- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump tweets a message to the Mullahs
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:03 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
you mental midget.
Just don’t whine when some uses an ad hom ever again. He didn’t call you anything.
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:03 pm to Wtxtiger
I sure as shite ain’t taking up for Iran or playing the role of concern troll ex- military and in reality you’re a fricking never trump democrat, probably a Bernie Bro, that would call Trump out for doing nothing and call him out for killing terrorist enemies.
It would not matter what he did, you would attack him for it. I hope our military isn’t infected with more of you. God damn democrat.
It would not matter what he did, you would attack him for it. I hope our military isn’t infected with more of you. God damn democrat.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:04 pm to bamarep
quote:
Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have targeted 52 Iranian sites...
Glad Trump did this. Earlier reports of “waiting for response from Iran” seemed weak and defeated the purpose of deterrence.
Double down and let them know we have 10-fold where that came from if you frick around.
Wouldn’t hurt to lob a few more missiles over there just to remind them who controls this situation.
This is how you conduct foreign policy against rogue and shadow regimes. Call their bluff and dare them to push all in with a losing hand.
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:05 pm to Wtxtiger
quote:Why are you ranting and raving at yourself? Off the meds again?
I sure as shite ain’t taking up for Iran or playing the role of concern troll ex- military and in reality you’re a fricking never trump democrat, probably a Bernie Bro, that would call Trump out for doing nothing and call him out for killing terrorist enemies.
It would not matter what he did, you would attack him for it. I hope our military isn’t infected with more of you. God damn democrat.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:07 pm to TigerCoon
I believe any part of their nuclear program would become very deep holes. Government buildings and control and command. Any thing that could be used to stop tankers would be handy.
The real point is to help the protesters overthrow their government. Why piss off and unite people by hitting a mosque or cultural site. There are more than 520 strategic sites much less 52.
The real point is to help the protesters overthrow their government. Why piss off and unite people by hitting a mosque or cultural site. There are more than 520 strategic sites much less 52.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Why are you ranting and raving at yourself? Off the meds again?
Were you off your meds when you accused me saying you were all in for muh russians earlier?
Slow your roll. You are being a hypocrite.
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:08 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The guys who died on every island from Guadalcanal to Iwo Jima would be surprised to learn that we won the Pacific War without putting boots n the ground.
Thank you Little Boy and Fat Man!
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:09 pm to OleWar
quote:
I bet you ate a shite lot of food and are a fat stupid frick, are you mad at the 92G because one wouldn't give you seconds. Only an a-hole would denigrate anyone who served based on MOS.
I fricking nailed it.
BTW, how long did it take you to google all this?
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:09 pm to roadGator
quote:And I promptly and publicly apologized for the error. Let’s see how HE reacts.
Were you off your meds when you accused me saying you were all in for muh russians earlier?
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:09 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, they would. But WE (I hope) are not the Taliban.
This is emotional nonsense.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:09 pm to AggieHank86
I've seldom seen such insanity over what I see as a simple "you went to far Iran" response by the US.
We've got WWIII is coming, the draft is coming, we are invading Iran and death threats seemingly on the POTUS.
Insanity.
We've got WWIII is coming, the draft is coming, we are invading Iran and death threats seemingly on the POTUS.
Insanity.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:11 pm to AggieHank86
Why would he apologize for accidentally replying to himself?
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:13 pm to AggieHank86
I hit the wrong button. But yea, ranting again. Dude gave me the red arse. That’s why I have stayed on the football board. Too many god damn Democrats on the political board. It was making me pissed off all the time. Watching Joe destroy teams, especially the Aggies, have made my life much happier. Maybe I need to hit the SEC rant for a while to get in a better mood, lol. fricking concern troll had me pissed off. But really, you’re no better but you’re an Aggie so it’s expected.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:15 pm to goatmilker
quote:I agree. There is essentially zero doubt that Iran was the force behind the nonsense at the Embassy. Killing Suleimani was an entirely appropriate response, and I praised Trump for it .
I've seldom seen such insanity over what I see as a simple "you went to far Iran" response by the US.
We've got WWIII is coming, the draft is coming, we are invading Iran and death threats seemingly on the POTUS.
Insanity.
Advance warning of our planned response to future aggression was also entirely appropriate, and I said in this very thread that I approve of Trump’s communication ... though I would not have done it by Twitter.
None of that changes my willingness to examine the potential consequences and to do so as objectively as possible.
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:17 pm to roadGator
I was discussing Munch (who posted the inane “you got him now” nonsense), not WTX.
Yes, I teased WTX for replying to himself. That was all in good fun, which he obviously recognized ... judging from his reply.
Yes, I teased WTX for replying to himself. That was all in good fun, which he obviously recognized ... judging from his reply.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:18 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
None of that changes my willingness to examine the potential consequences and to do so as objectively as possible.
Then you must also weigh the consequences of inaction.
How many dead American military is this guy responsible for? And if reports are true then inaction potentially leads to more dead Americans. His life or ours? That is POTUS decision.
This post was edited on 1/4/20 at 7:21 pm
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:19 pm to AggieHank86
It's a hot LZ and in days past we would all let the dust settle a bit and then analyze our sitrep.
Those days are long gone lol.
Those days are long gone lol.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:19 pm to Wtxtiger
quote:Dude, if you get that excited about having 5-10% disagree with you, you need to look into some treatment for stress management.
Too many god damn Democrats on the political board. It was making me pissed off all the time
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:20 pm to BobBoucher
Minimum 600 he is credited with.
Posted on 1/4/20 at 7:21 pm to BobBoucher
quote:Did you miss the part about praising the decision to turn him into ground meat?
Then you must also weigh the consequences of inaction.
How many dead American military is this guy responsible for? And if reports are true then inaction potentially leads to more dead Americans. His life or ours?
Back to top


0




