post The Root's headline for all of this . . .
these people . . .
quote:
Did Donald Trump Just Come for John Lewis During MLK Weekend?
these people . . .
Posted on 1/14/17 at 1:05 pm to NC_Tigah
That is far from crystal clear definitely open to interpretation.
The children of our citizens should always be citizens, regardless of the details of their birth.
And it is indefensible for that to be the law for our citizens, while we simultaneously allow anchor babies to gain citizenship.
The children of our citizens should always be citizens, regardless of the details of their birth.
And it is indefensible for that to be the law for our citizens, while we simultaneously allow anchor babies to gain citizenship.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 1:07 pm to BamaAtl
Which ones do you consider racist? I asked for a single example.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 1:26 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
In the case of a child born to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent, the U.S. citizen parent now had only to be physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions prior to the child's birth for 10 years, at least 5 of which were after the age of 14.
Stanley Ann Dunham would have had to be 19yrs old to convey citizenship in the case of an overseas birth.
quote:
That is far from crystal clear definitely open to interpretation.
Which part do you see as "open to interpretation"?
quote:Listen, I agree 100%. But when it comes to existing law, it is of course not so much what should be, as what is. The law is clear.
And it is indefensible for that to be the law for our citizens, while we simultaneously allow anchor babies to gain citizenship.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 1:37 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Which part do you see as "open to interpretation"?
The fact that you quoted an analysis of the law and the author's interpretation, not the actual law.
The law was changed and updated many times and many sections referenced old laws and carried over or didn't carry over certain sections. Certain sections that weren't referenced were assumed to be in force. It's quite a hodge podge.
Just the fact that it made a distinction between legitimate and illegitimate tells me it wouldn't withstand a real challenge.
It's all a moot point now, thankfully.
Posted on 1/14/17 at 1:52 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The best part of this? Lewis's district has a lower crime rate than downtown Indianapolis (majority white).
When you district includes Buckhead and Druid Hills, no shite.
How about a direct comparison between downtowns?
Posted on 1/14/17 at 2:06 pm to BamaAtl
Joke...right?? That was the NYT. Not BB.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News