- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump to discuss NATO withdrawal
Posted on 4/8/26 at 8:51 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/8/26 at 8:51 pm to Indefatigable
What about Kosovo?
This post was edited on 4/8/26 at 8:52 pm
2
Posted on 4/8/26 at 8:52 pm to kilo
quote:
What about Kosovo?
The airstrikes we led, or the permanent mission we installed?
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:09 pm to jammajin
You're a pussy
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:12 pm to jammajin
IDGAF if Nato gets involved in this conflict or not. However, air space should not be closed in NATO countries to the USA no matter what
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:40 pm to Indefatigable
To counter the Eastern block countries / Soviet Union, which effectively collapsed in the early 90’s.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:42 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
To counter the Eastern block countries / Soviet Union
Yes, and thereby prevent war in Europe.
Yes, the USSR collapsed.
What are the negatives to remaining in NATO? In what way is it a detriment?
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:46 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:Commander in Chief can pull troops and direct drawn downs. The bases can stay. We can still be in NATO but POTUS can neuter the whole damn thing.
Only Congress can withdraw us.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:49 pm to Indefatigable
The Soviet Eastern Block collapsed and yet NATO kept on expanding Eastward . If you’re standing in Moscow, there’s only one way you can see this. And it’s overtly hostile.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:11 pm to phaz
We are NATO.
Europe is a dying old man.
Europe is a dying old man.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:17 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
What are the negatives to remaining in NATO? In what way is it a detriment?
quote:
Total Defense Spending (2025 Estimate): The US is the largest contributor to the alliance's overall strength, with an estimated $980 billion in total defense spending for 2025, which accounts for roughly 60% to 62% of the total combined defense spending of all NATO allies.
Bc it’s not a free membership. At least not for us. And our western “allies” are so afraid of the third world mason they’ve imported that they won’t even assist in an operation that benefits all.
This post was edited on 4/8/26 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:17 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
The Soviet Eastern Block collapsed and yet NATO kept on expanding Eastward . If you’re standing in Moscow, there’s only one way you can see this. And it’s overtly hostile.
Moscow isn’t threatened by NATO, at all. I’m sorry that you are dumb enough to believe that.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:18 pm to biglego
quote:
Total Defense Spending (2025 Estimate): The US is the largest contributor to the alliance's overall strength, with an estimated $980 billion in total defense spending for 2025, which accounts for roughly 60% to 62% of the total combined defense spending of all NATO allies.
How are so many of you so unbelievably ignorant?
That number is OUR OWN DOMESTIC DEFENSE SPENDING. We spend that money whether we’re in NATO or not.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:20 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Moscow isn’t threatened by NATO
have they ever attacked a NATO country?
have they ever attacked a non-NATO country?
your answers will compromise your assertion.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:22 pm to Rebel
quote:
your answers will compromise your assertion.
No, correlation does not equal causation.
Moscow’s abject fear is the EU and economic factors. They aren’t scared of NATO invading from Estonia.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:23 pm to phaz
Even if he does, the next non-MAGA POTUS will get back in NATO.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:26 pm to Indefatigable
NATO was not formed to invade the USSR.
It was formed to keep USSR from invading.
Has Russia fricked with the Baltics since they joined NATO?
It was formed to keep USSR from invading.
Has Russia fricked with the Baltics since they joined NATO?
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:27 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Indefatigable
Thinks being in NATO is free. We’ve all been educated today.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:28 pm to Rebel
quote:
NATO was not formed to invade the USSR. It was formed to keep USSR from invading. Has Russia fricked with the Baltics since they joined NATO?
No.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:28 pm to biglego
quote:
biglego
Thinks defense spending is “NATO funding”.
That makes you a very dumb person FWIW.
Posted on 4/8/26 at 10:32 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
That makes you a very dumb person FWIW.
Well, I was taught by you after all. You’ve taught us that NATO costs us nothing. That’s news to everyone on earth, but it’s good news.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News