- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:We simply must be all on the lock step agreement!
There is nothing "weak" about the malleable target of plainly stating the goal of the policy
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:30 am to Jbird
quote:
We simply must be all on the lock step agreement!
No. That's not what I said
I said the plainly stated goal of the policy. Not your potential echo chamber interpretation of that goal.
Is this trade war to:
1. Bring jobs back
2. Create "fair trade" by having other countries lower tariffs
3. Generate revenue to replace the income tax
Those are the 3 most common goals. They cannot all co-exist, in fact, they may not all be able to even overlap, really. There has to be one goal, so which is it?
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:31 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
Sell!!! Sell!!! Sell!!
No one is telling folks to sell low.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Your high jack of the thread is nearly complete. 
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:21 am to Jbird
quote:
South Africa, already in diplomatic conflict with Trump over its affirmative action laws
"Affirmative action" is a weird way to say genocide and theft.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:lulz
If those countries want to engage in suboptimal economic decision-making, that's their choice
quote:please always reference globalist loyalty when devising such a word collection
suboptimal economic decision-making
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:25 am to SDVTiger
quote:Every accusation by those clowns is acutally a confession.
But Rogerthecucker, SFP abd the rest of the clowns said Orange and his team are dummies
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:28 am to KingOrange
quote:
This is what it was all about.
Why would a country offer concessions when Trump could change his mind at any moment.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
No, it is #4 which is to lower the manufacturing output of China spread to other nations and away from our economic and potential military adversary.
quote:
o. That's not what I said
I said the plainly stated goal of the policy. Not your potential echo chamber interpretation of that goal.
Is this trade war to:
1. Bring jobs back
2. Create "fair trade" by having other countries lower tariffs
3. Generate revenue to replace the income tax
Those are the 3 most common goals. They cannot all co-exist, in fact, they may not all be able to even overlap, really. There has to be one goal, so which is it?
Popular
Back to top


1






